Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Which NEW crypto asset are you most interested in?

We want to know which crypto assets you are most interested in. Use the voting tool below to pick which of the seven you are most interested in (Question 1), and then any other crypto assets you are also interested in (Question 2). Please include your Q1 answer in your Q2 choices.

Votes will remain anonymous to others on the public trading forum, but they could help shape the future of IG. Polls will remain open until July 31st so make sure you cast your vote and share the page with others who you know are interested in crypto.

You will need to be logged in to vote.

Message added by JamesIG

Which NEW crypto asset are you most interested in?  

44 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. I am most interested in... (pick one)

    • Dash
      2
    • EOS
      7
    • ETC
      2
    • IOTA
      4
    • Monero
      2
    • NEO
      6
    • Stellar
      19
  2. 2. I am also interested in... (multiple choice)

    • Dash
      17
    • EOS
      24
    • ETC
      13
    • IOTA
      16
    • Monero
      13
    • NEO
      17
    • Stellar
      19


Recommended Posts

The briefest of brief overviews of the crypto assets above. 

Dash - An open source peer-to-peer cryptocurrency with a focus on instant transactions, and private, self governed organizational structure. This was actually a fork of the original bitcoin software.

EOS - previously a cryptocurrency token issued on the Ethereum network, EOS now has it's own mainnet and claims to operate as a smart contract platform "for the deployment of decentralized applications and a decentralized autonomous corporation."

ETC - known as Ethereum Classic, the ETC cryptocoin split from the more popular ethereum network after the DAO incident. 

IOTA - rather than a blockchain this coin promotes a web or 'tangle' of connections, and is aimed for use in the 'internet of things'. 

Monero - created in 2014 this coin focuses on decentralization and privacy. In the same way as bitcoin and other cryptos this coin uses a public ledger to record transactions and new units are created via mining. 

NEO - Aka the Chinese version of Ethereum and formerly referred to as 'ant shares'.

Stellar - Founded by Jed McCaleb (founder of Mt Gox and co-founder of Ripple) in 2014, Stellar aims to work as a payments network with a focus on non-profits and the developing world.  

  • Great! 2

Share this post


Link to post

I really do hope that we see the likes of Stellar and IOTA soon on IG's cryptocurrency platform. This is a good idea. Asking the IG Community to advise IG which crypto asset they are most interested in. It makes sense as they are the foundation of the company as without them IG would not make money or profit. 

One of my biggest issues with IG was that if offered Ripple only after the mammoth, gigantic, crazy move upwards had more or less finished. Now that is fine as there was money to be on the short side. One could also use leverage on a spread bet and really maximise the fall in Ripple. If you see one of my previous posts then you will see that I had use another platform that offered Ripple. If IG want to be market leading then it is to act first before the competition and be proactive and lead the way.

IG need to have a offering where it offers the top 10 by market cap and then in the future maybe even the top 20. Now I know this is a long way away but crypto trading is really gaining some momentum. With the likes of RobinHood and Revolut offering cryptos, it is only a matter of time before this is being seen more and more.

Well done to IG for offering its clients the chance to influence which cryptos IG may offer on its platform next. It is very much appreciation and a shrewd but sensible move.

  • Thanks 1
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Guest trend trader

Very keen on this one. Think it's cheesy but the 'built by traders for traders' thing should be followed more and its good to get the vote of the people who are trading on ig

Share this post


Link to post

really surprised that Stellar is more than EOS because of it's market cap. What am I missing and why can someone above let me know or give an opinion.

cheers

phil

Share this post


Link to post

Phil, 

I may have done a post on Stellar / Ripple a while back but I cannot remember. Stellar is decentralised and its partnerships are impressive. 

https://www.stellar.org/

Some of the partnerships from memory are IBM, Deloittes, Stripe, ICICI Bank and Wipro.

Share this post


Link to post

Stellar a clear winner in Question 1, but EOS by a nose in Question 2. What does that tell us!

Share this post


Link to post

@JamesIG, you will see that I have already posted this yesterday evening on the IG Community. I am sharing important news quicker than IG itself!

LOL

?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

I always wonder on this 'partnership' articles how much importance they actually have when it comes to the names. Obviously the ethereum foundation really benefited from those names in the EEA which caused a significant spike, but now I feel the media just jump on it without going into the details.

  1. what does IBM actually plan to do?
  2. what is their investment? either monetary or dedicated resources?
  3. any roadmap on this one?

would be interested to hear peoples ideas.

Phil

Share this post


Link to post

Thank you to all who voted. Please see the results below... 

image.png

...and therefore 

image.png

Your feedback has a direct impact on the future of IG. 

Cheers
James

Share this post


Link to post

@JamesIG,

I am now back in the UK after a month away. First of all thank you. Investors and traders can now begin to start building a more diversified crypto portfolio.

Have IG thought of offering its clients an investment vehicle by which IG manages the crypto portfolio and the clients invest in it. IG could call it the IG Crypto Fund.

It could have say 50% in Bitcoin and then 20% in Ether and the remaining 30% in alt coins. This is just an example but obviously it will be up to IG in terms of how the split and allocations work. After all it will need to deliver a strong and resilient annualised return for its clients. 

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,620
    • Total Posts
      39,070
    • Total Members
      49,233
    Newest Member
    alexserfu
    Joined 17/10/19 17:13
  • Posts

    • Hi everyone,  so, those of you following my FTSE - Daily Trades thread may know, I'm looking for new strategies to tackle the market. Was starting to think about this today and made a few thoughts. First one I came up with in the process is the following and utilises 'Andrew's Pitchfork' a rather odd name for a simple principle.   Thought Process I was going back to the basics and starting to think about the fundamentals of trading: Buy low and sell high. Or go short high, and buy back low later. So the key of my new strategy has to somewhat depended on these fundamental trading principles. Next I was thinking, looking at a chart, in what region can the price considered to be "low" and in what region would I consider it to be "high". I was looking at a 5min chart and looking at the whole day. I was drawing one line at the low of day, one line at the high of day, those are obviously the extremes where everyone can agree prices are low / high. Then I draw a line right in the middle between the two, where the price is neither high nor low. Then I draw a line at 25% and one at 75% and said, if the price is between the low of day (0%) and 25%, I consider the price to be low. If the price is between 75% and high of day (100%) I consider the price to be high. In between (25%-75%), it's neither high nor low. If I'd somehow manage to always buy in the low range and sell in the high range (or go short vice versa), then this could be a decent strategy. The next problem I was facing is, I've done this analysis on the previous day, where we know high and low of day. How can this strategy work out for future price movements, where high and low of day are unknown. Andrew's Pitchfork This is where the Pitchfork comes in. The assumption I'm making is that if I extrapolate the 4 required levels (low of day, high of day, 25% and 75%) from the previous day to the following day, the strategy still works. This is because more often than not, prices move up and down around a certain level, without breaking away from it and moving onto the next level. (This obviously has to be proven with data - more to that later) The way the pitchfork works is exactly how the 4 required levels are drawn up. The pitchfork is defined over 3 points: High, Low and Mid-point. It then draws 5 levels on the chart: High (100%), 75%, Mid (50%), 25%, Low (0%) So how does it work The way I imagine it to work is the following: 1) Identify previous day's high and low 2) Draw the pitchfork in the chart with aligning its high and lows on the daily high and low. The mid point is exactly in the middle of daily high and low. This draws a horizontal pitchfork in the chart. 3) When the price of the asset falls below 25%, place a buy stop order at the 25% level. Once the price rises again and breaks through that level, the order gets executed. (vice versa with shorting above the 75% level) 4) Stop Loss is right below (size of the spread) the low of the pitchfork. Target is somewhere above 50%-75%. You have at least a 1:1 risk-to-reward ratio. Need to calculate target level by asset based on historic patterns. Does it work? Don't know yet. So far I've manually painted a few of those pitchforks in the chart for the past couple of days on FTSE100, NASDAQ, CL and NG and it seems it works more often than it doesn't. Cases where it clearly doesn't work is when there's a strong move to either direction, aka price breaks-out and moves to a different level than it was the day before. Interestingly when this happens, the strategy wouldn't necessarily always result in a loss, but sometimes the entry conditions would never be triggered in the first place. E.g. if we start the day already in the high region (above 75%) and then never fall below it - no order triggered on that day. On the negative side, huge breakout opportunities are missed with this strategy, so worth looking into a complementary strategy which works specifically for break-outs. Next steps Next, I'm trying to backtest the strategy. Will need to pull a whole lot of data and analyse. Hope to have that done over the weekend. Will update the thread accordingly. Data I'm trying to get: Win ratio, Where's the optimum take profit level, Time of day where this usually plays out (my idea is to hook this in with the ATR analysis I've done and trade this pattern at times of high ATR, aka FTSE, DAX in the morning, NASDAQ, NG, CL in the afternoon)  First success First successful example trade taken this afternoon on CL. You see nicely how the pitchfork is drawn on the chart and is derived by the high and low of the previous day. At 14.30 today the price dipped below the 25% level. I set the buy stop order at the 25% level, which got triggered at 14.35. The price afterwards makes a sweep move up to the 50% level, where my limit sell order gets triggered at 15.15. It would've been possible to play it up until the 75% level, but wanted to be safe, without having the data yet. Could've been luck - who knows.   What do you think of this approach?        
    • just to add to bigdeal's reply SBs can be either cash/daily funded bet or futures/forward which have a separate chart accessed from the dropdown box next to the chart title. for cash/dfb there is no expiry but you paid an overnight interest fee, this charge does not apply to futures/forwards which have a larger spread instead. see pic.
    • https://www.home.saxo/insights/content-hub/articles/2019/10/17/emerging-market-stocks-just-break-out-of-a-20-month-downtrend
×
×