Jump to content

Code and name are wrong on IG and PRT for Standard Life Aberdeen PLC on DFB


Recommended Posts

The code and name for Standard Life Aberdeen PLC are both wrong on the IG platform and PRT on DFB.

 

The name is showing as Standard Life PLC and the code SL.

 

The correct data is Standard Life Aberdeen PLC with code SLA as the company merged last week.

 

Please fix asap hopefully within 24 hours....especially PRT which often seems slow to have errors fixed.

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post

Hi  - some areas on the IG offering (such as PRT and the new web trading platform) will take up to 24 hours to pull through the display data on a daily sweep. Please rest assured that this change has been made and is purely a display aspect on the asset name. For this reason it wouldn't effect the functionality, back end system, pricing or dealing aspect for any accounts. 

 

Thanks

James

Link to post

24 hours later and PRT is still wrong.

 

A similar error existed on PRT a couple of weeks ago.  It took 6 phone calls and 2 weeks for the error to be fixed.

 

Hopefully this one will be fixed much sooner.

 

Thank you for your assistance.

Link to post

Hi  Apologies about the kerfuffle on this. We made the appropriate changed on our side when you first brought this to our attention, however it seems like this hasn't pulled through to the full PRT offering. This hasn't been an issue on a couple of other stocks we've changed recently, so we are just trying to isolate why this has happened here. 

 

We have raised a ticket with IT Finance, the company who own Pro Real Time, and I shall get back to you as soon as I have an answer. 

Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,705
    • Total Posts
      68,390
    • Total Members
      57,298
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 11:51

    Newest Member
    Joanna
    Joined 21/01/21 19:16
  • Posts

    • and so suddenly, within the last few days; - Vit D finally gets govt recommended. - Invermectin finally gets approval. - HCQ now suggested as a treatment instead of being banned. - WHO finally revises PCR test to reduce huge ratio of false positives.   With all these much cheaper treatments now available it's lucky for big Pharma then that all their vaccines have already been bought up for the next few years. 🙄   .  
    • Interesting snip from Parliament TV.  NHS staff are now full on the Lateral Flow Test twice a week but still waiting for public LFT mass testing roll out. Asymptomatics testing -ve on LFT will not need a PCR and therefore an end to the PCR false positive pandemic. Govt claim to have several hundred million LFT kits, not sure why the holdup. First 15 min discusses LFT efficacy. https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/c435f728-b042-4293-a877-42812aa90dee
    • Thanks for the post.  I would be interested in understand the costs associated with the relevant ETF. Do they carry the same sort of fees as one would expect from investing in the fund directly (management, performance, early exit etc.) or are they limited to the usual dealing costs - commission, SDRT? Also, for my clarity, we are talking about fund which may be issued by large investment managers (e.g. Blackrock - iShares, Baillie Gifford, PIMCO etc.) which are traded on the LSE
×
×
  • Create New...