HOW SHOULD WE VIEW LEADERS AND TOP EXECUTES?

[skyreach]

IN LIFE THERE ARE ONLY 3 WAYS TO LOOK AT ANY VIEWS.

YOUR WAY.

THE OTHER PERSON'S WAY.

THE OTHER PEOPLES WAY.

    MORE OFTEN INDIVIDUALS GET WRAPPED UP IN THEIR OWN VIEW BEING RIGHT, EVEN IN THE FACE OF CONTRARY FACTS (IF ALL THE TRUE DATA IS ON THE TABLE).

    WHAT IS IT IN THE HUMAN PSYCHIC THAT MOST OF THE TIME INDIVIDUALS WANT TO MAKE THEMSELVES RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG? SO THERE ARGUMENTS, OR CONFLICTS, OR ADVERSARIAL ACTIONS, OR EVEN LEADING TO WARS BECAUSE OF IT. OUT GOES ANALYTICAL OR RATIONAL THINKING. AND THEN WE END UP WITH HERD THINKING (FOLLOW THE HERD, AS IN INVESTMENT PSYCHOLOGY).

    COMPETITION IS A SEPARATE THING, A GAME IN WHICH BOTH SIDES KNOW THE RULES TO FOLLOW (AS IN FOOTBALL) BUT SOME PLAYERS WILL NOT PLAY BALL AND BREAK THE RULES.

    WE CRITIC SOME IDEA. OPINION OR SOME REPORT OR SOME TYPE OF ANALYSIS, ETC... NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT IF KEPT CONSTRUCTIVE OR IT OFFERS AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION.

    UNTIL THAT IS, INDIVIDUALS GET HYPER EMOTIONAL, OVER GENERALISE, SENSATIONALISE, DEVALUE A PERSON, BLACK PR SOMEONE IN SOME WAY ( TRAITS OF MANY A MEDIA AND SOME NEGATIVE INDIVIDUALS ).

EXAMPLE

Caseynote, in the community section. has found some interesting facts and chart studies. On covid. Key facts seem pretty good. Fame for caseynote!

    However the Politicians or others are “clowns” is missing a serious point beyond the surface. Usually people are clever generally. Doctors and other types of professionals have a big responsibility to shoulder. But do they fail at times? Make errors at times? Misjudge at times? Follow in correct theory or thinking? YES, THEY DO.

    BUT DO THEY DOGGEDLY INSIST ON USING A THEORY, A PRACTICE, METHOD OR IDEOLOGY EVEN WHEN TIME AFTER TIME IT HAS EITHER NOT WORKED AND NOT CREATE A POSITIVE RESULT HONESTLY, NOR AN EFFECTIVE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM?

    The problem is THE RECEIVING PROFESSIONALS DO NOT SEE THE STUDIES WHICH IS TAKEN FROM OTHER ORIGINAL PROFESSIONALS EVALUATIONS, WHICH IS BASED ON THEIR KNOW-HOW. NOW, THAT MAY BE BASED ON THEORIES OR ON BIASED OPINIONS CLASSED AS “FACTS” OR INCORRECTLY EVALUATED OR THE STUDY HAS FALSE OR INCORRECT DATA IN IT OR IT IS FALSIFIED.

    WE ERR TO BLAME INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS LAST IN THE CHAIN OR IN BETWEEN IT INSTEAD OF THOSE AT THE START OF THE EVENT CHAIN, I.E. PRIMARY CAUSER. AND THE RECEIVER FAILS TO SEE OR HANDLE THE PROBLEM WITH THAT SPECIFIC STUDY OR REPORT ANALYSIS.

    EXECUTIVES AND LEADERS WORK HARD AND ON THE WHOLE ATTEMPT TO DO RIGHT. BUT THEY HAVE TO RELY ON OTHERS TO OBSERVE, EVALUATE AND WEIGH MOST OF THE INFORMATION IN THEIR ARENA. THEIR DECISIONS ARE GOOD AS THEIR INFORMATION.

WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY'S VIEWS AND EXAMPLES?

Refs.

WILL DURRANT book on PHILOSOPHY, FOR CAUSE AND EFFECT.

CHARLES MACKAY, EXTRODINARY POPULAR DELUSIONS AND THE MADNESS OF CROWDS.

Quotes from FRANCIS BACON

“Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe and take for granted ...but to weigh and consider”.

“The general root of superstition : namely, that men observe when things hit, and not when they miss; and commit to memory the one, and forget and pass over the other”.

“The remedy is worse than the disease”.

“Money is like manure, its only good if you spread it around”.