Jump to content

Digital pound could hit financial stability and erode privacy, UK lawmakers warn


Recommended Posts

Digital pound could hit financial stability and erode privacy, UK lawmakers warn

Reuters.pngForexJan 13, 2022 
 
 
 
Digital pound could hit financial stability and erode privacy, UK lawmakers warn© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Representations of the Ripple, Bitcoin, Etherum and Litecoin virtual currencies are seen on a PC motherboard in this illustration picture, February 14, 2018. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

By Tom Wilson

LONDON (Reuters) - A digital pound used by consumers could harm financial stability, raise the cost of credit and erode privacy, though a version for wholesale use in the financial sector demands greater appraisal, British lawmakers said on Thursday.

Britain's central bank and finance ministry said in November they would hold a consultation this year on whether to move forward on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that would be introduced after 2025 at the earliest.

Central banks across the world have stepped up work on CBDCs to avoid the private sector dominating digital payments as cash use falls. The prospect of widely-used cryptocurrencies issued by Big Tech has also galvanized such efforts.

But an e-pound used by households and business for everyday payments could see people move cash from commercial bank accounts to digital wallets, said the report by a committee in the House of Lords, parliament's unelected upper chamber.

That could spark financial instability in times of economic stress and increase borrowing costs as a key source of lenders' funding would dry up, it said.

A digital pound could also harm privacy, the report added, by allowing the Bank of England to monitor spending.

"We were really concerned by a number of the risks that are posed by the introduction of a CBDC," Economic Affairs Committee Chair Michael Forsyth told Reuters.

ROLE OF PARLIAMENT

The potential benefits of a CBDC - from tackling the decline to cash to supporting payments innovation - laid out by the Bank of England in 2020 were "overstated" or could be "achieved by alternative means with fewer risks," Forsyth said.

He said, for instance, that regulation was a better tool to ward off the threat of cryptocurrencies issued by Big Tech firms.

The Bank of England did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Still, a wholesale CBDC used to transfer large sums could make securities trading and settlement more efficient, the report said. Britain's central bank and finance ministry should consult on its advantages over the expansion of the existing settlements system, the report said.

Britain's parliament should have the final say on any decision to launch a e-pound, it said, calling for lawmakers to also vote on how such a currency would be governed.

Forsyth said financial services minister John Glen had failed to give assurances that a CBDC "was not just something that the Bank of England and the Treasury would cook up and decide on the governance."

 

A CBDC would have "far-reaching consequences for households, business and the monetary system," Forsyth said. "That needs to be approved by parliament."

Responding to a request for comment on Forsyth's comments, a spokesperson for the Treasury, which runs Britain's financial and economic policy, said no decision had been made on whether to introduce a CBDC.

 

What are your thoughts and views on this ?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • What’s the average spread like, generally? How does it compare to current conditions? I’ve been using IG for over a decade, and I’ve noticed a growing sense of dissatisfaction, not just from myself but across various forums too. I think they really need to prioritize some core areas—like improving the iOS app and refining the API. While your issue may not be directly tied to the API, in theory, if you know how to use it well, it should offer a better experience compared to the web platform or the standard retail charts. Just my two cents. As for the problem, it’s definitely not about liquidity in these markets. I’d say it’s more likely due to the rise of algorithmic trading over the years. These high-speed algorithms can take advantage of price movements, often leading to short periods of slippage for regular traders as prices shift rapidly. Market orders, meant to execute quickly at the best available price, are more prone to slippage compared to limit orders. Since market orders prioritize speed, they don’t guarantee a specific price. If the market price changes in the short moment between when you place the order and when it's actually executed, your trade will go through at the new price, whether it’s better or worse than expected. This makes market orders riskier in fast-moving or volatile markets. By using the API along with a low-latency server, you can reduce the risk of slippage in some cases. What kind of latency are you experiencing with the API? Avoid using a home connection for this—opt for an affordable VPS, even a $5 one will significantly improve your experience.
    • Cardano’s 3.8% price surge might be from all the updates and partnerships they’ve been rolling out lately. I’ve noticed that every time they release some big news, like a new upgrade or collaboration, there’s always a jump in price. The community around Cardano is really strong too, which seems to play a role in driving things. A few weeks back, I swapped some tokens using https://stealthex.io , and I remember seeing a bunch of people talking about Cardano on forums. Maybe that hype is finally showing in the price. Either way, it’s nice to see some action in the market again.
    • Hi everyone, just a short post at this stage as I want to see if there is any interest in this topic first.  I’ll likely contact IG but wanted to see if there are other thoughts and experiences first as there are several issues I am seeing and it’s a bit complicated, so didn’t want to write some long rambling post. i trade the Dax and Nasdaq indices and use an automated strategy using the API.  I am effectively trying to do a trend trading strategy but on short timescales.  So i set fairly tight stops and then run those trades that leave the area to the plus side.  My win rate is low so have a lot of losers so slippage on stops is quite important to me. i have a database of trades and 5m data going back over 3years now - so have a lot of data to work with. i measured the stop slippage several years ago and it was fine for this method but have re measured it recently as I noticed the losing trades were a bit too large and it seems that the slippage has increased quite a lot for Nasdaq (not then Dax). I am trying to see what is behind this. Anyone interested or tackling similar issues? Thanks David 
×
×
  • Create New...
us