Jump to content

Why is there an $8 charge for non auto FX conversion?


Recommended Posts

Just did a quick scalp trade on Kodak, testing out if its possible using share dealing . <2mins 

as you can see IG always has some way of sneaking in a charge .

I gained $7590 + $7615  - $15118 = +$87 yet when I see the GBP proceeds its $5,749 + $5,766.82 - $11,568.5  = -£52

If I elect to to have the USD to USD automatically not converted they have a $8 charge, In this case it would still be a profit of $71

Under spread bet its a 9 point spread so would also have been a loss also.

My question is why is there an $8 charge, anytime  I phone and ask IG, I just get , "that's just the way the rules are" 

 

 

 

 

FX.jpg

Edited by DavyJones
Link to post

Shhhh, I was under the impression that the minimum charge for not using their automatic currency conversion was $15 - at least that's what it says on their charges and commissions page:

'*Note for multi-currency accounts: These figures apply to clients who opt for the default setting of 'instant currency conversion'. Clients who choose to convert currencies manually will pay commission of 2 cents per share with a minimum charge of $15 on US stocks.'

Link to post
1 hour ago, Fletch said:

Shhhh, I was under the impression that the minimum charge for not using their automatic currency conversion was $15 - at least that's what it says on their charges and commissions page:

'*Note for multi-currency accounts: These figures apply to clients who opt for the default setting of 'instant currency conversion'. Clients who choose to convert currencies manually will pay commission of 2 cents per share with a minimum charge of $15 on US stocks.'

oh so it is damm!

time to find another broker, Not paying  $30 round trip given I trade 4 or 5 times a day!

IG just not suited for this 

  • Sad 1
Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      14,279
    • Total Posts
      70,689
    • Total Members
      59,250
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    Shahuk
    Joined 26/02/21 18:00
  • Posts

    • @CharlotteIG This is not frustration Charlotte, this is absolute anger, rage and fury; I have affected positions that are currently trading at a loss which could easily be in profit in a timescale acceptable to me - in the meantime I pay the associated costs, Saga being a prime example, yet IG are forcing me to take £000's of cash loss through no fault; IG have accepted a commercial contract on which they are now reneging at my significant cost
    • Maybe IG have decided that with such exceptional demand, they don't need to worry about long term clients.  The exceptional mob will not be around for the long haul.  As a result of what IG have done, long term clients may not be around for the long haul either.
    • Charlotte, we keep seeing the message that's it's small caps that have been withdrawn. It isn't.  For example, Hikma has a market cap of £5.2bn and is in the FTSE100. How do we know which other companies IG might decide to do the same to? We are also told that it's due to exceptional client demand. In that case, limit new opening positions (buy and sell). Why should we long-term clients suffer due to this?
×
×
  • Create New...