Jump to content
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
ChrisMahoola

Professional qualifications & margins

Question

Hi, I've seen a warning pop up about the proposed new margin requirements.  One of the conditions is that you've received some professional training.  My question is, what would be the minimum required for this and how much would the course be especially for self training.  I could think of it as an interesting opportunity!

 

Thanks, Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Well there's not many outside the EU that provide CFD and spreadbetting I'm afraid, it's banned in the USA (not sure about Canada) and you'll have a pretty hard time finding a replacement company (I looked before)

 

@ChrisMahoola With a grand, yes it'll be pretty much useless, I mean personally I wouldn't go through all the stress and time of trading, scouring through charts and economic data/news for the sake of 50p a point....so the ESMA move will no doubt get rid of the "newbie novices" who are just about making ends meet with a normal day job..

 

All in all - it's not good for the average poorer punter (who probably does £5pp on a small pot), IMO they've just turned it into a rich mans club :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I'd far rather accept the regs and keep my money in a regulated and reputable UK listed business than some shady foreign outfit, but each to their own. 

 

Storm. Teacup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Fantastic firms elsewhere i,e Australasia - retail investors well looked after.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

UK is the only place to trade taxfree spreadbetting?

 

But others that trade CFDs can probably find something outside EU like Switzerland? or Austrailia?

 

Maybe IG can help those that want to move from "ESMA" to another country and still use IG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

There could well be other knock on effects. It seems likely ESMA will chase not only those just starting out with a small account straight into the laps of the unregulated offshore firms but also many with experience who are trying to build up their account, the decision looks short sighted and damaging to small retail and brokers alike.

 

Obviously brokers are now going to concentrate on their higher end clients, not only to make sure they keep those they already have but to try to poach from other firms and I wonder how that might impact the small retail trader. The negative account protection will increase costs but will apply only to retail not 'professionals'.

 

So small retail will be generating less revenue and higher costs at a time when IG need a plan to lure high end 'professionals'. I wonder what/who will be sacrificed?

For instance will they be lowering the SB minimum bet size, come July the current minimum in many markets will be higher than a maximum bet size on a small account. Or just introduce a new higher account minimum.

 

This ESMA decision will generate more change yet as it must cause a rethink of IG's business model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

But if no retail taking the other side of the pro

 

IG need to hedge more in the real markets and thats more expensive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

these new measure are very unfortunate for traders as they limit opportunities 

 

these new measure are very unfortunate for IG as they will make less profit

 

unfortunately these measure came around due to the nature of the business that IG and other ran 

 

effectively a ponzi scheme where they do everything to churn and burn customers and get new ones to keep they business going 

 

we are now even getting ads on tv with a company promoting that they put all orders into the market ! implying they know that other companies try to get customers to lose .. 

 

ig asking for help from customers .. is like a fox asking the chickens to tell the farmer the fox is ok .. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Anyone know of spreadbetting providers from Canada or Australia (where it is legal)?

 

I ultimately will need to make a decision between regulation and safety of deposits over maximising the return from my strategy.

 

Quickly searched for non EU domiciled spreadbetting companies but I'm struggling to find one. Seems like it could be a gold mine for someone to set up a non EU domiciled spreadbetting company that is regulated and run in a non pirate way!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

James, the FCA handbook rule say point 1 and 3 required... But IG are only using Point 2 for ascertaining qualification.. How come?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


 wrote:

James, the FCA handbook rule say point 1 and 3 required... But IG are only using Point 2 for ascertaining qualification.. How come?

Hey  - we comply with all points, however they are done at different times so it may not be as obvious. For example part 1 is completed on sign up, and if insufficient understanding of the financial markets comes across then we will perform additional appropriateness. Part 2 will be checked when a client specifically wants to upgrade, as is part 3. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

There are a few points that in my opinion illustrate that all these decisions are done by people that have not used a CFD/Spreadbetting account themselves.

1st

500k to determine if someone is professional is a great measure, clearly someone with 450k has no clue about what he/she is doing

 

2nd

Now an account cannot lose more than deposited.
If those that wanted to not have any risk of losing more than deposited, they could have used garanteed stops.

For the extreme risk taker that amounts to:
Now your account is protected from losing more that you deposited, but you now are forced to lose 10x the amount than you ever wanted to risk, due to the fact that you now need 12k margin, where before you needed 1.2k. In case of a flashcrash worst case szenario you now lose the 12k not only the 1.2k.

 

There are a lot of CFD companies out there that are small and in countries like Cyprus where legislation and supervision is not the standart it might be in th UK or Germany.
Those companies force customers (which want to keep the same trading style and can afford it) do deposit huge amounts of money to their accounts.
I hope that the ESMA makes sure that all those funds are protected if/when one of those companies goes belly up.

 

Apart from that a 1200 Euro deposit turning into a 12000 Euro deposit due to increased margin might not be a problem by the amount of money itself, I would have prefered to keep the additional 10800 Euro in a long term stock market ETF earning money than at a CFD account where the only thing it does is giving a unpaid loan to the CFD broker.

How that is protecting me as a customer, I have still not figured out.

 

With the requested margin I guess a move to the futures markets directly makes more sense.
But maybe IG figures something out.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

It says 500k in stocks cash etc. What if the original 500k you have invested is currently below that due to open trades which are in a loss?

Would this classify as having 500k or does the overall balance with open trades need to be 500k or above?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Retail customers leaving IG in huge numbers...no surprise there !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Guest majco
On 1/22/2018 at 12:12 PM, db said:

Hi , as regards point number 1 in the screenshot posted above, with reference to having traded 10 times in each of the previous 4 quarters, what is the definition of 'significant size' in this case?

 

Thanks

You have to have traded 10 times with a minimum lot size of 0.50 lots per trade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      4,946
    • Total Posts
      19,402
  • Getting Started

    Please make sure that you have had a quick look at our Community Guidelines before you start posting.

    You can also check out the following tutorials to get up and running as quickly as possible. 

    1. How do I start a new topic?
    2. How do I ask a question?
    3. How do I search Community?
    4. How do I access via mobile?
    5. What does 'following' content mean?
  • Handpicked content from IG Community

    • Comcast / Disney bidding war ends - EMEA brief 20th July
      The Comcast / Disney bidding war for 21st Century Fox ended yesterday with the former pulling out of the race. Comcast have stated they are still planning on pursuing Sky. Asian equity markets pushed higher overnight over a volatile trading session as the Chinese yuan bounced off a one year low. Trump showed displeasure towards the Fed's hikes, criticising policy and highlighting concerns on the potential impact of rising interest rates on the US economy causing the Dollar to sag.

      The losses seen in some of the Asian markets are expected to continue in Europe, with small drops for indices expected. Canadian CPI is the sole macro point of interest, while on the earnings front General Electric and Schlumberger report figures. The US dollar will also be in focus after President Trump commented that further rate increases could derail the economic boom in the US.
      • 0 replies
    • Market Screening for Dividend Opportunities
      This article will also look at IGs market screening tool and attempt to come up with some ideas the stocks that could be bought on the basis of the dividend they offer. It seems a good time to at least begin starting to look at stocks that pay a good dividends (begin creating a Watchlist maybe?)  but crucially stocks that also seem capable of continuing to pay that dividend.

      The reason for this article is the markets have been a bit turbulent lately: there are various geopolitical events on the horizon (which could trigger panic in the market) but also because with stocks trading near all-time highs it may be more prudent to look for stocks that pay in income (dividend) rather than stocks for future the growth potential. And lastly the previous stock market crash was 10 years ago. That in itself is not a sign of doom, but history repeats, eventually. 😉
        • Great!
        • Like
      • 5 replies
×