-
Posts
-
By cryptomaga · Posted
Staking is the cornerstone for Network security in proof of stake (pos) and 32 ETH requirement for becoming a validator remain a stumbling block to many potential participants in Eth transition to pos. This was why one analyst recently praised Puffer Finance and claim it could increase participation since users can participate in Ethereum staking with as little as 1 or 2 ETH, especially with the anti-Slashing Technology. I didn’t pay much attention to his analysis since I didn’t have 1 eth to stake during the testnet stage but will this have any impact on eth staking participation? -
By parvashasan · Posted
What caught my eye is their focus on empowering creators in the crypto world. As someone who's always been interested in the creator economy, I'm really curious to see how their MUA7648 protocol works. Apparently, it helps with the "modularization of AI agent assets" and supports unlimited issuance. Not entirely sure what that means in practice, but it sounds promising! Oh, and get this - they're running a trading event with a 500,000 MUA prize pool! 🎁 If you're interested, you need to register first. Trading starts on October 10th at 07:00 UTC. I've been reading up on their ecosystem, and it's pretty comprehensive. They've got MUA Academy for learning, MUA Cantina as a marketplace, MUA Labs for innovation, and something called MUAverse. With over 5,000 certified creators already on board, it seems like they're building a solid community. -
With the uncertain nature of the market and insignificant airdrop rewards, exploring other strategies is a no brainer. While assessing liquid staking as a valid option, Puffer Finance reward easily appeals for its rewards and flexibility. With Puffer, anyone can benefit from both PoS and restaking earnings. Users can also stake ETH and receive liquid restaking token pufETH which appreciates as validators are added. In addition to its Liquid restaking rewards, PUFFER token's listing on Bitget is imminent providing various earning opportunities including a launchpool, PoolX etc. Puffer Finance has seen an exponential adoption since launch, could this listing and the opportunities it will unlock fast track its adoption?
-
Question
Marcipops
I am using Lightstreamer to stream tick data: https://labs.ig.com/streaming-api-reference
There is an issue when receiving ticks through midnight as you can see from this data extract below.
For each tick, I am recording the date of each tick from my local clock, so I can know the exact date time of the tick.
The data marked in amber is being labelled by my program as belonging to the same date as the data in black, when it should be labelling it belonging to the next day. From this, it seems that like my local clock is a couple of seconds behind the ig clock.
For example tick data received with UPDATE_TIME = 00:00 is for the next day, but is being recorded as the same day by my program using current date from local clock.
I was therefore looking on labs.ig.com for a way of obtaining the date of the tick message, so I could record the ig date of the tick against its time. But that approach would have a problem if the date changes after fetching the date and before collecting the tick.
Presume the opposite is also true, someone's local computer clock might be ahead of ig. Therefore with the extract above, incorrectly labelling the tick received at UPDATE_TIME = 23:59:40 with the date of the next day.
This could be completely resolved of course if the tick data had date as well as time.
Is there a workaround?
Many thanks
Link to comment
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now