Jump to content

Big Fed Hike and S&P 500 Rallies, Will It Persist After Another Through GDP’s Recession Risks?


Recommended Posts

As John Kicklightrer pointed out:

10-Yr yield reflects the economic outlook, as a growth measure tool.

The 2-Yr yield reflects the Interest rates moves.

WHEN THE SPREAD INVERTS A RECESSION CAN BE MORE LIKELY.

SO, HOW DID WE GET TO HIGHER INFLATION?

Most economists and financiers forget that IT IS THE MONEY SUPPLY THAT GOVERNS FUTURE INFLATION LEVELS. The FED knows this yet it does the opposite to its control, by having QE for a very long time. Maybe they think they are the gods of the economy..... yet they cannot foretell the effects of QE beforehand or they are trying out a desperate measure to create growth by more and more flooding the market with excess fiat money, WAY BEYOND THE GOODS AND SERVICES DELIVERED.

IT IS BACKWARD THINKING TO THINK GREATER GROWTH WILL OCCUR AND MAGICALLY MAKE THE ECONOMY DO WELL.  YOU CAN LIKEN IT TO GIVING A JUNKY **** MORE AND MORE, TO KEEP HIM HIGH IN AN ILLUSION, THUS KILLING HIM EVENTUALLY. OR, YOU STOP IT AND HE SUFFERS FROM THE WITHDRAWAL EFFECTS WHICH NO ONE SEEMS TO WANT TO CONFRONT AND DO, TO GET HIM OUT OF THAT ADDICTION.

EITHER WAY, IT WAS THE INCORRECT ACTION, OF FEEDING THAT **** IN THE FIRST PLACE. FOR US, THAT MEANS THE OVER-SUPPLY OF THE MONEY. THIS HAS INFLATED MOST THINGS TO EXTREME LEVELS, E.G., STOCKS, COMMODITIES, HOUSE PRICES, ETC.. MOST OF THIS MONEY WAS NOT USED FOR INVESTING BACK INTO DEVELOPING NEW GOODS, NEW DEVELOPMENTS OR BETTER CASH FLOWS AND CASH LEVELS WITH COMPANIES.

MARKETS BOOMING DO NOT REFLECT CORRECTLY A RISING ECONOMY. WE HAD AN ECONOMY GDP THAT HAS AVERAGED LESS  IN THIS BULL MARKET (WHICH HAD REACRED HIGHEST EVER VALUATONS) THAN IN PREVIOUS BULL PHASES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH CYCLES.

EXCESS MONEY HAS GONE INTO THE STOCKS, SHARE BUYBACKS, AND ULTRA LOW RATES HAVE ENCOURAGED HUGE DEBT BUILD-UP WITH COMPANIES, GOVERNMENTS, HIGHEST-EVER MARGIN-DEBTS, EXCESSIVE BETS IN THE MARKETS, WORSE ILLIQUIDITY-BUILD-UP WITH BANKS. WHY, THE FED WAS HAPPY TO CREATE ALL THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR, AFTER YEAR.

LATER ON THE FED IS LIKELY TO SAY: 'Oh, we did not know this would happen', OR, 'this was an experiment', OR,  'this was too complex to see the outcome' OR, 'All central banks have done the same so we all are suffering the same -- not our fault, mate' (i.e., don't take responsibility and resign, and not change any theories we use) etc...

IF ANY SUCH EXCUSES APPEARS ( as similar ones have in past phases ), THEN WHY ARE THEY IN BUSINESS?

THEY CANNOT CONTROL THE ECONMY WELL, AS ALL BOOMS AND BURSTS HAVE SHOWN; AND HUGE LOSS OF PURCHASING POWER HAS SHOWN; AND AS THE TRILLIONS LOST ON EACH CYCLE BY BUSINESSES; AND EVEN THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAVE LOSSES HAVE SHOWN. RESULTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, NOT TALK.

WHEN WILL PEOPLE, COMPANIES AND BANKERS WAKE UP FROM THEIR ILLUSIONS OF BEING EXPERTS WHO "KNOW", YET CANNOT HANDLE OR CONTROL IT?

IN ECOMONICS THEY ARE FINE LAWS WE DO KNOW BUT THEY ARE ABUSIVELY USED. ALSO THERE ARE CHANGING VARIABLES AND EVENTS THAT JUST CANNOT BE PREDICTED IN ANY MODELS. CURRENT FUTURE IS NOT GOOD.

TIME FOR A CHANGE? ARE YOU READY TO CHANGE YOUR PRACTICES AND THEORIES?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • The mischievous amphibian who became a meme legend? Well, meet Apu, his wide-eyed, optimistic cousin, taking the internet by storm – and now, perhaps, the world of finance. Apu, also known as Peepo or Helper, is a kinder, gentler Pepe variant. Tired of the often-scammy memecoin scene, Apu (or rather, Apu's devoted community) decided to create something different: $APU, a "fairly launched, fully transparent coin" built by and for "all frens." Here's where things get interesting. $APU's narrative is one of resilience and community power. Fueled by the cryptocurrency community's enthusiasm, $APU was initially launched with the best of intentions. However, the dream took a nasty turn when the original developer pulled the rug – a disheartening scenario for many crypto enthusiasts. Today, $APU stands as a testament to community empowerment. It's a beacon of hope for projects facing similar challenges, a reminder that collaboration and resilience can transform setbacks into stepping stones. It's also worth noting that another community-driven memecoin, $MASSA, recently found a home on the Bitget exchange. Could this be a sign of things to come for $APU? What are your thoughts? Does Apu's story inspire you? Can a memecoin truly become a legitimate force in the volatile world of cryptocurrency? Share your thoughts and predictions in the comments below!
    • The price shown on the graph is the price after the IG's fee taken. That is the reason for discrepancy.
    • I am a relatively newbie. I have seen similar and also have seen automated closed position has a loss though the close price I have set was above the price I have bought. After about 6 months with a lot of mysterious losses though my closing price was above the opening price, I discovered this was because of the amount charged for opening/closing a position. This is right below BUY and SELL boxes on the right in very small font. This amount vary from  0.9 to 33 or more depending on the level of trading at the time you open or close. It also happens (god knows why it is set to be so, except that the trader is not watching) when there is a lot of buying and selling going on, like an important news has suddenly been out and the result was not the market expected. As a result, I delete all my automated BUY/SELL values before I stop trading for the day. Remember, the the software is set up to favor the IG, not the retail seller. That is why 70% or more end up in loss.  
×
×
  • Create New...
us