Jump to content

Why do I lose money even when my CFDs trading is Profitable

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey everyone,

I've just started a Demo account exploring how to trade CFDs however, what I've noticed is that despite I made a small profit there through a few trades I kept losing my funds value. The way I understood CFDs simply that it magnifies your returns whether it was profits or losses. But the confusing for me is that in my case should profits trades overcome the losing ones. Any explanation for that?

For the below tradings, my funds went from 10,000 to 9,812.93! A 187 short?

Capture.JPG

Capture.JPG

Edited by JSmoney

Share this post


Link to post

Hi 

I think you forgot to add commission for ech trade that where missing money are i think :)

Check trade history and you should see how much ech trade cost you on fees 

Hope this help

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Hi,

That's true what was the reason of loss, but why there is double commission worth of 12.12 for each trade?

Is the CFD trade commission cost 24.24?

111.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, JSmoney said:

Hi,

That's true what was the reason of loss, but why there is double commission worth of 12.12 for each trade?

Is the CFD trade commission cost 24.24?

111.JPG

Hi, is it not the commission fee? (note min is £10 each way).

https://www.ig.com/uk/help-and-support/spread-betting-and-cfds/fees-and-charges/what-are-igs-shares-cfd-product-details

image.png.32fed8417a164577db219660a997e774.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Yes your cost of trading is not being covered by the small profits you are making.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Thanks for your answers guys, appreciate it

I guess this trade below covers or in other words the commission is calculated within the trade profit result! Right?

Capture.JPG

Share this post


Link to post

It is worth looking at the spread betting account option as if you are taking small size positions for shorter time periods, you need a big move to make enough cover the quite high fees and still make a profit. Forex does not have commission on CFD's but stocks and I think Indexes do. Spread betting has a larger spread to overcome but can work out a cheaper way to enter and exit trades if they are small and not held for larger moves.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Above American Airline is share of a company and you pay a additional set fee for buying and selling it which is  £12.12 in this case.

Wall Street Cash index is spread betting  and difference between buying ans selling is the spread added or included within the trade. So  you don't see it separately.   

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

So you are down at least £20 to start with every time you decide to open a position? That seems like a pretty bad deal. 
Wasn't there a smaller commission/trade cost if more than a certain amount of trades are placed in a month? 
It just seems strange. If you're averaging say 4-5 trades a day you get a £100 dent into your profits (supposing you are profitable on all the trades). Seems unreasonable.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
20 hours ago, Msim224 said:

So you are down at least £20 to start with every time you decide to open a position? That seems like a pretty bad deal. 
Wasn't there a smaller commission/trade cost if more than a certain amount of trades are placed in a month? 
It just seems strange. If you're averaging say 4-5 trades a day you get a £100 dent into your profits (supposing you are profitable on all the trades). Seems unreasonable.

If you're from the UK you can trade stocks on a spread betting account. The fee would be the spread x your bet size. 

You may find this more cost effective for your trading strategy. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
4 hours ago, CharlotteIG said:

If you're from the UK you can trade stocks on a spread betting account. The fee would be the spread x your bet size. 

You may find this more cost effective for your trading strategy. 

It is definitely the only reasonable option for a frequent or intraday trader. 
Another thing that seems to go against the concept of profitability (in both spreadbets and cfd accounts) is the minimum stop loss distance: in most of the assets it's 2% which is a HUGE gap, and makes it impossible to place a reasonable position. I've seen it explained as a way to avoid slippage risks on volatile markets, but it is literally on basically on 90% of the shares listed, and some that don't have the 2% seem to be some of the most volatile assets. 
It is incredibly limiting and puts the investment at unnecessary risk.
Something should definitely be done about this. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
On 10/06/2020 at 13:09, Msim224 said:

It is definitely the only reasonable option for a frequent or intraday trader. 
Another thing that seems to go against the concept of profitability (in both spreadbets and cfd accounts) is the minimum stop loss distance: in most of the assets it's 2% which is a HUGE gap, and makes it impossible to place a reasonable position. I've seen it explained as a way to avoid slippage risks on volatile markets, but it is literally on basically on 90% of the shares listed, and some that don't have the 2% seem to be some of the most volatile assets. 
It is incredibly limiting and puts the investment at unnecessary risk.
Something should definitely be done about this. 

 

Other members have mentioned the large minimum stop distance. I have relayed the message to our exposure/ risk teams to see if they can be tightened. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 15/06/2020 at 15:31, CharlotteIG said:

 

Other members have mentioned the large minimum stop distance. I have relayed the message to our exposure/ risk teams to see if they can be tightened. 

Did they come back to you on this, Charlotte?

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,422
    • Total Posts
      63,139
    • Total Members
      83,821
    Newest Member
    huangzx
    Joined 19/09/20 11:09
  • Posts

    • I want to believe that, even if we had viruses for many years and we lived with them like nothing happened, this one is killing more people than it should. At least is what reports are saying. That is why countries are forcing lock-downs. Think about that a lock-down is going to extend the furlough policies all over the world again. I don't think a government want to pay that money out to citizens if they don't have to, and companies are going to have to close business for good if we have a second lock-down everywhere. I agree with the statement that we had many corona-viruses before i.e. common flu, but why now governments are taking these draconian measures to force people into a quarantine? If we had the same dangerous viruses always around why are they now locking people at their homes. Did they not care about people before? I think the virus is way more deadly than they tell us and that is why people are not really that scared of it. If we had all the information that is available to professionals we would be really scared and people would lock themselves without waiting any government to tell them. My wife is Chinese and I get their news first hand. They are not reporting what is really happening since the very beginning and it is really hard to trust the Chinese government  on anything related to this virus. They still have the problem there, they keep locking entire cities down for short periods the minute they see anything. It is not reported here in the news but every week they lock people down at their homes.  This virus is really nasty and if locking people down is going to stop it, let's do it. 
    • I agree with 99% of this - the current strain is virtually exact to a strain found in 2012 by a group of Chinese scientists, then when 6 of them died from exposure the virus was sealed and sent to Wuhan I challenged David Icke  to prove the excess deaths were'nt excess deaths, from the info I looked into I'm satisfied the virus is genuine and I'm probably one of the worlds biggest sceptics  From a lock down point of view I'd of thought the perfect place to test out compliance of mass herds would be the USA - hasn't happened strongly enough for me to be concerned but it shown those that could create such circumstances how compliment most people are.  
    • Corona virus has been with us since forever we just never mass tested before. There are no extra deaths this year than any other and it's the same unfortunate types who die of corona virus every year (over 80's with pre-existing conditions 90% of cases). Corona virus is always circulating in the population most people being completely unaware and asymptomatic, herd immunity is built and the virus mutates or dies out. Tests just show you have been exposed to the virus at some stage which could have been months ago and you were most likely asymptomatic. Vaccines don't work for corona virus because they mutate very quickly which is why there is no vaccine for the common cold (a corona virus). And why flu shots don't work very often because they are based on the previous years dominant strain not the current year's (the mass manufacturing would be too late). Covid 19 has already been mutating and the last studies I saw several weeks ago confirmed that as usual a particularly nasty strain becomes less deadly with each new mutation. Another 30,000 people will die next year from respiratory infections as it's the 5 year rolling average (covid 19 or not), weather it'll be covid 19 next year or another strain no one knows but they will keep the covid ball rolling anyway. So all in all it looks like lockdown til the end of time.      
×
×