Jump to content

Harmonic Patterns

Recommended Posts



Advantages & Disadvantages of Harmonic Patterns


Provide future projections and stops in advance, making them leading indicators

Frequent, repeatable, reliable and produce high probable setups

Trading rules are relatively standardized using Fibonacci ratios

Work well with defined Market Context, Symmetry and Measured Moves rules

Work in all timeframes and in all market instruments

Other indicator theories (CCI, RSI, MACD, DeMark…) can be used along with them


Complex and highly technical, making it difficult to understand

Correct identification and automation (coding) of harmonic patterns is difficult

Conflicting Fibonacci retracements/projections can create difficulty in identifying reversal or projection zones

Complexity arises when opposing patterns form from either the same swings or other swings/timeframes

Risk/reward factors from non-symmetric and low-ranked patterns are pretty low

How to Trade Harmonic Patterns and

Pattern Identification

Harmonic patterns can be a bit hard to spot with the naked eye, but, once a trader understands the pattern structure, they can be relatively easily spotted by Fibonacci tools. The primary harmonic patterns are 5-point (Gartley, Butterfly, Crab, Bat, Shark and Cypher) patterns. These patterns have embedded 3-point (ABC) or 4-point (ABCD) patterns. All the price swings between these points are interrelated and have harmonic ratios based on Fibonacci. Patterns are either forming or have completed “M”- or “W”-shaped structures or combinations of “M” and “W,” in the case of 3-drives. Harmonic patterns (5-point) have a critical origin (X) followed by an impulse wave (XA) followed by a corrective wave to form the “EYE” at (B) completing AB leg. Then followed by a trend wave (BC) and finally completed by a corrective leg (CD). The critical harmonic ratios between these legs determine whether a pattern is a retracement-based or extension-based pattern, as well as its name (Gartley, Butterfly, Crab, Bat, Shark, and Cypher). One of the significant points to remember is that all 5-point and 4-point harmonic patterns have embedded ABC (3-Point) patterns.


All 5-point harmonic patterns (Gartley, Butterfly, Crab, Bat, Shark, Cypher) have similar principles and structures. Though they differ in terms of their leg-length ratios and locations of key nodes (X, A, B, C, D), once you understand one pattern, it will be relatively easy to understand the others. It may help for traders to use an automated pattern recognition software to identify these patterns, rather than using the naked eye to find or force the patterns.


Example: The following chart shows an example of the Bullish Bat pattern with embedded the ABC Bearish pattern. The identification pivots and ratios are marked on the pattern; the pattern also shows the entry, stop and target levels.




Trade Identification

In harmonic pattern setups, a trade is identified when the first 3 legs are completed (in 5-point patterns). For example, in Gartley Bullish pattern, the XA, AB and BC legs are completed and it starts to form the CD leg, you would identify a potential trade may be in the works. Using the projections and retracements of the XA and BC legs, along with the Fibonacci ratios, we can build a price cluster to identify a potential Pattern Completion Zone (PCZ) and D point of the pattern.



Pattern Completion Zone (PCZ)

All harmonic patterns have defined Pattern Completion Zones (PCZ). These PCZs, which are also known as price clusters, are formed by the completed swing (legs) confluence of Fibonacci extensions, retracements and price projections. The patterns generally complete their CD leg in the PCZ, then reverse. Trades are anticipated in this zone and entered on price reversal action.


As an example, the Pattern Completion Zone (PCZ) for the Bullish Gartley pattern is constructed using the following Fibonacci extensions and projections:


0.78 XA


1.27 BC


1.62 BC




Market Context Conditions

Most technical traders use chart analysis with market context concepts to trade. Market context concept is described as how current price is reacting to certain levels (pivots, support and resistance, MAs), how indicators are performing relative to historic price conditions (like oversold, overbought) and where/how patterns are developing in the current timeframe or multiple timeframes, etc. Each trader develops his own market context to trade. One of the elegant ways to define market context is through a Fibonacci Grid structure.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Joined 09/08/22 12:10
  • Posts

    • It is still a wonder to me that Central banks do NOT get it, and perhaps industry. Yes, wage increase pressures are present. That SHOULD BE EXPECTED. Yes, companies have reasons to increase their prices. That too IS EXPECTERD. WHY? PRIMARY FACT: Central Banks have FAILED TO CONTROL INFLATION. THERE IS NO GETTING AROUND IT WITH JUSTIFICATIONS. Taking up various "toxic debts" of banks and companies does not solve excess money printing (now called QE). This only transfer's somebody else's debts onto the government side with no exchange in return, and then getting general bond holders to pay part of it by charging negative interest rates. The culprits who CAUSED THE TOXIC DEBITS go scotch free and it encourages them to maintain such bad practices. It is ODD no central banker thinks of things like this that is SO important. So remind me, what are they professional in? Governments are supposed to take care of the general population's financial welfare, not private industries. Handle the excess money printing, you handle the inflation. Interest rates having to shoot up is a sign of past mishandlings, e.g., using ultra low interest rates ever so long incorrectly. It IS because of this that purchasing power of the currency is lost. It is BECAUSE OF THIS that individual wages and price increases need to take place, rightly, to keep up with the increase of the cost of living. Yet governments and central banks worry about wage increases and price increases as a menace. And they try to limit wage increase. Price increases occur but then their customers cut-back on spending as they cannot afford as much. This IS AN INVERSION in thinking by officials. It develops a vicious circle. The primary source of the problem is out of mind, yet it has been so well known for decades. SIMPLE BASICS ARE NEGLECTED, OR JUST MISUNDERSTOOD. THIS APPLIES TO ALL CENTRAL BANKS, who seem to be copying each other in actions. Mervyn King, ex-UK central bank chief seems to be the only one who has some understanding on the problems of central bankers. It is understandable the the BoE wishes not to head into recession or reduce significantly the GDP by attempting to control interest rate increase. But that is misguided in my opinion. WHY? Rates level manage the Macro-economics, loans, savings and mortgages level control. It is the individual company's operating condition that is neglected. Each company may be responsible for it but they (some) can act poorly, cut corners, use creative accounting, unethical practices, no cash flow, huge debts, not growing organically, non-profitable, taking too huge a risk, etc... IT IS THIS AT THE MICRO-ECONOMIC LEVEL THAT THE HEALTH OF BUSINESSES ARE NOT GUIDED. When a plane is in operation, takes off and fly's it is in good hands, with good control. When "things" go wrong and the plane is out of control we have bad control (for whatever the reason). Similarly the ECONOMY IS IN BAD CONTROL . Governments and bankers think Marco economics will "solve" everything  --  it comes out in the way they operate. Letting companies borrow until they have the highest debts ever in history is just one sign of 'bad control'. No banker would over loan a household individual more than he / she can pay back. And oh, they are always made to be paid back. Individual companies can over burden themselves with huge debts yet continue as nothing is wrong, no alarms, no worries. That is, until some economic trigger brings it down and cause an expected domino-effect. But bankers are clever there are government subsides, tax-relief, and transfer toxic debts relief plans in existence, then "all should be well"!!!! REALLY? HISTORY TEACHES US DIFFERENTLY. WHAT IS WRONG? For one, you make the taxpayer pay for others loans, costs, expanses, etc... call it what you will. So industry does not pay its own way as a private industry.  Industry then goes back to the same old bad practices. Then, later, they wonder why the average GDP now is not as good as prior to previous recession!!!!! HEY, HAVE YOU NOT REALISED THAT YOU CHOCKED OFF THE BASIC FOUNDATION THAT INVESTING IS BASED ON.   -----   SAVERS AND INVESTORS. The thinking is something like this: No, we  have to have these existing plans. WE GOT TO KEEP SAVERS SPENDING, SPENDING SPENDING ANY WHICH WAY WE CAN FORCE THEM. WHY, IT IS THE DEBTS WE BUILD-UP  -- IT IS TOO MUCH AND HAVE TO PAY THEM OFF SOMEHOW -  WE GOT TO MAKE THEM PAY....... AND GROW THE ECONOMY OUT OF THIS MESS. BESIDES BANKERS WANT THEIR LOANS PAID, AFTER THEY COLLECTED HUGE INTEREST PAYMENTS OVER A LONG PERIOD, AND SO ADVICE GOVERNMENT HOW TO "SOLVE IT". After all these years we are no better off. And all end up suffering. The western countries, at least, are living beyond their means. THIS IS THE DWINDLING SPIRAL. IT HAPPENS OVERS DECADES.  
    • Hi All, Thanks for your posts.  IG will be booking preference shares on a 1 for 1 basis. Thank you - Arvin
    • Still no response by email or on here, can't get through to anyone on the phone. I would say poor communication from IG, but its literally non existent.
  • Create New...