Jump to content
  • 0

Add trailing stop to a limit order


zala

Question

Posted

Why doesn't IG offer to set a trailing stop to a specific limit order?

Currently it only exists on market orders, and if one puts a limit order which gets filled, one has to manually put a trailing stop after the position has been executed.
Is there a way to fix this or does ProRealTime have this feature?

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Guest PandaFace
Posted

I’ve always wondered this too...

  • 0
Posted

Excuse my ignorance here but isn't a stop a trailing stop loss that you must actually keep updating manually? I mean if say your stop loss is a fall of 2p of current price I can't see how you can have an automatic trailing stop because it would just keep dropping up or down by 2p all the time. In other words a stop loss becomes trailing by you physically setting a revised stop loss in other words you have to keep doing it manually. some one correct me if i'm wrong here. I am curious to know more about this myself, thank you. 

  • 0
Posted

So the primary reason for this is the legacy code which means the two different stop types follow different logic paths in the deal flow. We have raised this previously as a discussion topic for our core dev team, however at the moment unfortunately it's just not a priority given the client request to dev time required to change 'ratio'. At the moment regulatory change, Mifid II, ESMA and new products have taken up our time. If there is an update I will be able to let you know. 

Until then you can turn on notifications. When you're limit order is filled you'll be able to edit a trailing stop manually. I appreciate this isn't ideal, however it is the best work around we have at the moment. 

  • 0
Posted
On 7/30/2018 at 7:57 PM, TrendFollower said:

@JamesIG,

The plus side of this is that it keeps traders in tune with market movements and their trades. The best trades are those which you live and breath. Editing a trailing stop manually with make sure traders are in tune with their trade. I know it is not idea but there are benefits if they want to be taken.

It depends on each traders individual psychological makeup.
I do not feel that I am rational when I trade and watch my trades.

I do planning each weekend, set limit orders, wait until they get executed and then oversee them a couple of times a day.

  • 0
Posted
On 7/30/2018 at 5:06 PM, JamesIG said:

So the primary reason for this is the legacy code which means the two different stop types follow different logic paths in the deal flow. We have raised this previously as a discussion topic for our core dev team, however at the moment unfortunately it's just not a priority given the client request to dev time required to change 'ratio'. At the moment regulatory change, Mifid II, ESMA and new products have taken up our time. If there is an update I will be able to let you know. 

Until then you can turn on notifications. When you're limit order is filled you'll be able to edit a trailing stop manually. I appreciate this isn't ideal, however it is the best work around we have at the moment. 

I see, but it should be included in your functionality.
Guaranteed trailing stops would be very nice too.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • 0
Guest 202925
Posted
On 7/30/2018 at 2:48 PM, Guest BMP said:

Excuse my ignorance here but isn't a stop a trailing stop loss that you must actually keep updating manually? I mean if say your stop loss is a fall of 2p of current price I can't see how you can have an automatic trailing stop because it would just keep dropping up or down by 2p all the time. In other words a stop loss becomes trailing by you physically setting a revised stop loss in other words you have to keep doing it manually. some one correct me if i'm wrong here. I am curious to know more about this myself, thank you. 

No Guest BMP. The system does it for you if when your trade is live, you select Trailing stop loss. Your set the initial stop Loss- lets say 10p, and a trailing stop of 2p. So if your share goes up 2p, your trailing stop will now be 8p (10p Initial-2p trailing adjustment). It move in line with your bet- you go long- trailing stop moves up.

You can do this manually, but having a trailing removes the stress of lets say another crash etc!

The guys here want this added to an initial order, which is a great idea. Will it happen??? Not a chance

  • 0
Guest Trailing Stop Limit Orders
Posted

Hi please could someone let me know if Trailing Stop Limit Orders have now become available on IG platform?

Thanks

popsys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Lately I’ve been following AIXBT by Virtuals for a bit, and I’m not gonna lie, it’s making me wonder about the direction AI is taking in the crypto space. Kinda seen a lot of hype around AI lately on X and different forums. So here’s my take, instead of just applying AI to the usual market analysis, AIXBT is talking about AI agents that could actually be co-owned and tokenized like digital assets that interact with games, social platforms, and even manage wallets. More findings in the whole co-ownership thingy, which is a great idea especially with the blockchain aspect. A lot of people are talking about how AI could help boost revenue across different platforms, but I’m still skeptical about how this will actually work in practice. These agents are supposed to be able to do things like pick up a sword in Roblox or interact on TikTok, but will they actually change the way users engage with digital spaces? Couple of top exchanges like BINGX already listed $AIXBT which is a big deal, imho as it’s gaining some real traction already.  Notwithstanding, still thinking if this is the future of digital assets, or is it just another trend that’s getting way too much hype?
    • With Clanker native token recently listed on Bitget and already trading above $68, some people have start speculating that this AI-driven token deployment platform on the Base network could increase adoption on the blockchain due to some various reason such as; 1. Ease of Token Creation: Clanker simplifies the process of token creation to the point where it's accessible to anyone with basic social media skills. Users can deploy tokens by simply tagging Clanker on the Farcaster platform, describing their desired token, thereby lowering the entry barriers for token creators and potentially attracting a broader user base to the Base ecosystem. 2. Community Engagement and Viral Potential: The integration of token deployment with social media platforms like Farcaster encourages community participation. Memes and viral content can naturally lead to increased attention and, consequently, adoption. Clanker's tokens often become memes themselves, which can drive speculative interest and trading volume, furthering the network's visibility 3. Profit Sharing Mechanism: Clanker's model includes sharing a portion of the fees with the users who request token deployments. This financial incentive could encourage more people to use Clanker for launching tokens, thus increasing activity on Base. The promise of earning from the liquidity pool fees makes it an attractive proposition for users looking to participate in the crypto space in a potentially profitable manner. 4. Innovation in Tokenomics: By introducing tokens like LUM, which were autonomously created through AI collaboration, Clanker showcases innovative tokenomics. This not only promotes the idea of AI in blockchain but also piques interest in how tokens can be generated, possibly drawing tech enthusiasts and investors curious about new token models. 5. Fostering Decentralized Social Interaction: Clanker's operation within the Farcaster ecosystem highlights how blockchain can intersect with decentralized social networks. This intersection can lead to new forms of interaction and economic models where social engagement directly correlates with token creation, potentially making Base a hub for such activities.  6. Market Activity Boost: The surge in transaction volumes due to Clanker's activity indicates its substantial impact on the network's activity. High transaction volumes often correlate with increased interest and investment in a blockchain, which could lead to greater adoption as more participants are drawn to where the action is.   Is obvious that these factors could increase adoption to base chain but what do you think?
    • I just claimed my allocation to bitget since there is $0 gass fee for claiming. I hope this project cooks 
×
×
  • Create New...
us