Jump to content

FTSE topping pattern & implications

Recommended Posts

I track FTSE250 on a regular basis because it is a large index & has proven it's worth as a bellwether.  While obviously correlated with the FTSE100, it also has very good correlation with $SPX. The reason for posting this commentary is that the FTSE250 monthly shows an important topping pattern called an expanding pivot (using Dr Alan Andrews terminology (pitchfork fame)). This is also known as a "broadening top" for Classical Charting & a 5-point reversal (Gartley). These signals are not common on long term charts & while there is still a probability that the pattern might fail, the first significant retracement will give a lot more information. 

FTSE250 topped 5 months earlier than $SPX in 2007 & also found a bottom in 2008 relative to the $SPX in 2009. The two seem well correlated, but FTSE250 can lead as shown historically. The green line on the FTSE250 chart is SPX (for comparison).

For those not familiar with this expanding pivot pattern, there are examples on $DJTA weekly (2008), $XJO weekly (2007) & more recently on $TSX300 weekly. 

Why do I look at monthly & weekly charts? Helps to keep me focused on the big picture, so I can trade the smaller picture more effectively. The first retracement on weekly & daily will be very important to watch. 

tradingmotives.com

MCX.X FTSE250 M 20181023.png

$TRAN W 2008.png

$XJO W 2007.png

$TSX300 W 20181022.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

maybe it's because it's early ... but what are you saying here? :| FTSE250 is looking to reverse and is likely to **** off in the longer candle stick time frames?

Share this post


Link to post

Yep @TradingMotives I recognise the expanding wedge pattern as an ending pattern when things get volatile in the battle between Bulls and Bears before an eventual capitulation and reversal.  However as I don't see this on any of the main markets I am unconvinced we have yet seen the top out.  It could well be that we have seen the top on the smaller Cap markets, that would be seen as more risky, and a shift into large Cap (relative safety) could push a final leg rally.  Given I can't see a similar correlation with the Russell 2000 (the US equivalent) and a general lack of correlations, I would not be betting the house on the FTSE250 at this stage.  No hurry to diagnose this one as if it is the end there is a long, long way to go.  You don't want to get caught in a short squeeze is the markets stage a significant rally...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,252
    • Total Posts
      35,941
    • Total Members
      45,954
    Newest Member
    Joe86
    Joined 20/08/19 01:38
  • Posts

    • Hi greetings from Singapore & finally someone started a thread on HSI.   😗
    • I am not so advanced like Mercury here but I could at least understand half of what he is talking about. Yes it did trigger me to consider the possibility of the bullish trend pushing price to 30000 levels.
    • Ah! The $64 million (billion, trillion) question! Where's the inflation? I'm afraid I can only offer my own thoughts on that....there are far better qualified people to be had elsewhere. Here are my personal thoughts/threads however.. QE was used (expanded the Fed balance sheet) to purchase US Treasury debt. Elsewhere same reason. It was intended that it would be rolled over as it matured and sold back to the market. Now there's doubt about that or at least some of it. It could just disappear. You're effectively buying your own debt...nice game, nice game....and if you can do that (with one hand on the money press) then you want it as cheaply as possible. If you're effectively the only buyer, you own the market and that itself drives yields lower. Wash,rinse,spin. Throw in some safe haven moments and you get to where we are today. Throughout the whole of the experiment, and that's what it is because no-one knows how this ends (although I expect badly) it became clear that the elites are getting richer...they were the ones with the assets after all. For assets include everything...stocks, property, antiques, paintings, wine etc. Everything Trump has in other words!. Their pay (board level) also got a huge boost in my opinion from performance related share prices due to unprecedented share buy backs - this is on going because credit has never been so cheap. Your pay almost certainly didn't increase. In fact in real terms it went backwards. Lots of studies support that thesis both in US/UK/Europe. The policy is now driving rates well below zero. Just when you thought rates can only go up from here (2016 low) they actually went lower and bonds were and still are the place to be! Wish I had bought Reagan's long term debt. I think this will continue and it links in with my thoughts about Japan the past two decades. Keeping rates below inflation (and they all do) effectively forces you to do your consumer bit and that was the justification/hope/smoke screen, take your pick!. We'll grow our way out of it - scenario 2 a few posts back. The wealth divide is a real concern now and they know it. In consumer led economies, if the consumer had access to that increased money supply and provides it with some velocity (i.e. gets it moving around the economy) THEN you get inflation. You don't have access to it.........yet. Assets are being held up by funny money. Any whiff the central banks (i.e who now ARE the market) will dial back causes immediate stock market roll overs. Draw your own conclusions. The other thought is simply this. Think of deflation as air leaving your tyre. You're pumping like mad to get it back in but however hard you try the tyre is getting flatter! The hole's too big. Deflation wins.....or if you manage to stabilise the pressure then stagnant growth at best. Possibly stagflation 70s style. Get the plaster on and whey, hey! Hyperinflation here we come. Hold gold. Just my penny worth!...and apologies for the length.
×
×