Jump to content
  • 0

Add trailing stop to a limit order


zala

Question

Why doesn't IG offer to set a trailing stop to a specific limit order?

Currently it only exists on market orders, and if one puts a limit order which gets filled, one has to manually put a trailing stop after the position has been executed.
Is there a way to fix this or does ProRealTime have this feature?

Link to comment

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Excuse my ignorance here but isn't a stop a trailing stop loss that you must actually keep updating manually? I mean if say your stop loss is a fall of 2p of current price I can't see how you can have an automatic trailing stop because it would just keep dropping up or down by 2p all the time. In other words a stop loss becomes trailing by you physically setting a revised stop loss in other words you have to keep doing it manually. some one correct me if i'm wrong here. I am curious to know more about this myself, thank you. 

Link to comment
  • 0

So the primary reason for this is the legacy code which means the two different stop types follow different logic paths in the deal flow. We have raised this previously as a discussion topic for our core dev team, however at the moment unfortunately it's just not a priority given the client request to dev time required to change 'ratio'. At the moment regulatory change, Mifid II, ESMA and new products have taken up our time. If there is an update I will be able to let you know. 

Until then you can turn on notifications. When you're limit order is filled you'll be able to edit a trailing stop manually. I appreciate this isn't ideal, however it is the best work around we have at the moment. 

Link to comment
  • 0
On 7/30/2018 at 7:57 PM, TrendFollower said:

@JamesIG,

The plus side of this is that it keeps traders in tune with market movements and their trades. The best trades are those which you live and breath. Editing a trailing stop manually with make sure traders are in tune with their trade. I know it is not idea but there are benefits if they want to be taken.

It depends on each traders individual psychological makeup.
I do not feel that I am rational when I trade and watch my trades.

I do planning each weekend, set limit orders, wait until they get executed and then oversee them a couple of times a day.

Link to comment
  • 0
On 7/30/2018 at 5:06 PM, JamesIG said:

So the primary reason for this is the legacy code which means the two different stop types follow different logic paths in the deal flow. We have raised this previously as a discussion topic for our core dev team, however at the moment unfortunately it's just not a priority given the client request to dev time required to change 'ratio'. At the moment regulatory change, Mifid II, ESMA and new products have taken up our time. If there is an update I will be able to let you know. 

Until then you can turn on notifications. When you're limit order is filled you'll be able to edit a trailing stop manually. I appreciate this isn't ideal, however it is the best work around we have at the moment. 

I see, but it should be included in your functionality.
Guaranteed trailing stops would be very nice too.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • 0
Guest 202925
On 7/30/2018 at 2:48 PM, Guest BMP said:

Excuse my ignorance here but isn't a stop a trailing stop loss that you must actually keep updating manually? I mean if say your stop loss is a fall of 2p of current price I can't see how you can have an automatic trailing stop because it would just keep dropping up or down by 2p all the time. In other words a stop loss becomes trailing by you physically setting a revised stop loss in other words you have to keep doing it manually. some one correct me if i'm wrong here. I am curious to know more about this myself, thank you. 

No Guest BMP. The system does it for you if when your trade is live, you select Trailing stop loss. Your set the initial stop Loss- lets say 10p, and a trailing stop of 2p. So if your share goes up 2p, your trailing stop will now be 8p (10p Initial-2p trailing adjustment). It move in line with your bet- you go long- trailing stop moves up.

You can do this manually, but having a trailing removes the stress of lets say another crash etc!

The guys here want this added to an initial order, which is a great idea. Will it happen??? Not a chance

Link to comment
  • 0
Guest Trailing Stop Limit Orders

Hi please could someone let me know if Trailing Stop Limit Orders have now become available on IG platform?

Thanks

popsys

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • If you had left a limit order based on the previous margin requirement, it's likely the system would've adjusted it to match the new rate once it changed. This helps prevent any unexpected margin calls. However, it's always wise to double-check your orders, especially when there are fluctuations in margin requirements. 
    • Just look at CZ's impact on Binance or Gracy Chen's leadership at Bitget. It's incredible how a visionary leader can propel an organization forward. Gracy Chen's track record speaks for itself – fourfold growth in two years is no small feat! With her at the helm, Bitget could indeed be on track to reach new heights.
    • Hey, have you all heard about this zkLink Nova project? It's supposed to be some next-level technology for Ethereum and Layer 2 networks, and I've been looking into it. I'm telling you, this could be massive! Alright, let me break it down for you. zkLink Nova is like an "Aggregated Layer 3 zkEVM Rollup network" built on top of zkSync's ZK Stack. I know, it sounds super technical, but hear me out. Basically, it's a way to integrate all the liquidity and assets from Ethereum and different Layer 2 rollups into one unified platform. Now, why is that a big deal, you ask? Well, right now, all these networks are like separate islands, you know what I mean? Their assets and liquidity are fragmented, and we have to use questionable bridges to move stuff around. It's a complete mess, and it opens up security risks like crazy. But with zkLink Nova, they're using some fancy zero-knowledge proof magic to let us access the combined liquidity without needing to bridge assets! Can you imagine that? It's like having one massive, happy DeFi playground with all the toys under one roof. No more hopping around networks or dealing with shady bridge protocols. Just pure, unified liquidity and assets at our fingertips. The possibilities for dApp developers with that kind of power are insane! And get this – the zkLink team has already lined up over 60 partners to help steer this Layer 3 ecosystem! We're talking big names like Coinbase Ventures and Arrington Capital, who have already invested a whopping $23M into the zkLink ecosystem's development. I'm telling you, this Nova thing could be a game-changer for the Ethereum and Layer 2 space. It's like they're solving one of the biggest headaches we've had in DeFi with all these incompatible networks. Oh, and here's the kicker – the $ZKL token, which is the native token for the zkLink ecosystem, is now available for premarket trade on Bitget! This could be our chance to get in early on what might become the backbone of a whole new era of DeFi interoperability. But I want to know what you all think. Are you buying into the zkLink Nova hype? Or do you think it's just another overhyped project promising the moon? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!
×
×
  • Create New...
us