Jump to content

Recommended Posts

moving stop to 10915

 

one fake support level after another getting engineered for subsequent stop hunting...

Share this post


Link to post

long at 10877.3, g. stop 10775 (demo account)

Share this post


Link to post

target infinity...

;) 

rationale:  Fed...

not investment advice

 

Share this post


Link to post

short 10827.2 (demo) g. stop 10905

Share this post


Link to post

expecting selloff into the close, after pretty bearish price and volume action

Share this post


Link to post

200823.thumb.png.6bf41fa407bfbca2e9ca26d8c58f99ca.png

 

calling it a day

 

(demo...)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

remind me that 10800-10900 seems to be an important range...

interesting close, relatively quiet given action 15-10 minutes earlier..

Share this post


Link to post

trying overnight long with tight stop...:

 

253281539_USTech100Cash(1)_20200923_16_09.thumb.png.6b27c3e406a6b7c87d212524246f467d.png

 

(lotto...)

;)

 

Share this post


Link to post

fell into the whipsaw trap after closing the first short

Share this post


Link to post

fake bottoming pattern...  7 green candles in a row till slightly above previous high, with low volume... then sudden reversal...  should have been clear then that something has changed...  (like some large trader switching to whipsawing suckers...) and that this was likely not going anywhere anymore today...:

1130878540_USTech100Cash(1)_20200923_16_36.thumb.png.1ea6164a6f96ed22b31f394d4b176e78.png

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

...think I just hi-jacked this thread that I had started...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

short with (dangerously) tight stop - if stop not hit before, review around 11100.  betting on NDX being pulled down a bit by expected retracement of Dax overnight move, plus upper end of recent range should provide some resistance.  (positioned on global equity indices breakout with other trades so this bet on the range holding should have at least some hedging quality (ultra-)short-term - although with the tight stop it's better described as a pretty high-loss-probability gamble...)

 

711251236_USTech100_20200928_00_47.thumb.png.c8576229aa0bc5c41b4b32555eac6f04.png

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, HMB said:

short with (dangerously) tight stop - if stop not hit before, review around 11100.  betting on NDX being pulled down a bit by expected retracement of Dax overnight move, plus upper end of recent range should provide some resistance.  (positioned on global equity indices breakout with other trades so this bet on the range holding should have at least some hedging quality (ultra-)short-term - although with the tight stop it's better described as a pretty high-loss-probability gamble...)

 

711251236_USTech100_20200928_00_47.thumb.png.c8576229aa0bc5c41b4b32555eac6f04.png

 

Well, that looks reasonable.  

It's pure gamble though.  Some would argue that shorting the U.S. indices is inherently dumb because over time they only ever go up.  Even this year, 'the worst EVAR since the Great Depression', they 'only' went down for a few weeks and despite the enormous downward move fully recovered within a few months.  People with money in S&P 500 ETFs are laughing all the way to the bank compared to retail traders.

Also you've got way too much cruft on your charts.  Technical 'analysts' smear their charts with poo to make themselves look clever.  But in reality it's all just useless cr@p.  For example you don't need MFI and volume, because MFI is just volume-weighted RSI.

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post
On 24/09/2020 at 04:27, HMB said:

stop hit

Don't worry, it happens to at least 76% of retail traders - over and over and over again till they have no money left :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 23/09/2020 at 21:42, HMB said:

...think I just hi-jacked this thread that I had started...

Tom has a bee in his bonnet about that :D 

Share this post


Link to post

thanks dmedin

 

anyone knows what happened here...:

NDX_other_reportable.png.edae6a828cebac08fbb01b2f3aae4b10.png

?

 

if I'm not completely mistaken, this is a net short of almost 43b USD notional - probably largest ever, solely in a category that usually doesn't seem to matter at all (corporate treasuries, central banks, small banks...) (aggregate hedge funds and insdt. asset managers both long...)

http://quiktweet.com/105059

is Softbank in that category..?

 

 

Edited by HMB

Share this post


Link to post

...a lot of indecisiveness around 11350 yesterday (which also had not held pre-market)... then strong up candle (15 min) into the cash close...  a bit back into ETFs after recent outflows..?...  doesn't look like the overnight rise can be considered as particularly sustainable IMHO..  Dax and NKY futures also off the highs...  expecting NDX (future) to approach 11350 soon again..:

 

373903169_USTech100_20200929_02_29.thumb.png.c0a351df12cf9bbcd1d83f6c50f518d8.png   

Edited by HMB

Share this post


Link to post
42 minutes ago, HMB said:

...a lot of indecisiveness around 11350 yesterday (which also had not held pre-market)... then strong up candle (15 min) into the cash close...  a bit back into ETFs after recent outflows..?...  doesn't look like the overnight rise can be considered as particularly sustainable IMHO..  Dax and NKY futures also off the highs...  expecting NDX (future) to approach 11350 soon again..:

 

373903169_USTech100_20200929_02_29.thumb.png.c0a351df12cf9bbcd1d83f6c50f518d8.png   

closed at 11370.5

Share this post


Link to post
19 hours ago, HMB said:

thanks dmedin

 

anyone knows what happened here...:

NDX_other_reportable.png.edae6a828cebac08fbb01b2f3aae4b10.png

?

 

if I'm not completely mistaken, this is a net short of almost 43b USD notional - probably largest ever, solely in a category that usually doesn't seem to matter at all (corporate treasuries, central banks, small banks...) (aggregate hedge funds and insdt. asset managers both long...)

http://quiktweet.com/105059

is Softbank in that category..?

 

 

 

 

ETFs catching up to the correction, possibly.

This is all building up for a huge rally at the end of the year.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, dmedin said:

ETFs catching up to the correction, possibly.

could be - I would be a bit surprised though, because if ETFs were considered in this category ("Other Reportable"), I would have expected larger numbers earlier as well (below chart with longer history)

NDX_other_reportable_full.thumb.png.5835611b252b632775f6ae8b0c0ad6b2.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Yes, not too sure about that either.  It's a good find.   Haven't seen anything like it before.

The volume at the top was absolutely gigantic, dwarfing even the volumes at the March/April bottom

NujRglPv

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, dmedin said:

Yes, not too sure about that either.  It's a good find.   Haven't seen anything like it before.

The volume at the top was absolutely gigantic, dwarfing even the volumes at the March/April bottom

NujRglPv

...yes, I looked elsewhere at the COT history since end 1999 - nothing even close to that (neither if you include the standard futures, not only the E-minis).  in the older CFTC classification (commercial vs. non-commercial) you see the non-commercial (i.e. speculative) positioning is the 2nd most net short ever - zerohedge has been reporting about that for some time

...good point on the volume! is that from the exchange?  on IG spreadbetting it looks different

at that time were the rumors about dealers  (un-)hedging options from Softbank and retail traders caused the action...  which OCC data couldn't confirm (see post a while ago) - because dealers' aggregate net volume wasn't that large - it was all in the "Customer" category.

...trying to make sense of these two developments together...  the Other Reportable position is as of 22nd and was built up over four weeks...  so the initial trades could have contributed to the selloff - maybe later the desks in charge of it improved the execution and it slowed down...

still struggling what that could mean for the near future...  tend to agree with your point, that unwind of that position would be a nice way to engineer a rally...  would be quite expensive, though, unless the silently within the boundaries of ineffective laws colluding Wall Street guys get the market to drop first (by triggering all kinds of signals for retail traders and Algos to jump on - think I've heard the 50-day MA is quite popular these days...,  (and Morgan Stanley sees a test of the 200 day MA as possible if I remember correctly...)

...

still more questions than "answers" I mean hypotheses..

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

...consumer confidence leaked...?

 

1429035698_USTech100_20200929_09_47.thumb.png.c5e1bf604dc78055ae1cf209c68e46e4.png

Share this post


Link to post

+213 at 13:51:43,  +351 at 13:51:53...

351_213.png.88702cdd679d04a9d54033830628bc92.png

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,742
    • Total Posts
      65,414
    • Total Members
      86,177
    Newest Member
    rpd2
    Joined 20/10/20 20:14
  • Posts

    • this probably should have been ignored, but IMHO it was a new low.  obviously jlz tried to help someone here, and referred to others to add emphasis to a point.  I'm writing this because I actually asked for support in my earlier response, and I'm very pleased I'm not the only one who reacted to this post thoughtfully, so I think it would be pretty weak if I didn't speak up here. That may make me look ridiculous, and like my tongue is now travelling through a bunch of cracks, but I don't give a **** (like I think you would not either).    I'm actually surprised that you @dmedin  left it to this statement - usually you're significantly more effective in warning people of the hazards we face as retail punters IMHO - I think you definitely had stronger moments. you know what I would find useful:  having a separate, focused thread for insults  - I'm sure by now the respective targets wouldn't mind (to not again say not give a ****), and other discussions could become - let's say "leaner". I genuinely think I got a lot of valuable insights from many of your posts here, and I highly appreciate the honest feedback, and I also believe you have good intentions. I don't know about any history between you, jlz, THT, and Caseynotes.  I further think you play an important role here in this forum and I look forward to more productive discussions with you. But the post quoted above was a new low.     
    • Wall Street holding up still 🤔  
    • I'd given up on Dax but here it comes!  
×
×