Jump to content

** Urgent: Dubious Tesla pricing **


MarcBergh

Recommended Posts

Dear community members,

I thought it only prudent to make other members aware of a few rather questionable & significant price drops that occurred on IG’s Tesla stock back on 17 & 19 August (pre-split).  

There may have been other examples of this occurrence on Tesla, or indeed other surging technology stocks, although the below examples are the ones I noticed & reported to IG.

The screen grab examples mentioned below are attached fyi.

1.      Monday 17/08- 9AM open. Price range showing a 17,649.50  point (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen in the market. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?   

2.      Wednesday 19/08- As per the above example, another sharp and large movement down in price, again at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 

Both these price drops weren’t evident on my TradingView screen where I get a direct pre-market price feed from NASDAQ. Furthermore, both price drops were then omitted from IG’s screens soon after they occurred. Rather mysterious.

I wrote to IG asking for an explanation on these price drops, and the omission, where staff from Trading Services told me they were due to a “display error”, and that “The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.”

To be frank, I found these answers given by IG to be both inadequate & unacceptable. This is especially so given the fact these massive price drops didn’t actually happen in the market (NASDAQ), and were omitted by IG soon after they took place.   

As I stated in the below mail trail with IG, clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order, potentially causing considerable financial loss.

Given the potential severity of the issue at hand, I would have thought this would be dealt with professionally & expeditiously by IG, which it hasn’t. Clearly this very skewed pricing wouldn’t fill IG customers with confidence going forward.

I still haven’t been given an update on the developer fix for these “display errors”….

Thoughts welcome, mail trail below with attachments.

Kind regards,

Marc.  

 

** Urgent: Tesla pricing **

 
 
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

 <marcbergh@gmail.com>

AttachmentsWed, 19 Aug, 15:30
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi all, 
 
For the past few days, namely on 17 August & today 19 August, there have been two very large downward price movements in Tesla's stock price at the 9am UK pre-market open. Said price movements then disappear when refreshing the IG screen a few minutes later.
 
I captured both via screen grab, with today's also including the above omission example when refreshing the screen. 
 
Please find attached 3 .JPG files:
 
1.   "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down)"- as the file name suggests, the sharp and large movement down in price this morning at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 
2. "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down)"- the above large downward price movement has clearly disappeared from the screen, no trace of a candle wick at all?
3.  "IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down)"- similar example here on Monday 17/08- price range showing a 17,649.50 (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?
 
These questionable price drops look like a possible flash crash of sorts, although I get a direct feed from NASDAQ into my trading screen on TradingView where I manage my risk, and none of the aforementioned price drops are evident. 
 
Perhaps I have missed something here, but please provide an explanation as to how these prices were generated, and why they were later omitted. Clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order. I'm wanting to trade Tesla going forward but this is not filling me with confidence. 
 
In case you need it, my account ID *****
 
I look forward to your reply.
 
Kind regards,
Marc. "
 
The following day, I then received the below reply from Michael Ye in Trading Services... 
 

Re:** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

20 Aug 2020, 04:30 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
"Dear Mark,

Thanks for your detailed email.

Sorry to hear about your issues with our charts. This is a known issue and our developers are currently looking into this at high priority.

Trades are executed based on the market price, chart is indicative only and in this case a display error.

Case reference: INC0465098

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Alternatively, we've recently launched our new Help & Support site which gives you answers from our huge knowledge-base, online community, and education hub.

Regards,"

Michael Ye
Trading Services

IG

 

To which I replied the following.... 

20 Aug 2020, 11:33 (13 days ago)
 
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi Michael,
 
Thanks for your response. 
 
Trades may be executed based on the market price, but as you well know, risk is modelled, including stop losses, based on volatility/price action of the underlying asset. IG prices shown on the chart therefore directly impact this risk modelling, even if they are indicative. 
 
It could therefore be viewed as unacceptable market practice, for an FCA registered company, on more than one occasion, to have such a massive spread/gap between the prevailing market price & what IG screens are showing. It's highly probable that these "display errors" would directly and negatively impact any customers financially who are long a stock, in this case Tesla. 
 
Please provide an ETA for when your developers will have fixed said "display errors", and what controls are being put in place at IG to ensure this doesn't happen again. 
 
Kind regards,
Marc.  "
 
I then received the below reply from Anton Liebenberg in trading services.... 
 

Re: ** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 / OTCPT-5728

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

Thu, 20 Aug, 16:20 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
 
 
"Dear Marc,

Thanks for your email. The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us."

Regards,
Anton Liebenberg
Trading Services

IG
 

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down).JPG

Link to comment

couple of points to note.

IG data is used to process accounts first and is then sent on to a third party and used to construct the charts, occasionally there may be a glitch in the chart building process causing a spike but usually does not affect your account at all and is redrawn fairly quickly or at least on next market open.

Secondly, if there ever is a problem with your actual account IG have a pretty good record of refunding any loses when reported judging by the years I've spent monitoring this forum.

Link to comment

Casey thanks for your reply. 

When you say "IG data is used to process accounts first", what do you mean by that exactly? Would that be the prevailing market price that Michael @ IG refered to? 

If this is indeed a glitch in the chart building process, or a "display error" as IG states, and would in turn not affect your account at all, including in terms of your risk management (aka- stop loss), then IG should have stated that explicitly. They clearly left that crucial part out. As a trader you can only go by what price you see on the charts. 

Bottom line is it shouldn't take this long to sort this issue out & their comms was poor. I've worked for a number of Fintech firms and this is sub par.    

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, MarcBergh said:

Casey thanks for your reply. 

When you say "IG data is used to process accounts first", what do you mean by that exactly? Would that be the prevailing market price that Michael @ IG refered to? 

If this is indeed a glitch in the chart building process, or a "display error" as IG states, and would in turn not affect your account at all, including in terms of your risk management (aka- stop loss), then IG should have stated that explicitly. They clearly left that crucial part out. As a trader you can only go by what price you see on the charts. 

Bottom line is it shouldn't take this long to sort this issue out & their comms was poor. I've worked for a number of Fintech firms and this is sub par.    

 

I have no direct link with IG or knowledge as to exactly how the system works but going by discussions on the forum over the years including input from IG staff IG's price data is directly linked to accounts and is also sent to the company that actually builds the charts which is IT-Finance. This means that any glitches appearing on the charts that are occur during the chart building process will not automatically adversely affect your account.

The 'prevailing market data' can only be IG's current best bid/offer prices at any particular time and is the data used to trigger account orders.

Occasional false spikes seem to occur on every broker's platform as is reported on social media and usually don't affect an account but sometimes the problem originates further up stream and can do, but any financial discrepancies that do occur and are reported to IG and here on the forum seem to get resolved fairly quickly.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

This is dubious and hopefully not a deliberate systematic foul play from IG?
I sometimes see discrepancies between two trading systems side by side. Will be more watchful.. I experienced something during a CFD transaction but did not have a screenshot. Resulted me into closing my position absorbing some loss. These kind of glitches reduce the confidence and transparency.

Link to comment
18 hours ago, MarcBergh said:

Dear community members,

I thought it only prudent to make other members aware of a few rather questionable & significant price drops that occurred on IG’s Tesla stock back on 17 & 19 August (pre-split).  

There may have been other examples of this occurrence on Tesla, or indeed other surging technology stocks, although the below examples are the ones I noticed & reported to IG.

The screen grab examples mentioned below are attached fyi.

1.      Monday 17/08- 9AM open. Price range showing a 17,649.50  point (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen in the market. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?   

2.      Wednesday 19/08- As per the above example, another sharp and large movement down in price, again at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 

Both these price drops weren’t evident on my TradingView screen where I get a direct pre-market price feed from NASDAQ. Furthermore, both price drops were then omitted from IG’s screens soon after they occurred. Rather mysterious.

I wrote to IG asking for an explanation on these price drops, and the omission, where staff from Trading Services told me they were due to a “display error”, and that “The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.”

To be frank, I found these answers given by IG to be both inadequate & unacceptable. This is especially so given the fact these massive price drops didn’t actually happen in the market (NASDAQ), and were omitted by IG soon after they took place.   

As I stated in the below mail trail with IG, clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order, potentially causing considerable financial loss.

Given the potential severity of the issue at hand, I would have thought this would be dealt with professionally & expeditiously by IG, which it hasn’t. Clearly this very skewed pricing wouldn’t fill IG customers with confidence going forward.

I still haven’t been given an update on the developer fix for these “display errors”….

Thoughts welcome, mail trail below with attachments.

Kind regards,

Marc.  

 

** Urgent: Tesla pricing **

 
 
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

 <marcbergh@gmail.com>

AttachmentsWed, 19 Aug, 15:30
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi all, 
 
For the past few days, namely on 17 August & today 19 August, there have been two very large downward price movements in Tesla's stock price at the 9am UK pre-market open. Said price movements then disappear when refreshing the IG screen a few minutes later.
 
I captured both via screen grab, with today's also including the above omission example when refreshing the screen. 
 
Please find attached 3 .JPG files:
 
1.   "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down)"- as the file name suggests, the sharp and large movement down in price this morning at the 9am open, see blue arrow. I unfortunately didn't highlight the candle to get the specifics, but looks in the region of ~5k points between highest/lowest. 
2. "IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down)"- the above large downward price movement has clearly disappeared from the screen, no trace of a candle wick at all?
3.  "IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down)"- similar example here on Monday 17/08- price range showing a 17,649.50 (11.80%) drop in price, which clearly didn't happen. This price drop is also omitted from later versions of IG's Tesla screen, as can be seen on the previously mentioned 19 August screengrab, when looking at the 4 hour time frame window, there's no price drop to 14,8970?
 
These questionable price drops look like a possible flash crash of sorts, although I get a direct feed from NASDAQ into my trading screen on TradingView where I manage my risk, and none of the aforementioned price drops are evident. 
 
Perhaps I have missed something here, but please provide an explanation as to how these prices were generated, and why they were later omitted. Clearly if you were long Tesla you would have been stopped out unfairly, even with a very flexible stop order. I'm wanting to trade Tesla going forward but this is not filling me with confidence. 
 
In case you need it, my account ID *****
 
I look forward to your reply.
 
Kind regards,
Marc. "
 
The following day, I then received the below reply from Michael Ye in Trading Services... 
 

Re:** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

20 Aug 2020, 04:30 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
"Dear Mark,

Thanks for your detailed email.

Sorry to hear about your issues with our charts. This is a known issue and our developers are currently looking into this at high priority.

Trades are executed based on the market price, chart is indicative only and in this case a display error.

Case reference: INC0465098

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Alternatively, we've recently launched our new Help & Support site which gives you answers from our huge knowledge-base, online community, and education hub.

Regards,"

Michael Ye
Trading Services

IG

 

To which I replied the following.... 

20 Aug 2020, 11:33 (13 days ago)
 
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to IG
cleardot.gif
"Hi Michael,
 
Thanks for your response. 
 
Trades may be executed based on the market price, but as you well know, risk is modelled, including stop losses, based on volatility/price action of the underlying asset. IG prices shown on the chart therefore directly impact this risk modelling, even if they are indicative. 
 
It could therefore be viewed as unacceptable market practice, for an FCA registered company, on more than one occasion, to have such a massive spread/gap between the prevailing market price & what IG screens are showing. It's highly probable that these "display errors" would directly and negatively impact any customers financially who are long a stock, in this case Tesla. 
 
Please provide an ETA for when your developers will have fixed said "display errors", and what controls are being put in place at IG to ensure this doesn't happen again. 
 
Kind regards,
Marc.  "
 
I then received the below reply from Anton Liebenberg in trading services.... 
 

Re: ** Urgent: Tesla pricing ** - INC0465098 / OTCPT-5728

 
 
Inbox
x
 
 
 
profile_mask2.png

helpdesk.uk@ig.com

Thu, 20 Aug, 16:20 (13 days ago)
 
 
cleardot.gif
cleardot.gif
to me
cleardot.gif
 
 
"Dear Marc,

Thanks for your email. The developers are currently working on the project however we don't have a date yet of when a fix will be available. We will inform you once the developers have discovered a solution.

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us."

Regards,
Anton Liebenberg
Trading Services

IG
 

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 19 August (no spike down).jpg

IG Tesla Pricing- 17 August (spike down).JPG

I have found this a lot with IG charts.

Should they offer Trading View or ProRealTime included in the IG trading platform package?

I'd certainly have much more confidence in trading and investing via IG if it did! Am I alone? I sincerely doubt it, there must be hundreds, thousands similarly affected, like you, and myself.

A simple case in point (there are hundreds and hundreds of these....)

ICDU

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF USD

1932208194_Screenshot2020-09-03at09_07_40.thumb.png.9bcd708d266bbc4544aca9b9d31fcaa6.png

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, rwi said:

I have found this a lot with IG charts.

Should they offer Trading View or ProRealTime included in the IG trading platform package?

I'd certainly have much more confidence in trading and investing via IG if it did! Am I alone? I sincerely doubt it, there must be hundreds, thousands similarly affected, like you, and myself.

yes, false spikes do occur on broker platforms and especially so on the demo but as said only very rarely affect actual live accounts.

PRT is available on IG though they are also associated with the chart build firm IT-Finance (as are many other brokers).

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Caseynotes said:

yes, false spikes do occur on broker platforms and especially so on the demo but as said only very rarely affect actual live accounts.

PRT is available on IG though they are also associated with the chart build firm IT-Finance (as are many other brokers).

Yes I saw your comments previously, which I noted. However, I do not agree that it is acceptable for a company like IG and it's aspirations see https://www.iggroup.com/about-us/who-we-are/our-purpose-and-values

It is also not 'cutiing edge like other competitors.

Sooner or later this late of Leadership in charting will become a 'tipping point'. It is merely a finance issue (i.e. management decision making flaw), which I believe they have got wrong. IG's global marketplace simply won't accept it for much longer, despite benign tolerance in home market. I reply merely to give some more credence to the idea. I have no particular wish to challenge your views, which are fine as they are.

I have paid for several hundred pounds with IG in the past of Prorealtime when I wasn't regualrly in the market or using an IG competitor as my main trading platform, yet had over £100k deposited with IG. Not good custoemr service - disrecpectful I'd call it. IG has to work harder. As a company with almost £3billion Market Cap it is simply 'poor performance' masking as something else. Stuart Wheeler, IG's founder, financier and political benefactor, 1935-2020, who died this year aged 85, was a spread betting pioneer. I just can't believe he'd be happy with the knowledge state of IG's customer services, and charting anomalies (whatever hollow excuses and denials are likely to follow)


https://www.ft.com/content/a54be868-232a-45d9-a545-6b7091e5d0ea
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
16 minutes ago, rwi said:

IG's founder, financier and political benefactor, 1935-2020, who died this year aged 85, was a spread betting pioneer. I just can't believe he'd be happy with the knowledge state of IG's customer services, and charting anomalies (whatever hollow excuses and denials are likely to follow)

yes the customer service has been garbage since the start of this 'everyone stay at home and save the nhs' covid farce but then again so has my bank's.

  • Like 1
  • Thought provoking 1
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, dmedin said:

🤔

yes, the usual MO is to howl blue murder on the forum then note there's a complaints procedure, initiate the complaints procedure, then come back on the forum and say 'actually it's all sorted' or not bother and just quietly carry on trading with IG anyway.

In the last 4 years I've only heard of 2 that ended up taking their complaint to the FCA.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
On 03/09/2020 at 16:25, Guest Bal said:

This happens with Microsoft every day.

The following day, these spikes have disappeared.

 

Thanks for your post. 

Sometimes there are incorrect spikes on the platform. This can be down to quotes in the market that were not traded at. If the price isn't traded at we will not close positions off the price. Our technical team do then go and remove any incorrect pricing. 

All the best. 

  • Great! 1
Link to comment

I seen this also and commented on a YT trading channel.  It also happened on Amazon @ $760.......

Oddly enough my IG isn't loading again!  and if it does the charts aren't loading.

Quick update, my Share Dealing platform has defaulted to the Classic again!

Edited by nit2wynit
  • Like 1
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, nit2wynit said:

I seen this also and commented on a YT trading channel.  It also happened on Amazon @ $760.......

Oddly enough my IG isn't loading again!  and if it does the charts aren't loading.

Quick update, my Share Dealing platform has defaulted to the Classic again!

 

Oh, it isn't just me that took a shafting up the tailpipe :(

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      21,617
    • Total Posts
      91,855
    • Total Members
      41,888
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Mhada
    Joined 23/03/23 08:10
  • Posts

    • #GBPCAD: Pullback From Key LevelGBPCAD reached a major horizontal resistance.The price has nicely reacted to that, forming a bearish engulfing candle on 4H time frame.I expect a retracement from the underlined structure.Goals: 1.68 / 1.677
    • #EURUSD: Important Breakout 🇪🇺🇺🇸   Bulls push 🟢EURUSD heavily after yesterday's Interest Rate Decision and FOMC. The price has successfully broken and closed above a solid horizontal supply cluster.   The next solid resistance that I see is 1.099 - 1.103 area. Probabilities will be high that it is the next goal for buyers.   For those, who missed entries, I strictly recommend waiting for a pullback first. I will post an update later on. For Additional confirmation use: Xmaster Formula MT4 Indicator
    • The Nasdaq’s gains are starkly contrasted with relatively weak performances this year from US index peers the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average (Wall Street 30), suggesting some sector rotation has occurred. Source: Bloomberg   Indices Nasdaq-100 S&P 500 Dow Jones Industrial Average Nasdaq Technical analysis  Shaun Murison | Senior Market Analyst, Johannesburg | Publication date: Monday 20 March 2023  The Nasdaq 100 index, after being out of favour in 2022, has managed to produce double digit price gains within the first quarter of 2023. These gains are starkly contrasted with relatively weak performances this year from US index peers the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average (Wall Street 30). The failure of smaller financial counters Silvergate, First Republic and Silicon Valley Banks, has sparked fears around a mini banking crisis prompting weakness in larger banking peers which make up some of the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial index constituents. In turn there is a suggestion that we are now seeing some sector rotation by investors back into technology stocks found within the Nasdaq 100 index. Relative strength comparison: Nasdaq 100 vs S&P 500   Source: IG The chart above shows a ratio comparison of the Nasdaq 100 (numerator) and the S&P500 (denominator) from the beginning of 2022 up until now (20 March 2023). The red trend line (arrow) highlights the downtrend in this ratio which reflects a significant underperformance of the Nasdaq against the S&P500 in 2022. The blue arrow highlights the upward trend of this ratio which began in early 2023. The upward trend now prevalent, highlights the Nasdaq 100’s outperformance of the S&P 500. Relative strength comparison: Nasdaq 100 vs Dow Jones Industrial Average   Source: IG Similarly, to our previous chart (Nasdaq100 / SP500) the above chart of the Nasdaq 100 (numerator) and Dow Jones Industrial Average (denominator) ratio highlights these same trends, i.e. in 2022 Nasdaq 100 consistently underperformed the Dow, while in 2023 that trend appears to have reversed. Year to date index moves compared   Source: IG Albeit from a lower base, the Nasdaq 100 has outperformed its benchmark peers the S&P500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average significantly in 2023. Nasdaq 100 – Technical analysis Source: IG As highlighted in a previous article, the 50-day simple moving average (50MA) (green line) has recently crossed above the 200-day simple moving average (200MA) (blue line). This moving average crossover is commonly referred to as the ‘golden cross’ in technical analysis terms. The suggestion is that it marks the beginning of a new longer-term uptrend in a market, in this case the Nasdaq 100. While we have seen some short-term gains to follow in the index, the Nasdaq 100 does now also trade in overbought territory. The overbought signal suggests that trend followers looking for long entry might be afforded an opportunity to do so through either a near term price pullback or sideways consolidation.   Source: IG The price break above resistance at 12350, now sees this level as possible support, should a pullback ensue. Traders supporting the long-term uptrend might look for long entry on a pullback to either this level or trend line (solid black line) support. Preferably a pullback would need to end with a bullish reversal (candle) pattern. In this scenario, 12900 and 13190 provide initial resistance targets, while a close below the reversal low might be used as a stop loss indication for the trade.
×
×
  • Create New...