Jump to content

Trailing Stops on Contingent Orders


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was wondering if there was any reason that trailing stops cannot be set on contingent orders? I cannot always be at my machine to convert a stop to a trailing stop when the order is triggered. 

 

Is there any possibility this feature can be added please?

 

Cheers

CB

Link to post
  • 4 months later...

You are not the only one who would like this. I'd like to be able to place an order to open with a trailing stop loss with steps so as to be able to snatch a few pips if things go the way that I predicted. Is there any reason why this is not available? It seems odd to be able to set an order to trade when you are not able to be in front of a computer screen but then not to have the same tools available so you then have to be tied to the computer just in case your order gets triggered. Makes 'order to open' a bit pointless

Link to post

Hi  and , welcome both to our Community!

 

Not just trailling stops on orders to open, but trailing stops in general have always been something we've been looking at improving on our platform.

 

I've just spoken with one of our platform developers and they've informed me that this is definately something that's currently in the pipeline to be developed. So whilst i can't really give an ETA, it is on the roadmap. 

 

Hope this helps!

 

Link to post

Hi LukeM,

If possible I would also like to see a combination guaranteed stop and trailing stop? So that your guaranteed stop is your absolute bottom line risk exposure, but a trailing stop works from that point, so if your trailing stop is gapped your guaranteed stop is your ultimate safety net. (I know I want my cake and eat it too). Is this possible? I know the mechanics would be harder, but I'm sure attractive to many traders if offered. 

Link to post

Thanks for your suggestion ,

 

I can see why you would like to have this feature offered on our trading platform and will pass your suggestion on to our development team.

 

The problem I see however, is that guaranteed risk stop distances are subject to change. For example, on all our indices the minimum distances change between in-hours and out-of-hours. For our Germany 30 this minimum guaranteed distance currently changes from 30 points in-hours to 120 points out-of-hours. This distance could be even increased further than 120 points during periods of very high volatility. Because of these ever-changing guaranteed stop minimum distances it is hard to implement a guaranteed trailing stop.

 

Let's assume you would place a guaranteed trailing stop in-hours with a distance of 30 points, it wouldn't be possible for our system to amend this position out-of-hours once the minimum distance was changed to 120 points.

 

I hope my explanation makes sense.

 

Nevertheless, I will pass on your suggestion and hope we can find a solution for this in the near future.

Link to post
  • 6 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Hi , thanks for posting on this thread.

 

Could you clarify exactly where you feel our stop technology is poor so that we can look into it for you?

 

IG certainly don't profit when clients' stops are hit, we instead charge commission and spreads on trades.

 

Looking forward to further information from you, thanks.

Hannah

Link to post
  • 5 weeks later...

After reading your response in my mind a trailing guaranteed stop still makes sense.

If the distance increases after hours from 30 to 120 the STOP level will remain the same...
As soon the market open again when is back to 30 the the trailing guaranteed stop will do the job.

Link to post

Hi ,

 

Thanks for your feedback on this subject - it's certainly something I'm happy to pass on to our developers to consider building into the platform, but not something I can guarantee right now I'm afraid.

 

Please do keep your comments and discussion coming!

 

Thanks,

Hannah

Link to post
  • 6 months later...

Hi Stef,

Sorry I've been offline for quite awhile.

You are correct Stef. That was what I was asking for. Trailing Stop (non-guaranteed) combined with Guaranteed Stop (fixed). 

Nem.

Link to post
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,656
    • Total Posts
      68,264
    • Total Members
      57,144
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    ichimaru8989
    Joined 17/01/21 22:50
  • Posts

    • I'll try to be concise: Dent was in 2010 calling for the mother of all stock market crashes - so were Elliott Wave International in fact EWI have been call for a massive collapse since 1986!  Some of what he says is accurate - deflation for example - the reason QE has not caused inflation is because it was issued in a deflationary cycle The crash he talks about won't happen - I listened to dent and EWI back in 2010 and I choose to do my own research as other things i was investigating suggested the opposite to what they were both spouting Read my Time Cycles page, it explains the deflationary/inflationary cycles - proven with 220+ years of stock market history behind the reasoning The deflationary cycle he refers to ended late 2016, its now inflationary according to my calcs and research and my prediction is stock market is going upwards until the mid 2030's when it will crash and top out - yet Dent still thinks its in play Up until then we might get a 1987 style crash event but overall the corrections will be modest not massive and they will all be quickly surpassed I don't listen to anyone out there - I trade independently according to my methods so I don't need to be buying and holding and if I'm wrong so be it - it won't affect my trading as the market dictates my positions, not my expectations - since 2010 this has work exceptionally well, where if I'd of followed EWI and Dents forecasts I'd of lost everything in 2010! I've no thoughts on Gold other than it is inflationary hedge - as mentioned on another thread when the stock market is inflationary (which I think started 2017) then price correlation backwards to last time it was inflationary (1982-2000) gold was subdued    
    • Thanks @Caseynotes. Do you think the time of the daily close bears any significance. When viewing the hourly charts, the volume and movements seem to be higher in GMT "working hours" and then slow down overnight. Therefore, are other countries trading on GMT I wonder?
    • Saw a snippet on Sky news complaining that the Lateral Flow test must be faulty because it wasn't picking up as many positives as the PCR. Quite an unbelievable misinterpretation of the data on the number of false positives made by the PCR. Not surprising really as the fake positive numbers generated by the PCR are the only thing driving project fear and lockdowns. Meanwhile, in order to stem the flow of staff needing to self isolate following a PCR false positive the NHS are switching to ...  er, the lateral flow test.         Dr Clare Craig  @ClareCraigPath Deaths are not climbing commensurate with cases. Either COVID got less deadly (despite inc hospital admissions) or we have two measure a) a community positive rate off the charts with false positives b) a hospital rate (likely to inc some real COVID) which is at a steady state     .
×
×
  • Create New...