Jump to content

Best Research for Crude Oil

Recommended Posts

Morning,

Fairly new to day trading but doing pretty well so far but can someone please suggest the best source for "up to the minute" news on Crude Oil.

For example, I knew there was a meeting yesterday lunchtime re: OPEC+ Tech, but nothing came up with the results of the meeting until about 21:00 and I feel I missed out on yesterdays up lift due to this.

 

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, gball1975 said:

Morning,

Fairly new to day trading but doing pretty well so far but can someone please suggest the best source for "up to the minute" news on Crude Oil.

For example, I knew there was a meeting yesterday lunchtime re: OPEC+ Tech, but nothing came up with the results of the meeting until about 21:00 and I feel I missed out on yesterdays up lift due to this.

 

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

yes, pay for it, a monthly subscription to a squawk box service will deliver news quicker than any free web page, most have a free 1 month trial.

one of the best web sites for oil is this one  https://oilprice.com/Metals/Commodities

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Dunno pal, Goldman Sachs 'experts' said crude at $35 soon and it's now getting closer to $45.  You don't need to pay anything to look at the charts and see what price is doing.

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Dunno pal, Goldman Sachs 'experts' said crude at $35 soon and it's now getting closer to $45.  You don't need to pay anything to look at the charts and see what price is doing.

a squawk box is a news service, you are paying to receive market moving news before the general riff raff using Reuters free version. News providers such as Reuters have a number of options that vary in price, IG pay for a better than free service for their clients. If you happen to have a  spare 100k you could subscribe to Bloomberg's digital language service that delivers direct to your trading algo 🧐 

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Caseynotes said:

yes, pay for it, a monthly subscription to a squawk box service will deliver news quicker than any free web page, most have a free 1 month trial.

one of the best web sites for oil is this one  https://oilprice.com/Metals/Commodities

Thanks.  From the link you provided do I just go on "get exclusive intel" pr click "my account" and create an account?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
3 minutes ago, gball1975 said:

Thanks.  From the link you provided do I just go on "get exclusive intel" pr click "my account" and create an account?

 

 

no, these types of sites do analysis, for news there is not one solely for oil but for markets in general, for a free trial you need something like  https://www.livesquawk.com/

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

a squawk box is a news service, you are paying to receive market moving news before the general riff raff using Reuters free version. News providers such as Reuters have a number of options that vary in price, IG pay for a better than free service for their clients. If you happen to have a  spare 100k you could subscribe to Bloomberg's digital language service that delivers direct to your trading algo 🧐 

Speaking of which, I was looking for any particular reason why oil and stocks started plunging right now (17:25 ish) and so I loaded the Twitter feed on IG and Tyler Durden tells us it is because Apple is closing some stores because of zombie apocalypse.  So there you go, it is useful!

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,422
    • Total Posts
      63,139
    • Total Members
      83,817
    Newest Member
    Bdabas89
    Joined 18/09/20 23:08
  • Posts

    • I want to believe that, even if we had viruses for many years and we lived with them like nothing happened, this one is killing more people than it should. At least is what reports are saying. That is why countries are forcing lock-downs. Think about that a lock-down is going to extend the furlough policies all over the world again. I don't think a government want to pay that money out to citizens if they don't have to, and companies are going to have to close business for good if we have a second lock-down everywhere. I agree with the statement that we had many corona-viruses before i.e. common flu, but why now governments are taking these draconian measures to force people into a quarantine? If we had the same dangerous viruses always around why are they now locking people at their homes. Did they not care about people before? I think the virus is way more deadly than they tell us and that is why people are not really that scared of it. If we had all the information that is available to professionals we would be really scared and people would lock themselves without waiting any government to tell them. My wife is Chinese and I get their news first hand. They are not reporting what is really happening since the very beginning and it is really hard to trust the Chinese government  on anything related to this virus. They still have the problem there, they keep locking entire cities down for short periods the minute they see anything. It is not reported here in the news but every week they lock people down at their homes.  This virus is really nasty and if locking people down is going to stop it, let's do it. 
    • I agree with 99% of this - the current strain is virtually exact to a strain found in 2012 by a group of Chinese scientists, then when 6 of them died from exposure the virus was sealed and sent to Wuhan I challenged David Icke  to prove the excess deaths were'nt excess deaths, from the info I looked into I'm satisfied the virus is genuine and I'm probably one of the worlds biggest sceptics  From a lock down point of view I'd of thought the perfect place to test out compliance of mass herds would be the USA - hasn't happened strongly enough for me to be concerned but it shown those that could create such circumstances how compliment most people are.  
    • Corona virus has been with us since forever we just never mass tested before. There are no extra deaths this year than any other and it's the same unfortunate types who die of corona virus every year (over 80's with pre-existing conditions 90% of cases). Corona virus is always circulating in the population most people being completely unaware and asymptomatic, herd immunity is built and the virus mutates or dies out. Tests just show you have been exposed to the virus at some stage which could have been months ago and you were most likely asymptomatic. Vaccines don't work for corona virus because they mutate very quickly which is why there is no vaccine for the common cold (a corona virus). And why flu shots don't work very often because they are based on the previous years dominant strain not the current year's (the mass manufacturing would be too late). Covid 19 has already been mutating and the last studies I saw several weeks ago confirmed that as usual a particularly nasty strain becomes less deadly with each new mutation. Another 30,000 people will die next year from respiratory infections as it's the 5 year rolling average (covid 19 or not), weather it'll be covid 19 next year or another strain no one knows but they will keep the covid ball rolling anyway. So all in all it looks like lockdown til the end of time.      
×
×