Jump to content
  • 0

Pro Order Problems


Guest lorenzo59

Question

Guest lorenzo59

hello, I have been claiming several days the problems in Pro Order, but nothin has been solved.

I fear I have to change broker for my automatic operativity on CFDs.

Backtests on Demo account, in fact, still remai completely different from those on real account.

Best regards.

lorenzo di lucia

(milan)

Link to comment

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Hi @lorenzo59, you may find the answer in this link to a thread in the prorealcode forum here.

Demo can't react the same as live, demo platforms were originally designed to allow experimentation and testing by technical staff, clients can to use them to learn the live platform format. But whether the performance of another brokers demo will be better? 

https://www.prorealcode.com/topic/different-behaviour-between-live-and-demo-account/

Link to comment
2 hours ago, lorenzo59 said:

hello, I have been claiming several days the problems in Pro Order, but nothin has been solved.

I fear I have to change broker for my automatic operativity on CFDs.

Backtests on Demo account, in fact, still remai completely different from those on real account.

Best regards.

lorenzo di lucia

(milan)

Do you mean

Backtests on demo account completely different than backtests on real account?

If so maybe something with time settings? check in history so that the trades opens and close at the same time?

 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Staking is the cornerstone for Network security in proof of stake (pos) and 32 ETH requirement for becoming a validator remain a stumbling block to many potential participants in Eth transition to pos. This was why one analyst recently praised Puffer Finance and claim it could increase participation since users can participate in Ethereum staking with as little as 1 or 2 ETH, especially with the anti-Slashing Technology. I didn’t pay much attention to his analysis since I didn’t have 1 eth to stake during the testnet stage but will this have any impact on eth staking participation?  
    • What caught my eye is their focus on empowering creators in the crypto world. As someone who's always been interested in the creator economy, I'm really curious to see how their MUA7648 protocol works. Apparently, it helps with the "modularization of AI agent assets" and supports unlimited issuance. Not entirely sure what that means in practice, but it sounds promising! Oh, and get this - they're running a trading event with a 500,000 MUA prize pool! 🎁 If you're interested, you need to register first. Trading starts on October 10th at 07:00 UTC. I've been reading up on their ecosystem, and it's pretty comprehensive. They've got MUA Academy for learning, MUA Cantina as a marketplace, MUA Labs for innovation, and something called MUAverse. With over 5,000 certified creators already on board, it seems like they're building a solid community.
    • With the uncertain nature of the market and insignificant airdrop rewards, exploring other strategies is a no brainer. While assessing liquid staking as a valid option, Puffer Finance reward easily appeals for its rewards and flexibility. With Puffer, anyone can benefit from both PoS and restaking earnings. Users can also stake ETH and receive liquid restaking token pufETH which appreciates as validators are added. In addition to its Liquid restaking rewards, PUFFER token's listing on Bitget is imminent providing various earning opportunities including a launchpool, PoolX etc. Puffer Finance has seen an exponential adoption since launch, could this listing and the opportunities it will unlock fast track its adoption?
×
×
  • Create New...
us