Jump to content
  • 0

Margin requirements for 10-year treasuries seem too high


Lunar

Question

Is there a problem with how much margin is required for CFDs on 10 year Treasuries? To buy or sell one contract (the $2 contract) more than $5000 of margin is required. That's more than I have available, but I'm sure I've traded CFDs on them before. Have the margin requirements changed?

  • Like 1
Link to post

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes the margin seems far to high - it is margining based on the underlying futures notional, not the actual risk. For example a 1bp move in treasury yield is 8.3pts in the decimal of the future price, i.e. 1 full $10 contract is only $83 per bp, a normal day could be only 4bp, the margin seems far to high for these contracts. I see the same with Bunds.

Bloomberg states initial margin for 10yr USTs is only $1.5k per contract (100k face value notional / $10 per point).

Also, I have noticed that even with a guaranteed stop in place the margin does not decrease to what the contract specifications say it should (size * contract size * stop distance + guaranteed stop premium).

Can someone from IG please take a look at this, it is impossible to trade rates/bond futures using these margins.

Thank you

Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      15,129
    • Total Posts
      73,141
    • Total Members
      61,456
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    stewasx
    Joined 07/05/21 04:06
  • Posts

    • Hi - there's nothing wrong with having target level(s) - If it works it works Just remember as in chart 1 above, if the market is going UP then it will create a series of higher lows and higher highs and one can trail the market up by simply using the swing low points - because if the market is trending upwards it ain't going to hit a swing low point until it needs a rest, changes degree or the trend is changing That's a major law of the market (vice versa for it going  down and for sideways ranges overlapping of swings)  The blue dots on chart 1 show you the times the presumed swing low/low didn't work out
    • Thanks THT, yes well i do estimate my possible returns by estimating a target price.  Of course if the market doesn't get there then i've got several smaller rolling losses to deal with and i've not figured out yet how i make up for that if it turns out i'm wrong.  I'm currently not using a trailing stop for simplicity and the sake of not adding another variable into the mix.  However, I imagine that only having a binary situation where the market either hits the stop or target is too simplistic in a fluid market..
×
×
  • Create New...