Jump to content

ESMA and 50% margin close out rule


Recommended Posts

James, or anyone else at IG,

I'm not clear about the "slightly amended 50% margin close out rule" that is mentioned in the letter that came from IG . Could you give us an example of what it will mean? For example, suppose I have £5,000 in the account and have just one position open and that requires £300 margin. If the position moves £150 (half the margin requirement) against me, will I be closed out? It seems quite mad (but then so does a lot of ESMA).

Thanks!

Cate

Edited by cate
  • Like 1
Link to comment
3 hours ago, cate said:

James, or anyone else at IG,

I'm not clear about the "slightly amended 50% margin close out rule" that is mentioned in the letter that came from IG . Could you give us an example of what it will mean? For example, suppose I have £5,000 in the account and have just one position open and that requires £300 margin. If the position moves £150 (half the margin requirement) against me, will I be closed out? It seems quite mad (but then so does a lot of ESMA).

Thanks!

Cate

I think in this case you can have a loss of 4849 before they close anything, you still have 151 free margin?

but not sure

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Hey all. You can see our page on Spread Betting and CFD margin under ESMA here. 

If you had a £5000 starting balance and opened a position with a margin of £300 the following would happen.

At a loss of £4701 (99%) we would aim to send you a notification email.
At a loss of £4775 (75%) we would aim to send you another notification email.
At a loss of £4850 (50% margin, i.e. the market has moved against you and your loss is equal to your spare cash you had on the account, plus half the margin) we would start to close positions.
Your account would be left with £150 (50% of the initial margin used to open the position).

  • Like 2
Link to comment

What in a case of a guaranteed stop where the capital equals the margin for the guaranteed stop?
Will the position be closed at 50% between entering the position and the garanteed stop?
As normally one would not get a margin call in that case.
In case of Cryptocurrencies (50% margin) that would mean that you would have to put 100% down if your whole account would be commited to one trade, right?

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Guest FCapital

How does it work with leveraged accounts activated with collateral? 

I found this statement from your website: " If you are using the contents of your share portfolio as collateral to cover your margin requirements in your leveraged account then we can allow equity to drop to -50% of your collateral level before we start closing positions. We can’t guarantee that level, though, so you may find positions are closed before or after your equity reaches -50%." 

This is pretty vague, so can you explain a bit more about it with an example?  

 

 

Link to comment
On 7/10/2018 at 11:51 AM, Guest Mark said:

What in a case of a guaranteed stop where the capital equals the margin for the guaranteed stop?
Will the position be closed at 50% between entering the position and the garanteed stop?
As normally one would not get a margin call in that case.
In case of Cryptocurrencies (50% margin) that would mean that you would have to put 100% down if your whole account would be commited to one trade, right?

Thanks in advance

A guaranteed stop means that we guarantee to take you out of a particular trade at a particular level if the market gaps over it. It doesn't guarantee that you will be able to hold the trade to that level. Once your losses are at 50% margin then we will look to close our your position basis the new ESMA rules.

 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Guest FCapital said:

How does it work with leveraged accounts activated with collateral? 

I found this statement from your website: " If you are using the contents of your share portfolio as collateral to cover your margin requirements in your leveraged account then we can allow equity to drop to -50% of your collateral level before we start closing positions. We can’t guarantee that level, though, so you may find positions are closed before or after your equity reaches -50%." 

This is pretty vague, so can you explain a bit more about it with an example? 

Going forwards we won't have collateral linked accounts for non-professional clients under the ESMA umbrella. If you have a professional IG account (or are outside the region) you are exempt from this.

From a collateral point of view on a professional account, then the margin basically works the same way, however it is simply used on the margin side of things. You can see a greater run down example here.

 

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Malcom Pat

Hi there, I just wanted clarify how this would work for a very different type of case to those mentioned above.

Assuming i have £200 in cash in my account, and were to place it all into a trade position worth £1000, say for eg a spread bet on 1 share worth £1000.

Am I right in saying that, given that ALL the equity in my account is tied into the 1 trade, ie no other cash balance, that you obviously wouldnt let the share price drop to 600 as I would then be at minus 200 equity.

In that situation, at what share price would the trade be automatically closed out at?

Link to comment
Guest Arruda, C
On ‎05‎/‎07‎/‎2018 at 17:03, JamesIG said:

Hey all. You can see our page on Spread Betting and CFD margin under ESMA here. 

If you had a £5000 starting balance and opened a position with a margin of £300 the following would happen.

At a loss of £4701 (99%) we would aim to send you a notification email.
At a loss of £4775 (75%) we would aim to send you another notification email.
At a loss of £4850 (50% margin, i.e. the market has moved against you and your loss is equal to your spare cash you had on the account, plus half the margin) we would start to close positions.
Your account would be left with £150 (50% of the initial margin used to open the position).

Hey all.

Unless I'm missing something here, where does it 99% comes into play and on what? 99% of £300 is £297 but we're seeing £4,701! Or even 99% of £4,700 "remaining equity" is £4,653! So, I'm at a loss on how £4,701 was calculated.

I can see how the £4,775 and £4,850 was achieved but the same logic doesn't apply to the £4,701 value. From what I can see, with the new rules basically one looses all their remaining equity plus up to 50% of it's required margin.

I'd appreciate some clarity on this please.

Thank you.

Carlos 

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Guest Arruda, C said:

Hey all.

Unless I'm missing something here, where does it 99% comes into play and on what? 99% of £300 is £297 but we're seeing £4,701! Or even 99% of £4,700 "remaining equity" is £4,653! So, I'm at a loss on how £4,701 was calculated.

I can see how the £4,775 and £4,850 was achieved but the same logic doesn't apply to the £4,701 value. From what I can see, with the new rules basically one loses all their remaining equity plus up to 50% of it's required margin

You are absolutely right on this one. I was too lax in my explanation when discussing mathematical examples which obviously given the example and use of figures I shouldn't have been. The 99% actually refers to 99.99% of the £300. In other words, as soon as the initial £300 margin  starts to get 'eaten' into (and not necessarily by a whole pound either). In the examples I rounded to the nearest percentage and nearest whole pound sterling. 

I won't edit the original example as this wouldn't give transparency to the remaining thread, but hopefully this clarifies. 

 

Link to comment
Guest RichB-Trader
On 04/07/2018 at 20:45, Kodiak said:

Would it be possible (probably not?) to use the new "ESMA settings" on demo account starting now to get used to and try out the new settings?

 

 

Hello,

 

When the ESMA kicked in the margin rates seemed to change, is this correct. i.e if I move to a Live account I will see no margin or functionality difference between the two. i.e I won't get closed out in a live account any different to what would happen in a Demo? Thanks.

Link to comment

Hey - I've just checked and can see that margin % are the same on both demo and live. Therefore they should be the same across the board. Double check margin requirements based on asset type if you would like to confirm for yourself - hope this helps. (e.g. below FTSE on Demo and Live - kinda odd to show the same image, but these are in fact taken from different environments.) 

2018-10-02 10_37_15-IG Trading Platform _ Spread Betting.png2018-10-02 10_36_23-IG Trading Platform _ Spread Betting.png

Link to comment
Guest trader1900

Hi there,

I am wondering if someone who resides in Europe can open an account with IG using a different office lets say in Australia or Switzerland in order to avoid the increased margin requirements? 

Many thanks

Link to comment
Guest RichB-Trader

Hello all,

 

Am I right the "main" change is the margin needed to cover trades. For example to do around 8 trades I needed £20k of margin on my typical equities. Now I need more like £35k. As long as you can get the cash together it doesn't seem to drastic, or am I missing something? 

Link to comment
  • 4 months later...
Guest Questionnaire

There is a 50% close out level set on your account. If you have a £5,000 cash balance and you were using £2,500 in margin reserved to place the trades that were live, at what level of equity would your account be at for the 50% close out level to take effect?

£1,250

£2,500

£3,000

£ 0

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      23,066
    • Total Posts
      95,482
    • Total Members
      43,680
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    KNMFT
    Joined 03/10/23 12:01
  • Posts

    • USDJPY Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge 4 Hour  Chart, 3 October 23 U.S.Dollar/Japanese Yen (USDJPY) 4 Hour Chart USDJPY Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function:  main Counter Trend Mode: corrective Structure:5 of C Position: Y of Z of 2 Direction Next lower Degrees:Red wave 3   Details:  wave 5 of C in play and near to end  . Major Wave Cancel invalid level: 151.983 The USDJPY Elliott Wave Analysis on 3 October 23, examines the 4-hour chart of the U.S. Dollar/Japanese Yen (USDJPY) currency pair. This analysis utilizes the Elliott Wave theory to gain insights into potential market trends and price movements, with a particular focus on counter-trend movements.   The chosen Function for this analysis is "main Counter Trend," indicating a primary emphasis on identifying and interpreting market movements that run counter to the prevailing trend. In this context, the analysis aims to capture potential corrective moves within the broader Elliott Wave structure.   The Mode specified for this analysis is "corrective," suggesting an anticipation of corrective price movements. Corrective waves often denote temporary interruptions in the existing trend, with the expectation of a trend reversal or a new trend development.   The Market Structure identified is "5 of C," highlighting the specific wave sequence within the Elliott Wave framework that is under scrutiny. Understanding and analyzing wave sequences are crucial for gaining insights into potential market dynamics.   In terms of Position, the analysis refers to "Y of Z of 2," which provides context regarding the current wave position within the broader Elliott Wave structure. This indicates that the analysis is focused on the development of this particular wave sequence.   The Direction Next Lower Degrees is specified as "Red wave 3," emphasizing the analysis's concentration on monitoring and interpreting the ongoing Red wave 3 within the larger Elliott Wave framework.   In the Details section, it is noted that "wave 5 of C" is currently in play and is approaching its potential completion. This suggests that the corrective wave sequence is reaching its final stages. The "Major Wave Cancel invalid level" is identified as 151.983, serving as a critical reference point for risk management and potential trade entry or exit levels.   To summarize, the USDJPY Elliott Wave Analysis on 3 October 23, indicates a corrective phase within the Elliott Wave framework, with a primary focus on the ongoing "wave 5 of C." Traders are advised to closely monitor this wave's progression, considering the specified invalid level as a potential reference point for risk management. This analysis provides valuable insights for those trading the USDJPY currency pair, particularly for those looking to capitalize on counter trend opportunities.   Technical Analyst : Malik Awais    
    • Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge Daily Chart, 3 October 23, Bitcoin/U.S. dollar(BTCUSD) BTCUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Flat Position: Wave((C)) Direction Next higher Degrees: wave II of Motive Wave Cancel invalid level: 28635 Details: Wave ((C)) trend move to 138.2% of Wave ((A)) at 23214.83 Bitcoin/U.S. dollar(BTCUSD)Trading Strategy: The violent increase from Level 26026 destroyed the Triangle Formation, but even so, the W.C.Invalid Level was not destroyed. We are still looking for a wave 5 decline. Bitcoin/U.S. dollar(BTCUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is above the MA200 indicating an uptrend, RSI is a Bullish divergence. TradingLounge Analyst: Kittiampon Somboonsod, CEWA Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge 4H Chart, 3 October 23, Bitcoin/U.S. dollar(BTCUSD) BTCUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Double Corrective Position: Wave 4 Direction Next higher Degrees: wave ((C)) of Flat Wave Cancel invalid level: 28635 Details: the increase in wave 4 before decline in wave 5 Bitcoin/U.S. dollar(BTCUSD)Trading Strategy: The violent increase from Level 26026 destroyed the Triangle Formation, but even so, the W.C.Invalid Level was not destroyed. We are still looking for a wave 5 decline. Bitcoin/U.S. dollar(BTCUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is above the MA200 indicating an uptrend, RSI is a Bullish momentum.
    • As forecasts of a luxury consolidation grow ever louder, Xiaolin Chen, head of international at KraneShares, tells IGTV financial analyst @AngelineOng why higher-end names like Hermes, Gucci and Dior will still do well.  Angeline Ong | Financial Analyst, Presenter and Content Editor, London | Publication date: Tuesday 03 October 2023 14:04 (Video Transcript Summary) Chinese overseas spending set to rise Dr Xiaolin Chen from KraneShares speaks to IG financial analyst Angeline Ong about the current trends in China's consumption and luxury stocks. Dr Chen says that while many Chinese people are choosing to travel within China during the Golden Week holiday, overseas spending is expected to decrease. This could be because of personal preferences and travel restrictions. However, Dr Chen believes that Chinese people will continue to travel abroad for holidays in the future. When it comes to luxury stocks, Dr Chen explains that Chinese households have become wealthier, leading to more spending on luxury brands. Chinese consumers now prefer more expensive and exclusive luxury brands, and they are also buying from local Chinese brands. The price difference between luxury brands sold domestically and abroad has decreased, making shopping locally more appealing. K-Lux fund targets luxury brands Dr Chen says popular luxury brands like Hermes, Gucci, Dior and Chanel are loved by Chinese consumers. However, she noted that these brands may have had a temporary increase in revenue after reopening and might need to make some adjustments now. She also mentions that the growing middle class in China, comprising some 700 million people, is a significant consumer base for both high-end and more affordable luxury brands. To target this market, KraneShares has launched a fund called K-Lux. Using cleaner energy alongside fossil fuels In terms of the energy sector, Dr Chen talks about the global shift toward decarbonisation and the role of oil and fossil fuel companies. She acknowledged the challenges of balancing the transition to cleaner energy sources with the continued use of fossil fuels. Dr Chen highlights China's commitment to reducing carbon emissions and mentions that the country is investing heavily in green energy technologies. Dr Chen also discusses the inflow of investments into Chinese equities. Since Chinese A-shares were included in global indices in 2018, there has been a positive net inflow of investments each year. Despite some mixed economic data and outflows in 2023, institutional investors have shown confidence in the Chinese market by strategically positioning themselves for long-term allocations. Dr Chen believes that with supportive policies and positive data releases, investor sentiment toward Chinese equities will improve in the coming months.     This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
×
×
  • Create New...
us