Jump to content

** Urgent: Dubious Tesla pricing **


MarcBergh

Recommended Posts

Dear community members,

I thought it only prudent to make other members aware of a few rather questionable & significant price drops that occurred on IG’s Tesla stock back on 17 & 19 August (pre-split).  

There may have been other examples of this occurrence on Tesla, or indeed other surging technology stocks, although the below examples are the ones I noticed & reported to IG.

The screen grab examples mentioned below are attached fyi.

1.      Monday 17/08- 9AM open. Price range showing a 17,649.50  point (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen in the market. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?   

2.      Wednesday 19/08- As per the above example, another sharp and large movement down in price, again at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 

Both these price drops weren’t evident on my TradingView screen where I get a direct pre-market price feed from NASDAQ. Furthermore, both price drops were then omitted from IG’s screens soon after they occurred. Rather mysterious.

I wrote to IG asking for an explanation on these price drops, and the omission, where staff from Trading Services told me they were due to a “display error”, and that “The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.”

To be frank, I found these answers given by IG to be both inadequate & unacceptable. This is especially so given the fact these massive price drops didn’t actually happen in the market (NASDAQ), and were omitted by IG soon after they took place.   

As I stated in the below mail trail with IG, clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order, potentially causing considerable financial loss.

Given the potential severity of the issue at hand, I would have thought this would be dealt with professionally & expeditiously by IG, which it hasn’t. Clearly this very skewed pricing wouldn’t fill IG customers with confidence going forward.

I still haven’t been given an update on the developer fix for these “display errors”….

Thoughts welcome, mail trail below with attachments.

Kind regards,

Marc.  

 

** Urgent: Tesla pricing **

 
 
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

 <marcbergh@gmail.com>

AttachmentsWed, 19 Aug, 15:30
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi all, 
 
For the past few days, namely on 17 August & today 19 August, there have been two very large downward price movements in Tesla's stock price at the 9am UK pre-market open. Said price movements then disappear when refreshing the IG screen a few minutes later.
 
I captured both via screen grab, with today's also including the above omission example when refreshing the screen. 
 
Please find attached 3 .JPG files:
 
1.   "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down)"- as the file name suggests, the sharp and large movement down in price this morning at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 
2. "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down)"- the above large downward price movement has clearly disappeared from the screen, no trace of a candle wick at all?
3.  "IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down)"- similar example here on Monday 17/08- price range showing a 17,649.50 (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?
 
These questionable price drops look like a possible flash crash of sorts, although I get a direct feed from NASDAQ into my trading screen on TradingView where I manage my risk, and none of the aforementioned price drops are evident. 
 
Perhaps I have missed something here, but please provide an explanation as to how these prices were generated, and why they were later omitted. Clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order. I'm wanting to trade Tesla going forward but this is not filling me with confidence. 
 
In case you need it, my account ID *****
 
I look forward to your reply.
 
Kind regards,
Marc. "
 
The following day, I then received the below reply from Michael Ye in Trading Services... 
 

Re:** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

20 Aug 2020, 04:30 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
"Dear Mark,

Thanks for your detailed email.

Sorry to hear about your issues with our charts. This is a known issue and our developers are currently looking into this at high priority.

Trades are executed based on the market price, chart is indicative only and in this case a display error.

Case reference: INC0465098

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Alternatively, we've recently launched our new Help & Support site which gives you answers from our huge knowledge-base, online community, and education hub.

Regards,"

Michael Ye
Trading Services

IG

 

To which I replied the following.... 

20 Aug 2020, 11:33 (13 days ago)
 
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi Michael,
 
Thanks for your response. 
 
Trades may be executed based on the market price, but as you well know, risk is modelled, including stop losses, based on volatility/price action of the underlying asset. IG prices shown on the chart therefore directly impact this risk modelling, even if they are indicative. 
 
It could therefore be viewed as unacceptable market practice, for an FCA registered company, on more than one occasion, to have such a massive spread/gap between the prevailing market price & what IG screens are showing. It's highly probable that these "display errors" would directly and negatively impact any customers financially who are long a stock, in this case Tesla. 
 
Please provide an ETA for when your developers will have fixed said "display errors", and what controls are being put in place at IG to ensure this doesn't happen again. 
 
Kind regards,
Marc.  "
 
I then received the below reply from Anton Liebenberg in trading services.... 
 

Re: ** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 / OTCPT-5728

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

Thu, 20 Aug, 16:20 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
 
 
"Dear Marc,

Thanks for your email. The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us."

Regards,
Anton Liebenberg
Trading Services

IG
 

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down).JPG

Link to comment

couple of points to note.

IG data is used to process accounts first and is then sent on to a third party and used to construct the charts, occasionally there may be a glitch in the chart building process causing a spike but usually does not affect your account at all and is redrawn fairly quickly or at least on next market open.

Secondly, if there ever is a problem with your actual account IG have a pretty good record of refunding any loses when reported judging by the years I've spent monitoring this forum.

Link to comment

Casey thanks for your reply. 

When you say "IG data is used to process accounts first", what do you mean by that exactly? Would that be the prevailing market price that Michael @ IG refered to? 

If this is indeed a glitch in the chart building process, or a "display error" as IG states, and would in turn not affect your account at all, including in terms of your risk management (aka- stop loss), then IG should have stated that explicitly. They clearly left that crucial part out. As a trader you can only go by what price you see on the charts. 

Bottom line is it shouldn't take this long to sort this issue out & their comms was poor. I've worked for a number of Fintech firms and this is sub par.    

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, MarcBergh said:

Casey thanks for your reply. 

When you say "IG data is used to process accounts first", what do you mean by that exactly? Would that be the prevailing market price that Michael @ IG refered to? 

If this is indeed a glitch in the chart building process, or a "display error" as IG states, and would in turn not affect your account at all, including in terms of your risk management (aka- stop loss), then IG should have stated that explicitly. They clearly left that crucial part out. As a trader you can only go by what price you see on the charts. 

Bottom line is it shouldn't take this long to sort this issue out & their comms was poor. I've worked for a number of Fintech firms and this is sub par.    

 

I have no direct link with IG or knowledge as to exactly how the system works but going by discussions on the forum over the years including input from IG staff IG's price data is directly linked to accounts and is also sent to the company that actually builds the charts which is IT-Finance. This means that any glitches appearing on the charts that are occur during the chart building process will not automatically adversely affect your account.

The 'prevailing market data' can only be IG's current best bid/offer prices at any particular time and is the data used to trigger account orders.

Occasional false spikes seem to occur on every broker's platform as is reported on social media and usually don't affect an account but sometimes the problem originates further up stream and can do, but any financial discrepancies that do occur and are reported to IG and here on the forum seem to get resolved fairly quickly.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

This is dubious and hopefully not a deliberate systematic foul play from IG?
I sometimes see discrepancies between two trading systems side by side. Will be more watchful.. I experienced something during a CFD transaction but did not have a screenshot. Resulted me into closing my position absorbing some loss. These kind of glitches reduce the confidence and transparency.

Link to comment
18 hours ago, MarcBergh said:

Dear community members,

I thought it only prudent to make other members aware of a few rather questionable & significant price drops that occurred on IG’s Tesla stock back on 17 & 19 August (pre-split).  

There may have been other examples of this occurrence on Tesla, or indeed other surging technology stocks, although the below examples are the ones I noticed & reported to IG.

The screen grab examples mentioned below are attached fyi.

1.      Monday 17/08- 9AM open. Price range showing a 17,649.50  point (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen in the market. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?   

2.      Wednesday 19/08- As per the above example, another sharp and large movement down in price, again at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 

Both these price drops weren’t evident on my TradingView screen where I get a direct pre-market price feed from NASDAQ. Furthermore, both price drops were then omitted from IG’s screens soon after they occurred. Rather mysterious.

I wrote to IG asking for an explanation on these price drops, and the omission, where staff from Trading Services told me they were due to a “display error”, and that “The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.”

To be frank, I found these answers given by IG to be both inadequate & unacceptable. This is especially so given the fact these massive price drops didn’t actually happen in the market (NASDAQ), and were omitted by IG soon after they took place.   

As I stated in the below mail trail with IG, clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order, potentially causing considerable financial loss.

Given the potential severity of the issue at hand, I would have thought this would be dealt with professionally & expeditiously by IG, which it hasn’t. Clearly this very skewed pricing wouldn’t fill IG customers with confidence going forward.

I still haven’t been given an update on the developer fix for these “display errors”….

Thoughts welcome, mail trail below with attachments.

Kind regards,

Marc.  

 

** Urgent: Tesla pricing **

 
 
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

 <marcbergh@gmail.com>

AttachmentsWed, 19 Aug, 15:30
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi all, 
 
For the past few days, namely on 17 August & today 19 August, there have been two very large downward price movements in Tesla's stock price at the 9am UK pre-market open. Said price movements then disappear when refreshing the IG screen a few minutes later.
 
I captured both via screen grab, with today's also including the above omission example when refreshing the screen. 
 
Please find attached 3 .JPG files:
 
1.   "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down)"- as the file name suggests, the sharp and large movement down in price this morning at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 
2. "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down)"- the above large downward price movement has clearly disappeared from the screen, no trace of a candle wick at all?
3.  "IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down)"- similar example here on Monday 17/08- price range showing a 17,649.50 (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?
 
These questionable price drops look like a possible flash crash of sorts, although I get a direct feed from NASDAQ into my trading screen on TradingView where I manage my risk, and none of the aforementioned price drops are evident. 
 
Perhaps I have missed something here, but please provide an explanation as to how these prices were generated, and why they were later omitted. Clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order. I'm wanting to trade Tesla going forward but this is not filling me with confidence. 
 
In case you need it, my account ID *****
 
I look forward to your reply.
 
Kind regards,
Marc. "
 
The following day, I then received the below reply from Michael Ye in Trading Services... 
 

Re:** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

20 Aug 2020, 04:30 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
"Dear Mark,

Thanks for your detailed email.

Sorry to hear about your issues with our charts. This is a known issue and our developers are currently looking into this at high priority.

Trades are executed based on the market price, chart is indicative only and in this case a display error.

Case reference: INC0465098

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Alternatively, we've recently launched our new Help & Support site which gives you answers from our huge knowledge-base, online community, and education hub.

Regards,"

Michael Ye
Trading Services

IG

 

To which I replied the following.... 

20 Aug 2020, 11:33 (13 days ago)
 
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi Michael,
 
Thanks for your response. 
 
Trades may be executed based on the market price, but as you well know, risk is modelled, including stop losses, based on volatility/price action of the underlying asset. IG prices shown on the chart therefore directly impact this risk modelling, even if they are indicative. 
 
It could therefore be viewed as unacceptable market practice, for an FCA registered company, on more than one occasion, to have such a massive spread/gap between the prevailing market price & what IG screens are showing. It's highly probable that these "display errors" would directly and negatively impact any customers financially who are long a stock, in this case Tesla. 
 
Please provide an ETA for when your developers will have fixed said "display errors", and what controls are being put in place at IG to ensure this doesn't happen again. 
 
Kind regards,
Marc.  "
 
I then received the below reply from Anton Liebenberg in trading services.... 
 

Re: ** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 / OTCPT-5728

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

Thu, 20 Aug, 16:20 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
 
 
"Dear Marc,

Thanks for your email. The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us."

Regards,
Anton Liebenberg
Trading Services

IG
 

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down).JPG

I have found this a lot with IG charts.

Should they offer Trading View or ProRealTime included in the IG trading platform package?

I'd certainly have much more confidence in trading and investing via IG if it did! Am I alone? I sincerely doubt it, there must be hundreds, thousands similarly affected, like you, and myself.

A simple case in point (there are hundreds and hundreds of these....)

ICDU

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF USD

1932208194_Screenshot2020-09-03at09_07_40.thumb.png.9bcd708d266bbc4544aca9b9d31fcaa6.png

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, rwi said:

I have found this a lot with IG charts.

Should they offer Trading View or ProRealTime included in the IG trading platform package?

I'd certainly have much more confidence in trading and investing via IG if it did! Am I alone? I sincerely doubt it, there must be hundreds, thousands similarly affected, like you, and myself.

yes, false spikes do occur on broker platforms and especially so on the demo but as said only very rarely affect actual live accounts.

PRT is available on IG though they are also associated with the chart build firm IT-Finance (as are many other brokers).

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Caseynotes said:

yes, false spikes do occur on broker platforms and especially so on the demo but as said only very rarely affect actual live accounts.

PRT is available on IG though they are also associated with the chart build firm IT-Finance (as are many other brokers).

Yes I saw your comments previously, which I noted. However, I do not agree that it is acceptable for a company like IG and it's aspirations see https://www.iggroup.com/about-us/who-we-are/our-purpose-and-values

It is also not 'cutiing edge like other competitors.

Sooner or later this late of Leadership in charting will become a 'tipping point'. It is merely a finance issue (i.e. management decision making flaw), which I believe they have got wrong. IG's global marketplace simply won't accept it for much longer, despite benign tolerance in home market. I reply merely to give some more credence to the idea. I have no particular wish to challenge your views, which are fine as they are.

I have paid for several hundred pounds with IG in the past of Prorealtime when I wasn't regualrly in the market or using an IG competitor as my main trading platform, yet had over £100k deposited with IG. Not good custoemr service - disrecpectful I'd call it. IG has to work harder. As a company with almost £3billion Market Cap it is simply 'poor performance' masking as something else. Stuart Wheeler, IG's founder, financier and political benefactor, 1935-2020, who died this year aged 85, was a spread betting pioneer. I just can't believe he'd be happy with the knowledge state of IG's customer services, and charting anomalies (whatever hollow excuses and denials are likely to follow)


https://www.ft.com/content/a54be868-232a-45d9-a545-6b7091e5d0ea
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
16 minutes ago, rwi said:

IG's founder, financier and political benefactor, 1935-2020, who died this year aged 85, was a spread betting pioneer. I just can't believe he'd be happy with the knowledge state of IG's customer services, and charting anomalies (whatever hollow excuses and denials are likely to follow)

yes the customer service has been garbage since the start of this 'everyone stay at home and save the nhs' covid farce but then again so has my bank's.

  • Like 1
  • Thought provoking 1
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, dmedin said:

🤔

yes, the usual MO is to howl blue murder on the forum then note there's a complaints procedure, initiate the complaints procedure, then come back on the forum and say 'actually it's all sorted' or not bother and just quietly carry on trading with IG anyway.

In the last 4 years I've only heard of 2 that ended up taking their complaint to the FCA.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
On 03/09/2020 at 16:25, Guest Bal said:

This happens with Microsoft every day.

The following day, these spikes have disappeared.

 

Thanks for your post. 

Sometimes there are incorrect spikes on the platform. This can be down to quotes in the market that were not traded at. If the price isn't traded at we will not close positions off the price. Our technical team do then go and remove any incorrect pricing. 

All the best. 

  • Great! 1
Link to comment

I seen this also and commented on a YT trading channel.  It also happened on Amazon @ $760.......

Oddly enough my IG isn't loading again!  and if it does the charts aren't loading.

Quick update, my Share Dealing platform has defaulted to the Classic again!

Edited by nit2wynit
  • Like 1
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, nit2wynit said:

I seen this also and commented on a YT trading channel.  It also happened on Amazon @ $760.......

Oddly enough my IG isn't loading again!  and if it does the charts aren't loading.

Quick update, my Share Dealing platform has defaulted to the Classic again!

 

Oh, it isn't just me that took a shafting up the tailpipe :(

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      15,694
    • Total Posts
      75,102
    • Total Members
      63,111
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    GetMad
    Joined 31/07/21 12:27
  • Posts

    • The new CDC Massachusetts study is drawing a lot of attention. The CDC is using it to promote mutant risk but there is a lot more to the story. - 74% of 882 people infected with coronavirus in the US outbreak were fully immunised but only 50% of US are fully vaxed suggests the vaccines are making people more susceptible to infection (which indicates vaccine ADE). - The viral load was found to be the same for the vaccinated and non-vaxed alike which would suggest the vaccine was not offering any protection at all (which indicates vaccine ADE). - Most of the 74% were symptomatic, such a high ratio of symptomatic/unsymptomatic for the delta variant would suggest the vaccine was compromising the immune system making symptoms worse (which indicates vaccine ADE).   Meanwhile, a CDC Internal Document: “Universal masking is essential to reduce transmission of the Delta variant” This is nonsense, masks can only stop droplet borne virus not virus as aerosol. An infected person will breath out 50,000 with each breath and they float on air, travel much more than 2 meters, and around perspex screens, and through the weave of a mask. UK lifts mask mandates at the peak of new cases ... and immediately the curve collapses.   .  
    • Main stream media are waking up to the fact all is not right concerning the vaccines. The fully vaxxed are the majority of new cases. No one is as yet coming out and saying vaccine ADE but all the indications are pointing that way. So far all the blame is being heaped solely on mutants but that can't be the whole story. Vaccine ADE enhances the virus while compromising the immune system. CNN @CNN ''Vaccination alone won't stop the rise of variants and in fact could push the evolution of strains that evade their protection, researchers warned.''  Vaccination is not enough by itself to stop the spread of variants, study finds - CNN    'Study finds 74% of outbreak sufferers were fully vaccinated'. (US is only 50% vaxed) Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021 | MMWR (cdc.gov) ('Breakthrough infections'' is a term meaning infections in vaccinated people)   CNBC @CNBC 'CDC says 74% of people infected in Massachusetts Covid outbreak were fully vaccinated.' JUST IN - 'More than 110,000 breakthrough cases in the US' (Bloomberg)   And from SAGE yesterday evening; ''JUST IN - SAGE, the UK's health "expert panel," warns next Covid "super mutant variant" could kill up to one in three people, and the "vaccine roll-out may even speed up mutant strain's emergence." (Daily Mail) The last half of that headline is a clear indication they at least suspect vaccine ADE. SAGE: Next Covid variant could kill one in three people | Daily Mail Online   Safe vaccines, the ones that completed their long term trials before roll out don't cause 'super mutants'. We are starting to see why Dr Robert Malone was calling for the vax programme to be stopped immediately in the video posted above.   Pfizer now saying vaccines will not be enough so as well as perpetual booster jabs they are developing oral antivirals. (oh - like Ivermectin you mean - can't use that, it only cost a few cents) Pfizer Inc.  @pfizer  Alongside vaccines, success against #COVID19 will likely require #antiviral treatments for those who contract the virus. We’ve started a Phase 2/3 trial to evaluate a potential oral therapy that will enroll over 2,000 participants infected with SARS-CoV-2:   So the vaccines don't actually work then except to incapacitate your immune system and create super mutants.   And in another new twist Social Media are quietly starting to remove the warnings they habitually place on posts that might, even slightly, be construed as anti-vax. 🤔   .edit bad pic crop.  
    • OK - I think I'm going to leave this thread here for the time being - its covered a lot I want to end it on a very very advanced concept - Gann related obviously! Gann was light years ahead of his time, the below is going to prove this fact, his methods were esoteric and he was beaten to these laws of the world by the Egyptians (you'll see the shape in the images below) The markets are not doing what you think they are doing - there's forces you are not aware of at work behind the scenes driving prices on ALL markets This post is to get you thinking - I'm not making any claims, but the other day on a EURUSD thread I did highlight a buying zone of which price has "suddenly" rallied upwards from! In the chart below we'll look at the 4  points shown on the chart 1-4, because these have been recent major swing points - I want to show you what Gann was thinking and talking about over 100 years ago - I will keep it as simple as possible This is Gann's "Square of 9" - look at the shape of it on a top down view - its basically the Pyramids! (TIP: Imagine pulling the centre number shown up towards you to visualise the concept) Basically this is a square root calculator - as you go up or down levels around the sq or 9 you going through increments of square root %'s - there are major intersections of the square and those are shown on the images as the yellow painted sections - north, south, east, west etc - see where price lands on those lines around the major turns I think we can agree totally, from this entire thread and what I'm showing you below that Gann and his methods have massive significance on the markets and as traders that means profiting from.  This is EURUSD Daily Swing High #1: OK we get a major swing high price of 12350, this gets inputted into the Gann sq or 9 as the CENTER/PEAK of the square - the calculator then generates all the levels around that price according to the maths of the sq of 9 - see chart We have NO idea prior which levels "might" cause resistance or support and we don't know when either - what we DO know is that the major intersection in YELLOW "could" do something - the thing is we are aware of these levels well in advance and before price gets near! So from the top at 12350, prices falls to a low of 11952, then rallies to 12243, then falls to 11835, rallies then falls into the swing low #2 of 11704 I've highlighted the relevant prices on the Gann sq of 9 below for you - EACH swing turn point was 2 pips - 2 pips off the yellow highlighted price levels - take a minute to think about that 2 pips from price levels worked out yonks in advance by a method of a trader from over 100 years ago, that he discovered from studying the Egyptians who built temples to the fact thousands of years prior! OK coincidence? Coincidence - I think not, here's the next chart of the swing UP from 2-3 We have a LOW of 11704, rally to 12150, low of 11986 and then the swing high #3 at price level 12266 Again we have price finding support and resistance at price levels within pips of the major intersections on the gann sq of 9 OK last swing 3-4 High of 12266, low 11847, high 11975, low of 11805 I don't think I need to say anymore From 11805 here's the square of nine numbers to which the market might find support/resistance from (Remember the YELLOW lines are the major points to watch) - IF 11805 is the swing LOW The square of Nine is more deep than this - the positioning can be important too - for instance 1st gann sq of nine chart above in the post, follow the numbering from the 11835 LOW around the square until you get to the swing 2 low of 11704 - its moved out to the next level but on the same line sequence as the low and up nearly opposite the first low of 11952 and within pips of a major intersection  I can tell you that most markets adhere to the square of Nine - however, there's a huge amount of things to look at, consider and apply so we won't go any further into this As with ANY method, do as I've done, test it, if you understand it and it fails, dump it - I could go on showing coincidence after coincidence of the square of nine - I just wanted to show you that there's reasons markets turn at specific points "out of the blue" - you'll get people mentioned support and resistance as throw away comments (usually Fibonacci levels that they don't really understand!)  Successful Trading THT  
×
×
  • Create New...