Jump to content

Technical Analysis on ASX300 listed companies


CrossLines

Recommended Posts

Hey traders,
What an exciting time to trade ASX right now!
I'm interested in starting a group for ideas for technical analysis for trading on ASX300 listed companies and ETF... trying to build on my portfolio.
 
Working together we have more eyes on the market and hopefully a better return!
 
Here we go:
today's trade 
Long on GDX.ASX
Candles looking Bullish, possible bounce from trendline. Good 9% return. 3.3 RvR
 

Screen Shot 2020-11-13 at 2.57.03 pm.png

  • Like 1
Link to post

CMM.ASX in a good buy zone. 2Hr candles showing bullish reaction to support price level and simultaneously showing good reaction to TL (trendline). Fundamentals with solid backing. It's a buy for me. Will set SL (stop loss) should price break thru support or TL. (4hr candle close with clear break)

Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 2.23.20 pm.png

Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 2.22.47 pm.png

Edited by CrossLines
Link to post

LYC.ASX SOLD this week, (completion of previous inverted head and shoulders and price has reached a major resistance on weekly chart) will wait for a potential retest of neckline (support zone) then buy again and compound those gains. We all know Lynas for its bull run potential (looking at historical data form 2009, reaction to recession, when prices reached $26). Fundamentals looks solid, now it's a technical play to the top with opportunities to compound the gains. SL (stop loss) alert set up just under major support.

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 3.01.51 pm.png

Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 2.55.50 pm.png

Edited by CrossLines
Link to post
On 14/11/2020 at 14:27, CrossLines said:

I'm not very convinced with this rejection, but I've gone long anyways... placing a tight SL just in case. lower timeframes looking ok, but 4h hasn't presented well at close... it could be a H&S pattern in action, time will tell. I would love  a second opinion on this one. 

 

Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 2.22.47 pm.png

 

cmm.png

Edited by CrossLines
Link to post
  • 3 weeks later...
On 04/12/2020 at 19:52, Tradebot said:

Hi ,do you always prefer low time frames and if so why? Does it make for easier targets perhaps?

 

Hi Tradebot,

My preferred timeframe for analysis would be H4, but I do use lower timeframes for confirmation of reaction to a particular target. I find equally important to verify Daily and Weekly.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,747
    • Total Posts
      68,534
    • Total Members
      57,395
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    nigeszkut
    Joined 24/01/21 07:20
  • Posts

    • Take 10 minutes to read what actual 'experts' are saying about this latest Ferguson Fiasco and how the testing is currently being done.   ...on the oFPR, I commend to you that you disregard the daily “X thousands of new infections yesterday” headlines. These reports are just not true. These statements assume (if they’ve thought about it at all) that the oFPR is zero, which it certainly isn’t. That value could...    Thread by @MichaelYeadon3 on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
    • Speaking of depressingly low 'levels of intelligence' the UK govt and SAGE sink to new depths. The govt now desperately trying to back track out of outright propaganda lies.     Reaction  @reactionlife Breaking: 30 per cent more lethal claim rests on “fragile and uncertain evidence”, says NERVTAG member. "NERVTAG has expressed limited confidence in this figure, which should not be the basis for public alarm." - Reported by @alastair_benn: 30 per cent more lethal claim rests on "fragile and uncertain evidence", says NERVTAG member - Reaction  
×
×
  • Create New...