Jump to content
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

PRT Screener 50 Result Limit

Question

Let me start by sating that I really like PRT and think its an excellent charting package. Its one of the few that I have seen that offers this many details and features, especially as a charting platform made available to all customers. There are other brokers out there who's premium don't offer any where near what PRT offers. It is one of the reasons I really like IG (among others!).

 

However, for me personally there is a issue with the cap on the results provided by the screener. I'm aware that this likely wont effect all users or those who trade a specific basket of instruments. I also acknowledge IG aren't the developers of the software but there must be a way to request a small additional feature be added to future releases.

 

For those who are unaware. The screener in PRT only shows the top 50 results. It will however display a number hits but only displays the top 50 according to the strongest matches of your criteria. For me, who swing trades I have programmed into the screener the lead-up price action I'm looking for but I still want to be able to cycle through and pick the strongest trades using my discretion.

 

A common situation is that from 50 of the results I may add 5-10 to my watchlist as strong potential trades. However according to PRT Screener there can be anywhere from 50-300 additional matches which I am unable to view (depending on the exchange). If It is displaying the number of matches then its obviously parsing those stocks but being told the number of matches then only seeing 50 is a bit of a tease. I would be ok if it only showed 50 results but I could go to the next page and see the next 50 if that is a solution. 

 

Again i have made an effort to modify the screener code as much as I am comfortable doing to refine the filter and this has worked but its simply not possible to reduce the number to under 50 results (in some cases) without missing setups. I have also setup the screeners to screen each exchange seperatley and even short and long setups seperatley which adds to the time but helps show more. It would be nice to just scan all the markets you tick in one go (and be reasonably able to show that many). It's a little bit unrealistic to return <=50 results when you have potentially tens of thousands of stocks, currency pairs & commodities etc.

 

It seems like a fairly simple one and my hope is that the team at IG would be able to put in a request with the developer to add an option to show more, at the very least add a 'next 50 results' button as its clear the screener is capable of detecting the additional matches.

 

If this is a feature that others would like to see included please feel free to post here so the staff at IG are aware its a wanted feature.

 

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thank you for suggesting this improvement Finite.

 

I agree entirely, in my humble opinion, this is one of the sub-optimal features of the PRT screener.

 

I would also benefit if Finite's suggestion was implemented. My screens also often bring up far more than 50 results so I miss out on potential set-ups too!   

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,620
    • Total Posts
      39,070
    • Total Members
      49,233
    Newest Member
    alexserfu
    Joined 17/10/19 17:13
  • Posts

    • Hi everyone,  so, those of you following my FTSE - Daily Trades thread may know, I'm looking for new strategies to tackle the market. Was starting to think about this today and made a few thoughts. First one I came up with in the process is the following and utilises 'Andrew's Pitchfork' a rather odd name for a simple principle.   Thought Process I was going back to the basics and starting to think about the fundamentals of trading: Buy low and sell high. Or go short high, and buy back low later. So the key of my new strategy has to somewhat depended on these fundamental trading principles. Next I was thinking, looking at a chart, in what region can the price considered to be "low" and in what region would I consider it to be "high". I was looking at a 5min chart and looking at the whole day. I was drawing one line at the low of day, one line at the high of day, those are obviously the extremes where everyone can agree prices are low / high. Then I draw a line right in the middle between the two, where the price is neither high nor low. Then I draw a line at 25% and one at 75% and said, if the price is between the low of day (0%) and 25%, I consider the price to be low. If the price is between 75% and high of day (100%) I consider the price to be high. In between (25%-75%), it's neither high nor low. If I'd somehow manage to always buy in the low range and sell in the high range (or go short vice versa), then this could be a decent strategy. The next problem I was facing is, I've done this analysis on the previous day, where we know high and low of day. How can this strategy work out for future price movements, where high and low of day are unknown. Andrew's Pitchfork This is where the Pitchfork comes in. The assumption I'm making is that if I extrapolate the 4 required levels (low of day, high of day, 25% and 75%) from the previous day to the following day, the strategy still works. This is because more often than not, prices move up and down around a certain level, without breaking away from it and moving onto the next level. (This obviously has to be proven with data - more to that later) The way the pitchfork works is exactly how the 4 required levels are drawn up. The pitchfork is defined over 3 points: High, Low and Mid-point. It then draws 5 levels on the chart: High (100%), 75%, Mid (50%), 25%, Low (0%) So how does it work The way I imagine it to work is the following: 1) Identify previous day's high and low 2) Draw the pitchfork in the chart with aligning its high and lows on the daily high and low. The mid point is exactly in the middle of daily high and low. This draws a horizontal pitchfork in the chart. 3) When the price of the asset falls below 25%, place a buy stop order at the 25% level. Once the price rises again and breaks through that level, the order gets executed. (vice versa with shorting above the 75% level) 4) Stop Loss is right below (size of the spread) the low of the pitchfork. Target is somewhere above 50%-75%. You have at least a 1:1 risk-to-reward ratio. Need to calculate target level by asset based on historic patterns. Does it work? Don't know yet. So far I've manually painted a few of those pitchforks in the chart for the past couple of days on FTSE100, NASDAQ, CL and NG and it seems it works more often than it doesn't. Cases where it clearly doesn't work is when there's a strong move to either direction, aka price breaks-out and moves to a different level than it was the day before. Interestingly when this happens, the strategy wouldn't necessarily always result in a loss, but sometimes the entry conditions would never be triggered in the first place. E.g. if we start the day already in the high region (above 75%) and then never fall below it - no order triggered on that day. On the negative side, huge breakout opportunities are missed with this strategy, so worth looking into a complementary strategy which works specifically for break-outs. Next steps Next, I'm trying to backtest the strategy. Will need to pull a whole lot of data and analyse. Hope to have that done over the weekend. Will update the thread accordingly. Data I'm trying to get: Win ratio, Where's the optimum take profit level, Time of day where this usually plays out (my idea is to hook this in with the ATR analysis I've done and trade this pattern at times of high ATR, aka FTSE, DAX in the morning, NASDAQ, NG, CL in the afternoon)  First success First successful example trade taken this afternoon on CL. You see nicely how the pitchfork is drawn on the chart and is derived by the high and low of the previous day. At 14.30 today the price dipped below the 25% level. I set the buy stop order at the 25% level, which got triggered at 14.35. The price afterwards makes a sweep move up to the 50% level, where my limit sell order gets triggered at 15.15. It would've been possible to play it up until the 75% level, but wanted to be safe, without having the data yet. Could've been luck - who knows.   What do you think of this approach?        
    • just to add to bigdeal's reply SBs can be either cash/daily funded bet or futures/forward which have a separate chart accessed from the dropdown box next to the chart title. for cash/dfb there is no expiry but you paid an overnight interest fee, this charge does not apply to futures/forwards which have a larger spread instead. see pic.
    • https://www.home.saxo/insights/content-hub/articles/2019/10/17/emerging-market-stocks-just-break-out-of-a-20-month-downtrend
×
×