Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Screening for Institutional Buying

Recommended Posts

I saw this article sometime ago (published June 2017) and thought to keep it to check on the progress of the recommendations. They came from a set of screener parameters designed to identify institutional buying of company stock.

Below are the charts to date of the companies recommended by the screener 1 year ago (June 2017). See link for screener specifics.

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/how-to-uncover-institutional-buying-cm806030

2086577050_JohnsonJohnson(AllSessions)_20180702_12_19.thumb.png.ea5b5905d5a2fb925c46169849ed433f.png448601207_NantKwestInc_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.394e9127ab3af8152b810f94b1f888dd.png979602540_DelekUSHoldingsInc_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.7c7fe7712aae88257719a970d74c588c.png2084426418_AbbottLaboratories_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.8502081cbcb0bad478eecfe18446f336.png436349077_WinnebagoIndustriesInc_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.38abed7199573797b185898ab64e28c0.png

Share this post


Link to post

so the parameters are

• Current Price greater than Price from 1 Week Ago
• Price from 1 Week Ago greater than Price from 2 Weeks Ago
• Price from 2 Week Ago greater than Price from 3 Weeks Ago

• Weekly Volume greater than Weekly Volume from 1 Week Ago
• Weekly Volume from 1 Wk Ago greater than Weekly Volume from 2 Wks Ago
• Weekly Volume from 2 Wks Ago greater than Weekly Volume from 3 Wks Ago

• Zacks Rank less than or equal to 3
• Price greater than or equal to $5
• Average 20-day Volume greater than or equal to 100,000 shares

Is there an easy method to look at these things? How do you do it? Charts seem to show varying degrees of success. Do you think the method works?

Share this post


Link to post

Hi @247trader,  the results are very good, 4 of the 5 had 6 months of gains from the June start date and 2 of those 4 the gains continue to date while the other 1 of the 5 had a ballistic 1 month gain before collapsing.

The top 6 on the screener list can be gleaned from a chart, the Zack's Rank is not so important (from article), don't include low priced stock (7) and the last one can be done roughly as it's just there to ensure sufficient liquidity to be able to get in and out.

I thought it looked relatively simple and performed very well over the sample of 5 picked stocks. Coupled with a moving average trailing stop all 5 would have made good gains.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,758
    • Total Posts
      65,526
    • Total Members
      86,260
    Newest Member
    Batma99
    Joined 22/10/20 01:26
  • Posts

    • Oh look, trillions of dollars sloshing about seeking alpha and very little of it 'trickling down' to actual human beings.  No wonder there is no inflation.  You'd think somebody planned this all out or something*. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-fca/12-million-people-in-britain-will-struggle-to-pay-bills-watchdog-says-idUKKBN2763C5   * For those who'd like to know more about it: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf
    • Once again my mind cycles round to this idea of understanding wave structure and how Fibonacci ratios aren't useful on their own. But then I open up that book by Precther and Frost, and then I remember why I didn't go any further with EWP.
    • More downside to come after a brief bounce off the 76.4 🤓
×
×