Jump to content
  • 0

Why close the poppers?


Bullyy

Question

Whilst I appreciate that IG is a broker and does need to make money. The fact that 79% of retail clients lose money should mean their business is very profitable.

However, I am getting pretty sick of seeing a stock that I want to day trade on my scanners only to find that this market is in close only mode, unavailable to trade or something similar. I understand that IG are not the only ones, Suretrader do this in a little less blatant fashion by removing leverage for these stocks however my main point is my first one. Why am I not able to trade the stocks that I want to trade? It's doing my head in and means I then need to go to other brokers that I have with a much worst platform. Whilst I love the IG trading platform, the basic fact that 79% of their retail clients are losing money means that they should be able to stomach this cost for those that are more experienced.

Any thoughts? Would love to hear from IG directly about this one.

?

Link to post

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I think this is more to do with risk rather than anything else. As a broker they just excecute your deal in the underlying market rather than it being against them so not really an issue. As caseynotes said liquidity and stuff like that. 

Link to post
  • 0

Hey - the availability of stock is down to a number of things including market cap, free float levels, short interest and liquidity. There are a number of other variables but these are the main ones. Stocks which fill these criteria will generally have significant volatility and potentially cause risks and problems for those dealing on leveraged share dealing accounts. Most of these you'll be able to deal via a share dealing account (if you're in a location which allows it) just not on leverage. 

It's in our interest to offer as many dealing opportunities as possible, not only because a successful trade is required to generate commission (or spread), but also because continuity and levels of services are important. These factors, however, shouldn't come with unnecessary risks such as those outlined above. 

Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,655
    • Total Posts
      68,263
    • Total Members
      57,140
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    poddsound
    Joined 17/01/21 19:20
  • Posts

    • I'll try to be concise: Dent was in 2010 calling for the mother of all stock market crashes - so were Elliott Wave International in fact EWI have been call for a massive collapse since 1986!  Some of what he says is accurate - deflation for example - the reason QE has not caused inflation is because it was issued in a deflationary cycle The crash he talks about won't happen - I listened to dent and EWI back in 2010 and I choose to do my own research as other things i was investigating suggested the opposite to what they were both spouting Read my Time Cycles page, it explains the deflationary/inflationary cycles - proven with 220+ years of stock market history behind the reasoning The deflationary cycle he refers to ended late 2016, its now inflationary according to my calcs and research and my prediction is stock market is going upwards until the mid 2030's when it will crash and top out - yet Dent still thinks its in play Up until then we might get a 1987 style crash event but overall the corrections will be modest not massive and they will all be quickly surpassed I don't listen to anyone out there - I trade independently according to my methods so I don't need to be buying and holding and if I'm wrong so be it - it won't affect my trading as the market dictates my positions, not my expectations - since 2010 this has work exceptionally well, where if I'd of followed EWI and Dents forecasts I'd of lost everything in 2010! I've no thoughts on Gold other than it is inflationary hedge - as mentioned on another thread when the stock market is inflationary (which I think started 2017) then price correlation backwards to last time it was inflationary (1982-2000) gold was subdued    
    • Thanks @Caseynotes. Do you think the time of the daily close bears any significance. When viewing the hourly charts, the volume and movements seem to be higher in GMT "working hours" and then slow down overnight. Therefore, are other countries trading on GMT I wonder?
    • Saw a snippet on Sky news complaining that the Lateral Flow test must be faulty because it wasn't picking up as many positives as the PCR. Quite an unbelievable misinterpretation of the data on the number of false positives made by the PCR. Not surprising really as the fake positive numbers generated by the PCR are the only thing driving project fear and lockdowns. Meanwhile, in order to stem the flow of staff needing to self isolate following a PCR false positive the NHS are switching to ...  er, the lateral flow test.         Dr Clare Craig  @ClareCraigPath Deaths are not climbing commensurate with cases. Either COVID got less deadly (despite inc hospital admissions) or we have two measure a) a community positive rate off the charts with false positives b) a hospital rate (likely to inc some real COVID) which is at a steady state     .
×
×
  • Create New...