-
Member Statistics
-
Total Topics12,742
-
Total Posts65,414
-
Total Members86,176
-
-
-
Posts
-
this probably should have been ignored, but IMHO it was a new low. obviously jlz tried to help someone here, and referred to others to add emphasis to a point. I'm writing this because I actually asked for support in my earlier response, and I'm very pleased I'm not the only one who reacted to this post thoughtfully, so I think it would be pretty weak if I didn't speak up here. That may make me look ridiculous, and like my tongue is now travelling through a bunch of cracks, but I don't give a **** (like I think you would not either).   I'm actually surprised that you @dmedin  left it to this statement - usually you're significantly more effective in warning people of the hazards we face as retail punters IMHO - I think you definitely had stronger moments. you know what I would find useful: having a separate, focused thread for insults - I'm sure by now the respective targets wouldn't mind (to not again say not give a ****), and other discussions could become - let's say "leaner". I genuinely think I got a lot of valuable insights from many of your posts here, and I highly appreciate the honest feedback, and I also believe you have good intentions. I don't know about any history between you, jlz, THT, and Caseynotes. I further think you play an important role here in this forum and I look forward to more productive discussions with you. But the post quoted above was a new low.   -
-
-
