Jump to content
  • 0

PRT charts not being corrected


ST

Question

For the past two months or thereabouts I have been reporting flawed charts using the email facility in the ProRealtime software. Only one of the many charts that I have reported has been corrected. Listed below is just a fraction of the charts I have reported. You will see that some have been reported twice but to no avail!

 

UK Stocks 

 

3rd April: CHG

25th May: WTAN, FEV, BTEM, MRO, TEM

27th May: RSW 

13th June: RSW

14th June: JLT, FEV

22nd June: CRDA

 

US Stocks

 

8th May: CBOE

9th May: MRCY

15th May: ZION

20th May: CTSH

30th May: CBOE

 

12th June: AXP

13th June: CAT

14th June: VVC, CME, CMA, LECO, NJR, NWE, MMM

20th June: PG

23rd June: CBPO

 

This is the bunch of US stocks I reported yesterday i.e. 24th June: ARMK, ARW, BLL, FNF, FBHS, PAC, HAS, IPGP, MCD, MHK, NEE, PKG, SSNC, STE, TRU, WCG, YUM

 

My focus is on the US and UK markets, I estimate the percentage of stocks with charts with flawed data is at least in double digits. Far beyond the "one or two that escape the net" as has been previously postulated or as you have articulated " Due to the large number of instruments we offer we sometimes do miss some errors on charts." I understand that the same flawed data powers the new IG charts too! On that basis, I find it incredulous, almost bizarre, even surreal that so much work is going into developing the new charts when IG does not have a reliable data feed!! It seems very much like the cart is being put before the horse. In the context of any developments to the charts where indicators are a derivative of price (are there any that are not?) the old IT adage is very appropriate, "garbage in, garbage out" 

 

Before I finished this post I thought I would go through the Dow Jones Industrial Index or Wall Street in IG speak to see how many defected charts would be revealed. The following is the result of that exercise:

 

MMM, CAT, TNH, GE, GS, HD, JPM, JNJ, MRK, NKE, TRV, UTX, UNH, VZ, MCD & PG.

 

More than half, i.e. 16 charts out of 30

 

 

Link to comment

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The DFB chart of Mitie(MTO.LSE) is showing a long wick to the downside today on the one minute candle. The candle low is showing a misleading 272.5, whereas on the LSE's chart the candle is much different in form and is showing a low of 287.1

 

http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/summary/company-summary-chart.html?fourWayKey=GB0004657408GBGBXSTMM

 

The spread on the current DFB is just under two points. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      16,577
    • Total Posts
      79,189
    • Total Members
      65,044
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    frumudana
    Joined 28/11/21 10:53
  • Posts

    • The new variant seems to have a higher rate of transmission and a lower infection fatality rate than delta, this is the normal progression for a virus (spreads more easily but causes less harm). It has clearly been in circulation for some time but only now been sequenced. Already found in the UK, Europe and Australia. Even highly mutable viruses like flu should only come up with new dominant strains every couple of years or so but with covid it’s more like 6 months. This is a strong indication of vaccine ADE where the viral evolutionary process speeds up in response to a mass vaccination programme and is why the vaccinations should have been targeted to the vulnerable only. Reminder that the covid infection fatality rate is similar to flu, yes people do die of flu but we never locked down, switched off the health service and forced an experimental drug on everyone. Sweden did none of these things and had no more deaths in 2020 than normal. Vaccine ADE also causes the suppression and derangment of the natural immune system so in time people will become dependant on vaccine boosters and upgrades. At some point the high rate of mutations will throw up a variant that is more deadly not less. All previous trials for mRNA vaccines were halted due to vaccine ADE. They knew this might happen. The misleading info govt continues to put out is being highlighted more and more hence the panic over ‘conspiracy theories’ and anti-vaxxers. Be very sceptical of the official narrative and question the road the govt is leading you down because currently you are watching the destruction of western democracy and the Chinafication of the western world – yes really. Govts admit that the vaccines don’t prevent covid transmission. So why do govts insist on vax passports? There’s absolutely no justifiable, rational reason. The vax passports are part of a bigger picture than just covid. Most are obliged to get vaccinated just to stay in a job but start the critical thinking process anyway, it’s not too late.   But but but ... How did we ever manage to eradicate smallpox then ?????   1. A sterilizing vaccine 2. No animal reservoirs 3. Focused quarantine for positive cases 4. A public health establishment worthy of trust 5. International cooperation 6. Centuries of work Zero covid is a dangerous utopian fantasy. (Jay Bhattacharya @DrJBhattacharya) Eradication of Covid Is a Dangerous and Expensive Fantasy - WSJ
    • haha, Patrick Vallance - ‘the reason this one is worrying is the combination of transmissibility and the potential for some degree of escape from vaccines because of the changes.’ They haven’t even tested it against the vaccine but they know in advance the vaccines wouldn't work. Some degree of escape haha, total you mean, as said, only cooking the books allowed Delta to look like the vaccines still worked - a bit. Don't comply, stop swallowing this never ending stream of utter garbage.        
    • haha, did you get your text from the NHS today?     ''Just got this text from NHS. Interestingly, since “fully vaccinated” now means: “at least 14 days since 3rd jab” or “between at least 14 days & < 6 months of 2nd jab” the 8 out of 10 is probably about right. But totally misleading. Less than 1 out of 10 have had no vacc.''   Prof Norman Fenton @profnfenton  37m   🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 ''If I happened to miss the first 3 jabs and go straight to the 4th, am I good? Or do I need the first 3 that don't work...to be combined together, in order to make the 4th one work? This science stuff is confusing!''     Rule Boy @RuleBoy11
×
×
  • Create New...