Jump to content

Why is there an $8 charge for non auto FX conversion?


Recommended Posts

Just did a quick scalp trade on Kodak, testing out if its possible using share dealing . <2mins 

as you can see IG always has some way of sneaking in a charge .

I gained $7590 + $7615  - $15118 = +$87 yet when I see the GBP proceeds its $5,749 + $5,766.82 - $11,568.5  = -£52

If I elect to to have the USD to USD automatically not converted they have a $8 charge, In this case it would still be a profit of $71

Under spread bet its a 9 point spread so would also have been a loss also.

My question is why is there an $8 charge, anytime  I phone and ask IG, I just get , "that's just the way the rules are" 

 

 

 

 

FX.jpg

Edited by DavyJones
Link to post

Shhhh, I was under the impression that the minimum charge for not using their automatic currency conversion was $15 - at least that's what it says on their charges and commissions page:

'*Note for multi-currency accounts: These figures apply to clients who opt for the default setting of 'instant currency conversion'. Clients who choose to convert currencies manually will pay commission of 2 cents per share with a minimum charge of $15 on US stocks.'

Link to post
1 hour ago, Fletch said:

Shhhh, I was under the impression that the minimum charge for not using their automatic currency conversion was $15 - at least that's what it says on their charges and commissions page:

'*Note for multi-currency accounts: These figures apply to clients who opt for the default setting of 'instant currency conversion'. Clients who choose to convert currencies manually will pay commission of 2 cents per share with a minimum charge of $15 on US stocks.'

oh so it is damm!

time to find another broker, Not paying  $30 round trip given I trade 4 or 5 times a day!

IG just not suited for this 

  • Sad 1
Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      14,244
    • Total Posts
      70,595
    • Total Members
      59,176
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    Viswa
    Joined 24/02/21 23:26
  • Posts

    • I'm trying to work out the Return on Assets on some banks which is Income/Assets but I don't know which figure on the accounts to use.  I'm using Stockopedia. Do I use the Net Income listed part way down the Income statement or the one right up top of the Cash Flow Statement? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    • It's not being terrified of losing. I get that you need to lose sometimes to win but in the end of the day your account/expectancy needs to be positive, so I guess it's the fear of repeated losses or the one big loss that you then need to recover from, 2 steps forward 3 steps back. That's of course if you're willing to put yourself in a big loss situation i.e. too big a position size.
    • Sorry captainsamurai, are you actually saying that you won't go bankrupt? In my case no I'd stop trading before that happened but I could sure make a nice dent in my savings first.
×
×
  • Create New...