Jump to content

Leverage question Demo vs Live account


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was wondering please if the demo spread betting accounts are using leverage? The reason i ask is that I'm currently working out my risk strategy which involves me using a certain percentage of my capital per spread bet, and would like that same percentage to give me the same potential returns/losses on a live account.

So for example, on a demo account if i place a £1 per point trade on BP to go up i know that if the price goes down by 5 points I'm going to lose £5 (without a stop loss being placed etc)

With a live account though where leverage of 5:1 is applied to stock bets, does that mean that in effect I am going be losing £25 in that same scenario?

Thanks

HL

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
On 14/10/2021 at 13:43, AndaIG said:

Hi @Hampshire321

The demo uses leverage too. So it works on the same principle as the live account. A 1GBP pp trade will equate to a 5 GBP loss if the market moves 5 points against you. 

 All the best 

Anda

But what button do you use for using leverage, because I just see in the demo account that in any trade I place there's not an option for leverage.

Thanks.

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Edgar_707 said:

But what button do you use for using leverage, because I just see in the demo account that in any trade I place there's not an option for leverage.

Thanks.

Hi @Edgar_707,

All Demo accounts are using leverage. The leverage is automatically applied on the the dealing ticket. You can find the margin requirements on the info tab of the dealing ticket : 
image.png

The margin will display on the ticket:
image.png
All our demo accounts are using leverage, there is no toggle on button.

I hope that it helps.

All the best - Arvin

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      23,068
    • Total Posts
      95,500
    • Total Members
      43,686
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Mac
    Joined 04/10/23 03:34
  • Posts

    • Introduction: Following the demise of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) landscape underwent a significant transformation that raised questions about the legitimacy and security of such platforms. As a result, consumers are now demanding greater transparency and protective measures from exchanges to regain their faith. The post-FTX CEX landscape is examined in this paper, with a focus on significant exchanges' actions while also noting important trends. After FTX failed, consumers demanded more openness from CEX, which brought credibility once again into the spotlight. Proof of Reserves (PoR) gained popularity as exchanges tried to convince users that their assets were secure. Although PoR by itself does not ensure solvency, Bitget, OKX, Binance, and other CEX were forced to adopt this approach. Additionally, it became crucial to provide protection funds to give users trust, especially in the event of losses or breaches. Binance upped its protection funds from $735 million to $1 billion, underscoring their dedication to protecting user funds, while Bitget expanded their fund from $200 million to over $300 million. Bitget Shines in the CEX Landscape: Bitget distinguished itself by growing its derivatives volume at the time of FTX's collapse, showing resilience in a challenging market. This exchange's ability to adapt and thrive post-FTX demonstrates its strength in the CEX landscape. Binance retained its dominance, maintaining stable trading volumes despite the FTX fallout, but still faced with regulatory challenges in some regions, forcing it to close its services there. Other exchanges, like OKX, also managed to maintain strong derivatives businesses. However, there was a slight decrease in spot trading volume, with DEX trading remaining relatively stable.   Trends, Legal Landscape, and the Road Ahead:  Most CEXs experienced a decline in derivatives trading volume post-FTX, except for Bitget, which increased its trading volume slightly. This growth highlights Bitget's ability to capture additional volume in a challenging environment. Regulatory challenges, especially in the US, pose significant hurdles for CEXs. Compliance with KYC and AML measures is important, as inadequate safeguards can harm an exchange's reputation. CEXs that actively contribute to the ecosystem gain favour and trust from users. In conclusion, as successful exchanges will continue to adapt, innovate, and prioritize user trust in this evolving and competitive cryptocurrency landscape, which exchange do you think will stand out strong in the coming years? https://research.nansen.ai/articles/decoding-the-cex-landscape-an-in-depth-analysis-of-2023-h1
    • Kinda like the features of this product, it’s quite easy to navigate through and has less complexities. This should be every traders flex 
    • Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge Daily Chart, 4 October 23, NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD) NEOUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Double Corrective Position: Wave (Y) Direction Next higher Degrees: Wave ((B)) of Flat Wave Cancel invalid Level: 5.96 Details: The corrective of wave (Y) Likely move down to 5.94 NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Trading Strategy: A decline below 7.08 makes the triangle complete at 7.68, also the price below the MA200 Line, Overview still is a downtrend, and the price move to wave ((5)) which a last wave before change a trend NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is below the MA200 indicating a downtrend, RSI is a Bearish divergence. TradingLounge Analyst: Kittiampon Somboonsod, CEWA Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here! Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge 4H Chart, 4 October 23, NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD) NEOUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Triangle Position: Wave (E) Direction Next higher Degrees: Wave (4) of Impulse Wave Cancel invalid Level: Details: Weve 4 may be complete and the ptice decline again in wave 5 NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Trading Strategy: A decline below 7.08 makes the triangle complete at 7.68, also the price below the MA200 Line, Overview still is a downtrend, and the price move to wave ((5)) which a last wave before change a trend NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is below the MA200 indicating a downtrend, RSI is a Bearish divergence
×
×
  • Create New...
us