Jump to content

MA on Volume


Recommended Posts

The web platform desperately needs some love, but IG's usual response is to just go and use PRT.  Which would be fine if it was complimentary and not dependent on a certain number of trades a month.

  • Like 1
Link to post
21 hours ago, dmedin said:

The web platform desperately needs some love, but IG's usual response is to just go and use PRT.  Which would be fine if it was complimentary and not dependent on a certain number of trades a month.

I would love to be able to use PRT but I trade part time (sneak a few looks during work) and that platform is not very flexable in regards to mobility.  If on the other hand IG would do a broker deal with Tradingview than that would change the game for me as that is my go to charting platform.

 

20 hours ago, TrendFollower said:

@Quacker,

I appreciate you are asking specifically about a MA selection for the volume indicator that is not available at present on IG's platform.

However, there is the 'Volume Weighted Moving Average'.

Apologies if you were already aware of it or it is not something that is of interest or relevant to you. 

Thank you, I was aware of this but was adding to the suggested features list.

Link to post
36 minutes ago, Quacker said:

I would love to be able to use PRT but I trade part time (sneak a few looks during work) and that platform is not very flexable in regards to mobility.  If on the other hand IG would do a broker deal with Tradingview than that would change the game for me as that is my go to charting platform.

Totally agree with you and was just thinking the same thing.

@CharlotteIG Would be great if IG could partner with Tradingview, ditch your home brew web platform because let's be honest it just isn't very good :( 

Edited by dmedin
  • Like 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,746
    • Total Posts
      68,527
    • Total Members
      57,389
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    Amiiiro
    Joined 23/01/21 20:28
  • Posts

    • yes the twitter poster did mention the 1 month lag but what is the point of you posting a link to an article on the total deaths for 2020 dated in October hahaha.   as you can see the 2020 data is in line with previous years and that's the point. A pandemic should be causing far in excess of normal deaths and in Spain, as in more and more countries as the data comes in, it definitely has not. Not sure why you keep embarrassing yourself maintaining the farce when long since the data has proved  your beloved lockdowns to be not only useless but actually damaging. If only everyone had had their pay stopped for every lockdown then there would have been none at all (just like Sweden).   .
    • Article from EFE agency proving this report wrong.  https://www.efe.com/efe/espana/efeverifica/el-numero-de-muertos-en-espana-2020-no-es-menor-al-anos-anteriores/50001435-4381326
    • As homework try to translate the first sentence right below the table. This is a picture that has been moving around since the beginning of this month. It is fish bait for the right-wing fellows in Spain, they love this kind of fake reports.  It is interesting that you are now posting it as well, very interesting.
×
×
  • Create New...