Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Is your Cash ISA a wasted opportunity?

Recommended Posts

The number of people with Cash ISAs has fallen by 3.8 million since the 2008 financial crisis as more and more people start to realise that keeping their savings in cash gives them a negative real return. This is because the rate of inflation has mostly been above the interest rate paid on Cash ISA accounts during the last decade.

 

It is worth pointing out that if you plan to use cash for intended purchases, or require a buffer for those unfortunate and unexpected outlays, it is likely that holding cash or investing in a very low volatility fund is the sensible thing to do.

 

However If you have a longer term investment horizon (+3 years), the majority of people should look to invest in a diversified portfolio containing a mix of equities, fixed income and alternative investments such as gold.

 

As you can see from the chart below, even if you had been very unlucky and invested just before the 2008 financial crisis; an investment of £20,000 in a balanced portfolio would now be worth around £37,000 today. If you had opted for a Cash ISA, your savings would have grown to just £25,000.

 

2018-03-09 09_24_47-Community articles ISA season 1 - 3.docx - Word.png

 

If you have any good stats to support this claim or if you disagree please post these below.

Share this post


Link to post

that is interesting, how is the 'balanced portfolio' defined, in this chart? also it is worth just honing in that the balanced portfolio dropped by about £5,000 between 2008 - 2009, which would have freaked out a lot of people whilst cash held still rose in this period. Suggests mid 2009 would have been the right time to switch from cash to shares. although hindsight means we would not know this at the time.

 

I ask about the balanced portfolio constituents because it would be interesting to see how this correlates with an index, like the ftse100/250.

Share this post


Link to post

I guess they didn’t want to take the absolute BEST scenario, and instead have shown that even at the worst case (just before the crash) tracker funds are still far better. A 25% loss would be hard to deal with for 3 years tho. I wonder what the gain would look like if you had got in at the bottom...

 

This reminds me of that warren Buffett bet where he bet an index tracker would be cheaper and higher rate of returns over a managed portfolio. I don’t have a link but will post when of mobile.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Hi

 

For this ‘Balanced’ portfolio I used three instruments. The weight in the portfolio given to each is given too...

 

  1. 48% - Developed market equities (MSCI World Net Total Return Index)
  2. 48% - UK government bonds (FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts Total Return Index)
  3. 4% - Gold (LMBA Gold Price)

I crunched the numbers for you and over this period the FTSE 100 returned 84% while the FTSE 250 grew by 169%. In comparison, the ‘Balanced’ portfolio I constructed using the 3 indices above was up 82%, extremely close to the FTSE 100 total return! 

 

Total return.PNG

 

However, the maximum drawdown (peak-to-trough) for each index/portfolio shows why diversification across asset classes can help to smooth your investment returns. 2008 was a painful period for most investors (circled in chart below). The largest drawdown was -43% for the FTSE 100, -47% for the FTSE 250. But for this 'Balanced' portfolio it was half that at -21%.

 

This is the ideology that sits behind our suite of Smart Portfolios: Risk and Returns

 

Max drawdowns.PNG

 

 is also completely right. I started the chart before the 2008 financial crisis to show that even investing through the worst market scenarios, a buy-and-hold approach over this period has provided solid returns in comparison to leaving your cash in the bank.

Share this post


Link to post

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • IG ISA Season

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      6,371
    • Total Posts
      28,278
    • Total Members
      37,101
    Newest Member
    lulub2000
    Joined 18/03/19 15:55
  • Our picks

    • Flowless rally - APAC brief 18 Mar
      A flowless rally: It’s being dubbed the “flowless rally”. Equities are ticking higher, but without the fundamental buying-support one might assume. This is especially so when considering the milestone achieved on Wall Street on Friday. Finally, the 2815 resistance level has tumbled, and the bulls have cautiously, quietly rejoiced. There are yellow flags popping up here and there, however, and that is making participants wary. It goes back to this “flowless rally” business: the latest leg of global stocks big recovery isn’t being supported by investor flows. In fact, investor flows look to have diminished somewhat. The reasoning behind this move is somewhat speculative. The impact of share buybacks is one popular argument. Whatever the cause, confidence isn’t accompanying this rally.


      Economic conditions deteriorating: Maybe market participants are still scorned from the market correction in 2018. A bitterness and cynicism stemming from that is understandable. Much of the frustration comes, it would seem, from a widespread recognition that this rally has come in the absence of solid fundamentals. On the contrary, if looking at the macro-outlook, there are more reasons to be bearish than bullish right now. Global growth is (almost) irrefutably slowing, and some of the geopolitical sore-points dictating sentiment, like Brexit and the US-China trade war, are showing little new signs of progress. A major factor keeping this rally alive in riskier assets, perhaps concerningly, is a little case of “fear of missing out”.
      • 0 replies
×