Jump to content

Do stops lead to fewer profitable trades?

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I realise stops are there to allow you to set a risk/reward ratio but my question is whether your trade is much more likely to succeed if you don't have a stop or you use stops like an emergency stop i.e. the risk to reward is massive for any particular trade.  I've had many trades where i've set a stop and its been closed out because the market has turned but only just enough to hit my stop.  If i'd set the stop lower, with more time it would have been successful.  Perhaps its more about knowing where to set the stop based on the chart rather than being so concerned about the ratio itself?  So i'm not anti-stops by any means i realise they're essential especially if you can't monitor your positions constantly but having a higher risk-bigger stop or better positioning of it could increase chance of success?  Any opinions anyone on this? 

Also is there such a thing as having a probability of success on a trade?  I.e. if you have a low limit is the probability of success higher than a high limit e.g. 0.5 vs 20, time is also a factor on all of this.  Or do people just see the market as black and white up or down i.e. if its going up half a point its going to go up 10 points so whats the point of very low limits. Of course market conditions may also influence the probability, so i assume successful traders although they can't put a % probability on success they can read the market well enough that they can roughly say that there is likely a greater than 50% chance that any trade may be successful?  Sorry just rambling really.  I haven't invested hours and hours of reading so presumably there are answers to all of this and I need to read more.

Thanks for any comments in advance

 

Share this post


Link to post

You could lower your stake and allow for a bigger SL .But always risk no more than what you are comfortable % wise

 

Share this post


Link to post

Larry Connors did a study on this in the 90's (using stops or not)

I use stops - I just add a point or 2 to cover spreads etc

The markets are mathematical points of force, the laws of probability and probabilistic returns apply to trading - most people never get in sync with that hence the high failure rate

Dr. Van Tharps book "Trade your way to financial freedom" details probability, statistical returns, win distribution and risk brilliantly.

Hope it helps and good luck on your trading journey

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
13 minutes ago, THT said:

Larry Connors did a study on this in the 90's (using stops or not)

I use stops - I just add a point or 2 to cover spreads etc

The markets are mathematical points of force, the laws of probability and probabilistic returns apply to trading - most people never get in sync with that hence the high failure rate

Dr. Van Tharps book "Trade your way to financial freedom" details probability, statistical returns, win distribution and risk brilliantly.

Hope it helps and good luck on your trading journey

 

SSH!  Don't tell him, else he might STEAL it 🤣

Share this post


Link to post

Backtest 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

The main job of a stop loss is to ensure you don't experience a monumental loss and wipe out your entire account. 

  • Like 1
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Acidtrip said:

The main job of a stop loss is to ensure you don't experience a monumental loss and wipe out your entire account. 

Yeah this is the conclusion I have come to, it doesn't mean there aren't big risks.

Share this post


Link to post
15 hours ago, dmedin said:

SSH!  Don't tell him, else he might STEAL it 🤣

Thanks for the info i'll look into that

Share this post


Link to post
28 minutes ago, u0362565 said:

Thanks for the info i'll look into that

No?

Share this post


Link to post
19 minutes ago, dmedin said:

No?

Sorry it was because you quoted THT and i posted on your quote not his!

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, u0362565 said:

I realise stops are there to allow you to set a risk/reward ratio but my question is whether your trade is much more likely to succeed if you don't have a stop

most people can get direction right but mess up the execution and so stops end many trades that would have come right but without stops and even with very large stops your whole account is at risk.

Many algos take a different path, they see direction and a likely entry point but instead of a stop put in a hedge if price turns against them and just wait, so the equal trade in the opposite direction keeps the PnL static until price turns in their favour once again or just abandon the trade.

However you choose to do it you must do something to cover bad execution.

20 hours ago, u0362565 said:

Also is there such a thing as having a probability of success on a trade? 

no, all trades have a probability of 50/50 which is why you need a repeatable process,  a strategy which you can test and prove positive expectancy over a number of trades (see thread 'Trade Planning and Testing').

 

Edited by Caseynotes
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

a strategy which you can test and prove positive expectancy over a number of trades (see thread 'Trade Planning and Testing').

Especially the TradingRush Youtube videos! 😻🤓🐮

Share this post


Link to post
5 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

most people can get direction right but mess up the execution and so stops end many trades that would have come right but without stops and even with very large stops your whole account is at risk.

Many algos take a different path, they see direction and a likely entry point but instead of a stop put in a hedge if price turns against them and just wait, so the equal trade in the opposite direction keeps the PnL static until price turns in their favour once again or just abandon the trade.

However you choose to do it you must do something to cover bad execution.

no, all trades have a probability of 50/50 which is why you need a repeatable process,  a strategy which you can test and prove positive expectancy over a number of trades (see thread 'Trade Planning and Testing').

 

I'm sure you're right on the 50/50 but to someone not in the know if the conditions look favourable i.e. there is a trend in one direction and you go in that direction how does it not swing to be greater than 50/50.  Anyway sorry i will go read some more.  Also getting annoyed by not being able to close because of price movements in the market it says that can be the difference between profit and loss i have found out.  Whats the probability of success if the **** platform worked seamlessly i wonder.. 

  • Thought provoking 1

Share this post


Link to post
5 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

no, all trades have a probability of 50/50

Are you sure about that?🧐

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Are you sure about that?🧐

of course, but perhaps you know different, you only trade with the trend so presumably your win rate is a lot higher than 50%? 🧐

Edited by Caseynotes
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
43 minutes ago, u0362565 said:

I'm sure you're right on the 50/50 but to someone not in the know if the conditions look favourable i.e. there is a trend in one direction and you go in that direction how does it not swing to be greater than 50/50.  Anyway sorry i will go read some more.  Also getting annoyed by not being able to close because of price movements in the market it says that can be the difference between profit and loss i have found out.  Whats the probability of success if the **** platform worked seamlessly i wonder.. 

The problem is that people think they are trading with IG but they're not, they're trading in a market via IG. This is not a computer game where if you push the A button there is an automatic result, when you shout out a bid at an auction you might get a fill or you might just get a round of laughter instead. So the platform is not always the problem. It's not up to IG to fill your orders, it's up to IG to try to get your orders filled by other market participants, if the market has stopped then the market has stopped and everyone has to wait for it to start up again.

There is also the problem of getting run over by the big boys who are able to step in and take out multiple levels with just a nod and suddenly the next best price is a very long way from your order.

Some might remember I wrote this awhile ago in response when someone asked 'is spread betting for fools?'

'I didn't realise I was competing in a two way auction, I thought I was just gambling like I do in Vegas where if the action is really hot and the big guys are throwing lots of money around and the spread is getting bigger and bigger then that is exactly the right time to jump in, boy was I suckered.'

Share this post


Link to post
54 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

of course, but perhaps you know different, you only trade with the trend so presumably your win rate is a lot higher than 50%? 🧐

Yes, the odds of being right are significantly less than 50% :D 

Share this post


Link to post
45 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

The problem is that people think they are trading with IG but they're not, they're trading in a market via IG. This is not a computer game where if you push the A button there is an automatic result, when you shout out a bid at an auction you might get a fill or you might just get a round of laughter instead. So the platform is not always the problem. It's not up to IG to fill your orders, it's up to IG to try to get your orders filled by other market participants, if the market has stopped then the market has stopped and everyone has to wait for it to start up again.

There is also the problem of getting run over by the big boys who are able to step in and take out multiple levels with just a nod and suddenly the next best price is a very long way from your order.

Some might remember I wrote this awhile ago in response when someone asked 'is spread betting for fools?'

'I didn't realise I was competing in a two way auction, I thought I was just gambling like I do in Vegas where if the action is really hot and the big guys are throwing lots of money around and the spread is getting bigger and bigger then that is exactly the right time to jump in, boy was I suckered.'

Yeah I'd completely disconnected from what's really happening. You're right its not a computer game!

Share this post


Link to post

'is spread betting for fools?'

Karl Marx was right, the stock market is for swindlers and anyone who goes near it is a fool. :)

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      11,906
    • Total Posts
      60,285
    • Total Members
      80,172
    Newest Member
    KernowTrader
    Joined 08/08/20 10:55
  • Posts

    • This is my 2% swing file on the FTSE100 Index: Thought I'd show this as its messy! As you can SEE - there are multiple 2 higher lows that just did NOT work for one reason or another - this is why money management is crucial However, when it did work - the results were (profit target of 240pts, stop of 25 pts = 9.6R) If 1R = 2% of account then you're up 19% in 4 trading days Now the smart ones of you, will be asking yourself "How often does this happen in a YEAR on a DAILY chart?"  The answer is go and look - This is the water, I've led you to it, it's now up to those that want to win at this game to investigate Oh and YES, there are many more ultra simple trading methods in a year on a daily chart with these sorts of R profit value returns - the SP500, Nasdaq100, FTSE250, FTSE100, EURUSD etc etc etc all produce OPPORTUNITIES per year that return you 100%+ and nearer 300% PER market - Nothing more than a swing file on your charts! NO Indicators, No Moving Averages, just RAW price action I think for this thread I'll leave it there - If you can't prosper with these ultra simple methods then you're doing something massively wrong and if you go back and check the rules to success that i started this thread with, you'll be messing up on 1 or more of them - REVISIT them and learn them The one thing i will say is "To win big in the markets, you have to do what most others aren't doing - WD Gann showed me in his works the 2 Higher Lows / Lower Highs trade set-up, he wrote about it 100+ years ago! Along with many others that produce mega returns from the markets - I'm willing to bet very little is published out there on this subject" If you go down the Gann route - contact me - it is fraught with bad information and works, this is because people devote a lot of years to researching Gann and when they get to the end and realise they can't work it out they still publish the sub-standard work they have been researching, which then clogs up the trading literature world and after reading 10 so called Gann books and getting nowhere people then form the opinion that Gann is a load of tosh - I was one of those people back in early 2010's, then I did something most others wouldn't bother doing, I decided to research and discount it all myself I can tell you for a FACT: That Gann angles WORK  Time Cycles WORK Price Retracement and Expansion ratios WORK But only if you use them correctly, in the right context and conditions Why did the SP500 Index stop dead in March 2009 @ 666pts?  Back in the 1900's WD Gann wrote of the "Gravity Centre" or the 50% level - there lies the answer Good luck on your trading journey, most f you are going to fail because you're not applying the keys/rules to success - this is another fact. Here's a little bonus material Gann Angles chart for you If you KNOW the Time Cycle date and a simple Gann 1x1 angle falls onto THAT date (to the day) then you can be quietly confident that price is going to reach said 1x1 Gann angle within a few days of the date! The KEY is knowing Time Cycle dates - the ones above AREN'T the Time Cycles Gann mentions in his works THT
    • Here's another 2 LOWER highs
    • Simply basic price patterns can make you an absolute fortune in this game - look at the one above on GOLD! This is 100% why I advocate using swing files - you get to see the market in a different perspective  The chart is UK: WWH - the spread is way to wide to trade this  The 2 high Lows trade to the left of the chart, worked, but you'd of broken even on the trade at worst - This is WHY money management is crucial in this game! There's nothing special to this trading method - It's also an Elliott Wave (EW) method too, but often if you employ strict EW rules you wouldn't take the trade. TIP: If you have software that can search for Elliott Waves, then set it to look for Wave 4's  the blue W4 box on my software tells me that price is in the perfect price AND time zone for a EW 4 If price CLOSES below the #3 low then it would CONFIRM a bearish swing low  For simplicity all we want is for price to validate the trade by trading LOWER than #3 and we'd be in the trade Again simple money management rules - Stop = 25% of the 50 period ATR (20pts) / once up 2 x risk (40pts) stop goes to break-even +0.1 to ensure some sort of profit and then protect 40% of any open profit  Opportunity, excellent R profit potential, excellent risk management = As good as it gets, doesn't guarantee a wining trade though  
×
×