Jump to content

Indices


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, HMB said:

yes, phrased like that it more accurately captures the narrative - however should one not still have questioned that immediately?  because - what would have been a realistic expectation of what the Fed could have done, Powell could have said yesterday?  Rates at zero, they are already buying high yield bonds etc., just had confirmed the move to AIT in virtual Jackson Hole.  What could they have added at this stage?  And hence, which expectations exactly were so strongly disappointed to justify a roughly 66 points lower SPX overnight low?  After already around 27 points drop between pc and cash close?

...were expectations maybe for more buying on the longer end..?

think that this likely wasn't the only major factor.  maybe also still pressure from outstanding calls approaching expiry, for example  (that wouldn't explain a rebound today really, though..) 

 

I'm trying to become more careful with the common narratives flowing around. 

 

Dude ...

WTF are you on?

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Tom?

How many years and you've never shown any trades?

don't need to show every trade because I've said dozens of times how I trade which is obviously a lot more helpful.

So for the hard of thinking I'll repeat again that I post the important levels because price moves between levels of supply and demand. The levels posted in advance were in the past important so may turn out again to be levels of dispute between buyers and sellers.

Between these levels are areas of range expansion, this is were I look for pullbacks on the lower time frame charts for entries to ride price onto the next level target.

However knowing what to do is not enough for some, they actually just want someone to continually give them the answers, they probably picked up this appalling habit in some cr@p socialist inspired education system.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

don't need to show every trade because I've said dozens of times how I trade which is obviously a lot more helpful.

So for the hard of thinking I'll repeat again that I post the important levels because price moves between levels of supply and demand. The levels posted in advance were in the past important so may turn out again to be levels of dispute between buyers and sellers.

Between these levels are areas of range expansion, this is were I look for pullbacks on the lower time frame charts for entries to ride price onto the next level target.

However knowing what to do is not enough for some, they actually just want someone to continually give them the answers, they probably picked up this appalling habit in some cr@p socialist inspired education system.

guess this worked nicely for NDX recently..?  if you assumed at the Wednesday overnight low last week that the range is established, you had two full round-trips - four times 650 points or so..? 1197740991_USTech100Cash(1)_20200917_12_39.thumb.png.0d28a1a9744a15377a26a3d1d198e478.png

Edited by HMB
  • Like 2
Link to comment

A post about trade management. I did not follow my playbook with respect to the hourly charts and at this point on the charts I was sucking the air between my teeth sitting on a loss short the Nikkei. But the longer time frame aspect of the trade idea was not invalidated. The resistance at around 23400 had not been breached and the Dow was still below the 50 Day MA. I was prepared to start scaling out at a loss if that resistance was breached but a series of lower highs emerged on the hourly charts. As Mr Dante says try to open a trade as close to the point where you know your wrong as you can, which I failed to do.

1941742853_IGMetaTrader4Terminal.thumb.png.09ec75fa32153725f9438ac1b9710b3d.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, AndrewS said:

A post about trade management. I did not follow my playbook with respect to the hourly charts and at this point on the charts I was sucking the air between my teeth sitting on a loss short the Nikkei. But the longer time frame aspect of the trade idea was not invalidated. The resistance at around 23400 had not been breached and the Dow was still below the 50 Day MA. I was prepared to start scaling out at a loss if that resistance was breached but a series of lower highs emerged on the hourly charts. As Mr Dante says try to open a trade as close to the point where you know your wrong as you can, which I failed to do.

1941742853_IGMetaTrader4Terminal.thumb.png.09ec75fa32153725f9438ac1b9710b3d.png

sorry for being block-headed, are you saying that it was wrong to short too far away from the resistance, because closing at the point were you would have considered your trade idea as invalidated would have come with a too large loss?  sounds like good advice..

why had you opened the trade anyway?

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, HMB said:

sorry for being block-headed, are you saying that it was wrong to short too far away from the resistance, because closing at the point were you would have considered your trade idea as invalidated would have come with a too large loss?  sounds like good advice..

why had you opened the trade anyway?

 

Well although it is one scaled into trade, for me it is two trades. A bad entry not following the playbook where the risk/return (distance) and probability would have been better and a good trade where I held onto it when the prospects (distance) were better.

So on a hourly time frame opening the trade was a mistake, but the trade management at a key level was better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
10 hours ago, AndrewS said:

Well although it is one scaled into trade, for me it is two trades. A bad entry not following the playbook where the risk/return (distance) and probability would have been better and a good trade where I held onto it when the prospects (distance) were better.

So on a hourly time frame opening the trade was a mistake, but the trade management at a key level was better.

thanks, understood - was just wondering what made you enter it in spite of against your playbook - there must have been a valid reason, as in the end it worked out well

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, HMB said:

thanks, understood - was just wondering what made you enter it in spite of against your playbook - there must have been a valid reason, as in the end it worked out well

Just the general weakness in the US and European Indices and the view that they were unlikely to rise much further in the short term. But I did not have a specific set-up for the Nikkei which was showing strength at the time. I was also trying to trial trading longer time frames which I am not very good at. It is 1.45 AM Sydney time and it would be nice to change the hours I trade, but I doubt that I can.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, AndrewS said:

Just the general weakness in the US and European Indices and the view that they were unlikely to rise much further in the short term. But I did not have a specific set-up for the Nikkei which was showing strength at the time. I was also trying to trial trading longer time frames which I am not very good at. It is 1.45 AM Sydney time and it would be nice to change the hours I trade, but I doubt that I can.

 

ok, makes sense, thanks.  good night...

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Certain centralised platforms have been very intentional about creating wealth for its users to this end CEXs like Bitget have built certain frameworks to aid this adequately.  Through the instrument of its launch pool, it lets users earn massive APR thus providing a good ground for wealth creation. The performance of some of the launchpool projects lends credence to this, the likes of $ENA, $ZKF $GRAPE and a host of others generated good APRs.  In an almost similar exactitude as the launchpool, the PoolX is the new framework that lets users earn by staking $BGB and $USDT to mine other tokens on the platform. From the products Bitget have brought forth it is safe to say the platform is playing a worthwhile part in wealth creation to every crypto enthusiast around the globe.  Personally, I have participated in these and i will say they are worthwhile opportunities to make fortunes off of, i will advise you jump on it too anon.
    • Certain centralised platforms have been very intentional about creating wealth for its users to this end CEXs like Bitget have built certain frameworks to aid this adequately.  Through the instrument of its launch pool, it lets users earn massive APR thus providing a good ground for wealth creation. The performance of some of the launchpool projects lends credence to this, the likes of $ENA, $ZKF $GRAPE and a host of others generated good APRs.  In an almost similar exactitude as the launchpool, the PoolX is the new framework that lets users earn by staking $BGB and $USDT to mine other tokens on the platform. From the products Bitget have brought forth it is safe to say the platform is playing a worthwhile part in wealth creation to every crypto enthusiast around the globe.  Personally, I have participated in these and i will say they are worthwhile opportunities to make fortunes off of, i will advise you jump on it too anon.
    • For example, look at today's 15/04/24,  DAX (Germany) 40 chart action. I predicted that the market would take off up from the very start and have a positive morning.
×
×
  • Create New...
us