Jump to content

Is spread betting for fools?

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

Anton Kreil's tactic

He seems to be following the time-honoured tradition which is to write books/perform paid speaking/provide training, which seems to be what a lot of people do just as soon as they get half a chance.  Reminds me of economics professors, who get paid to spout off a lot of nonsense to incredulous students.

Share this post


Link to post

Actually, respectable SB brokers want to keep their clients. Brokers provide a service which costs, of course, and they will make money out of both A and B book clients. As lose most of their trades and either need to improve their trading in which case they could possibly become Bs or they will simply run out of funds.  Bs are still profitable because the broker will hedge every trade (but at a better price than given to the trader) and therefore still make a profit - so this is where they want to see high frequency trading, or larger positions. But they have not 'banked' any profits (on the spreads at least) until a position is closed of course.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Caseynotes said:

Anton Kreil's tactic is to lay waste current perception of education, day trading and brokers in order to make room for his new Academy that educates traders to day trade via brokers.

Was more a bit of a joke from my side :D 

Truth is, nobody knows what's going on behind the closed doors, cause those inside won't tell it and those outside can only guess.

I'm not blindly believing what Anton Kreil or anybody else says in that respect, I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons of the information provided to see if it makes any sense for me.

So far, I think, the Ross Cameron /  Warrior Trading approach won't work with a UK spread betting account, because of too many restrictions applied and too large spreads.

The Anton Kreil tactic seems to be a bit different to what you hear from most of the other educators, so it caught my interest. If it actually works though, no clue, I would need to test it.

Would help if one of those Goldman Sachs dudes, would Vlog a day at a Goldman Sachs trading floor, so that we can make ourselves an image of what's going on without having to guess.

Share this post


Link to post
22 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Would help if one of those Goldman Sachs dudes, would Vlog a day at a Goldman Sachs trading floor, so that we can make ourselves an image of what's going on without having to guess.

not sure what the problem is, just get your wallet out, the courses are around 3k each and the mentoring starts at 3k and upwards depending on who you select, Anton will mentor you himself if you want (price on application).

As they say at the institute, "Firstly, Traders do not go out into the world to make people happy. They go out into the financial markets to make money." 🤣

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Caseynotes said:

not sure what the problem is, just get your wallet out,

😆

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post

I'm a little confused by your reasoning on the count of the contradictory statements in your post. 

On 22/09/2019 at 11:39, DSchenk said:

90% of retail traders lose money, so easy money to bet against them. They say brokers usually rate their clients into two buckets (with an algorithm), where 90% are in bucket A, where trades are un-hedged and the broker takes the other side of the trade.

With the above being the case, by what mechanism does the following scenario work?

On 22/09/2019 at 11:39, DSchenk said:

Once an organisation is found who is willing to do the attack on the oil facilities, the professional traders take their positions, long Crude Oil. Now they just need to wait until the attack happens. News are being released. Retail traders around the world jump on the news. Oil price spikes up. Professional Traders use the volume provided by retail traders to get out of their positions. Job done.

If the counterparty of retail traders is their broker then their trades are settled in a pool not connected (and of no influence) to the underlying market. So how then, do retail traders drive the price of oil up and provide volume to professional traders?

Share this post


Link to post
43 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

So far, I think, the Ross Cameron /  Warrior Trading approach won't work with a UK spread betting account, because of too many restrictions applied and too large spreads.

I'm still convinced you need to take another look at your scanner settings and your Choice of Shares.  Like I've said, you're not limited like he is.  We can trade from £0.24ppp to as much as our Margin Limit allows.

You seem to be good with Math so let me say this;

With only £1000 as Margin, you can only trade about £2pp comfortably on the FTSE.  Figures vary on avg. points moves per day (per Day = 24hrs) from 50 -100 as you've stated.  What this translates to is Cost per Point vs Points Moves vs Account Size.  So, Using the FTSE as a base, £2pp is the max.  In one hour averaging 5-10pts of movement,  in Half hour 2.5-5pt and in 15 mins 1.75-2.5; minumum.  let's just say 2-3 points in 15 mins.  Of course it can be more. 

So, trading FTSE for 15 mins with only 1K (it's important to note that the larger account size represents exponential rise in PPP) can make you anything from say £5 for 15 mins of risk/effort.  Here's the big tell though.  Every single day, shares go Up or Down.  All of them. (mostly all of them).  Trading with only 1k on the FTSE limits what you can make over points moved on average compared to trading Shares and Breakouts.

With 1k, anything from £0.24 to £20k (guess).  Sure the risk is bigger paying more ppp, sure the Spread is larger, but it's important to find a spread that is less than 5 and more like 2 or 3 pts.  It's As important to find Shares that move a lot more than the Spread to get in.  There's little point in trading an asset that has 3pt spread but only moves 3 pts.  Several of them yesterday were 3pts, but they moved about 20pts.

Anyway, lets' see what today brings. :D
 

Share this post


Link to post
42 minutes ago, LeoTrader said:

If the counterparty of retail traders is their broker then their trades are settled in a pool not connected (and of no influence) to the underlying market. So how then, do retail traders drive the price of oil up and provide volume to professional traders?

Interesting point, that's why I like to discuss these things here.

So, if retail traders trade primarily (90%) against their brokers, then they can't even influence the market price of an instrument? Is this what you are saying?
So Anton Kreil's statement that retail traders provide volume for institutional traders to get out of their trades is completely BS?

If I had let's say £1,000,000 in my spread bet account and take a very heavy position on an underlying asset with little volume compared to my big account - would this cause the asset price to move at all or not? If I merely bet against the broker it wouldn't right? If I would take the position on the real market it certainly would.

Very interesting point indeed, @LeoTrader. I might email this to one of the Anton Kreil dudes to explain if I find a contact form somewhere

Share this post


Link to post

It is the market which influences the price offered by the SB companies, not the other way round. The thing to remember is that SBs are bookmakers - they will reference the underlying prices, but will set their prices as they wish.  Actually they don't move very far from the underlying most of the time but there are times when they do - if they anticipate a strong move in either direction their quote will be ahead of the market. If any of you have accounts with different brokers you will sometimes see a difference in price because they use slightly different algorithms (which you could theoretically arb if you had the speed of execution - although this is almost impossible).  Your bet with the SB has no influence on the underlying. You would almost certainly be prevented from placing a very large bet anyway.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
31 minutes ago, nit2wynit said:

It's As important to find Shares that move a lot more than the Spread to get in

Yes, I think this might be the most important equation in the entire trading industry.

The KPI to look at is something like average true range / spread.

FTSE average true range is ranging between 50-100, so let's calculate with 75. Spread is constant 1 (during market hours).

KPI would be 75. (average move 75 x spread)

Stock xyz which gaps up 5%, typically makes (in the UK market) according to my statistics about 2%-5% afterwards.
Let's calculate with 5%. Spread is typically 1%-2%, in the morning hours straight after the GAP also sometimes 2%-4%. Let's take 2% for our calculation.
Meaning, the KPI would only be 2.5 (average move 2.5 x spread)

Thereby I conclude it is better for me to trade the FTSE index and try to capitalise on movements 75x spread size than on gappers where I need to manage to squeeze the most out of the 2.5 x spread range. The first one leaves much more room for error. Even if I'm wrong I can get out break-even cause all I need is a small move in my direction to get out. Where as with equities I need solid moves to even get to break-even.

What do you think @nit2wynit ?

Share this post


Link to post
19 minutes ago, BigDeal said:

It is the market which influences the price offered by the SB companies, not the other way round. The thing to remember is that SBs are bookmakers - they will reference the underlying prices, but will set their prices as they wish.  Actually they don't move very far from the underlying most of the time but there are times when they do - if they anticipate a strong move in either direction their quote will be ahead of the market. If any of you have accounts with different brokers you will sometimes see a difference in price because they use slightly different algorithms (which you could theoretically arb if you had the speed of execution - although this is almost impossible).  Your bet with the SB has no influence on the underlying. You would almost certainly be prevented from placing a very large bet anyway.

Like that concept.

What you explain wouldn't be the case though if the SB provider had to go out to the market every time you place a trade and hedge your position. Aka you go long on your SB account and IG goes to the market and goes long on the actual asset.

A few people have mentioned before though, that all positions are indeed hedged. Meaning your SB positions should influence the market.

Guess, we'll never know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
5 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Like that concept.

What you explain wouldn't be the case though if the SB provider had to go out to the market every time you place a trade and hedge your position. Aka you go long on your SB account and IG goes to the market and goes long on the actual asset.

A few people have mentioned before though, that all positions are indeed hedged. Meaning your SB positions should influence the market.

Guess, we'll never know for sure.

Yes, in theory your point is correct but in reality the SB company only needs to go the market if there is a mismatch - and in truth I would suggest there often isn't - eg you (and hundreds of other traders) are long, I (and hundreds of other traders) are short on the same market, and when these match, the SB can make profit on the full spread of everyone and doesn't need to hedge anyway. If they traded in the main market, the trade they place would therefore be inconsequential in the grand scheme of things, and if they couldn't hedge for some reason they would not allow you to place your bet.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Makes a lot of sense to me as you say it @BigDeal

Who wants to start a spread bet company with me? Sounds like easy money :D :D 

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
21 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

What do you think @nit2wynit ?

I think you're still confusing the Game plan.   If you still belive trading breakouts with SB doesn't work, we can leave it here and I'll prove it to you.....In time :D.  What you're stating re; FTSE is not Trading breakouts.  If you're not looking for that anymore and want a Long Game, then of course, go for Small over Longer hours.  Again 50-100pts in a DAY = 12am-12am-those points are avg for 24hrs.   Action happens at anytime through that day, so when you use 50-100 reference points a Avg. pt moves, you're not considering the trading hours which you'll be present. i.e 8am-?  For instance I'm sure you're aware that go up 10 come back 8 go up ten come back 8 so on etc throughout the day. 

Every equation for me takes into account risk vs reward vs Time, as Time for me is my most important asset.  I want to see return or even Loss; meaning Result, as soon as possible so I can get on with my life.  Providing i can find a decent Screener, i'll only be trading maybe 2-3 times per day win or lose within 1 hr.

So basically, i could place a trade on FTSE and go back to it 8 hours later to see it's gone up 50 points come down 30.  That's not the kind of game that suits me.  

What we have in common is Warrior Trading.  Trading Indicies is an entirely different set of rules and goals.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
46 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

So, if retail traders trade primarily (90%) against their brokers, then they can't even influence the market price of an instrument? Is this what you are saying?
So Anton Kreil's statement that retail traders provide volume for institutional traders to get out of their trades is completely BS?

Exactly. I recall an explanation from IG on how they operate; whereby long positions are matched with clients' short positions, thereby 'hedging' internally without needing to go to the underlying. When clients' positions in aggregate are mismatched by a certain threshold, it exposes them to risk, which they then hedge in the underlying market to cover their own risk. I doubt that happens every day though. 

1 hour ago, DSchenk said:

If I had let's say £1,000,000 in my spread bet account...

Stop right there. If you had £1,000,000 in your account you'd be on the B list, so definitely hedged! xD

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
18 minutes ago, BigDeal said:

Yes, in theory your point is correct but in reality the SB company only needs to go the market if there is a mismatch - and in truth I would suggest there often isn't - eg you (and hundreds of other traders) are long, I (and hundreds of other traders) are short on the same market, and when these match, the SB can make profit on the full spread of everyone and doesn't need to hedge anyway. If they traded in the main market, the trade they place would therefore be inconsequential in the grand scheme of things, and if they couldn't hedge for some reason they would not allow you to place your bet.

All these replies only showed after I just posted. What @BigDeal said!

Edited by LeoTrader

Share this post


Link to post

Well....I've disabled PRT for the Demo.......................................................................!

No Balance.  No Idea what the Spread it on the chart.  No Idea what the trade is going to cost to place until I try to place it.  Can't figure out how to place a stop on the chart Before I place the trade.  User Error?  Probably.  Back to page one.  I need a Pre-Market Scanner and I'll keep using the Web Platform.  Odds against you you say?  Pffft.

Edited by nit2wynit

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, nit2wynit said:

I need a Pre-Market Scanner

Give https://www.trade-ideas.com/ a go. Only US though. This is what Ross from Warrior Trading uses.

Demo account seems sufficient to me. Data is 20min delayed, but if you scan pre-market anyway shouldn't be a biggie

Share this post


Link to post

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeee!  Lots of money lost today.  Day trading is so much fun :D:D:D:D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post

Well, I have been trying many things out and I'm totally out of ideas.  About the only possibility I can see is very short-term trading on the back of breakouts, but this involves winning peanuts and risking your crown jewels.

The only reasonable chance I have seems to be to take long-term positions.  And in that case, it might just be better to buy shares, to avoid being 'stopped out' and getting your money stolen.  :D

Share this post


Link to post

Yes, everything is a risk and a gamble.  Most small businesses fail within a few years, but no one would discourage people to try and start successful small businesses. 

Yes, getting a law degree is boring as hell and costs a bomb - and you might not even get a job as a lawyer at the end of it.  But people's livelihoods depends on you going to university and paying for it. 

Everything is uncertain, the need to work is incessant, and nothing is 'real' except the force of gravity, ageing and death.

Isn't life in this godless universe a paradise?

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post

@dmedin,

There is nothing wrong with investing. I have been investing for many years and I still actively invest now. In fact I invest far more than I trade and I only use my profits from my investing to trade. 

Have a look at 'Pound Cost Averaging'. That is the approach I use and have done so for many, many years now. I only invest lump sums when there are major crashes, corrections, recessions, etc. I just keep investing as I am a 'High Risk Capital Growth ' investor. I will eventually switch to income funds rather than growth funds when I come closer to retirement but I am no where near retirement yet. 

I invest in investment funds, investment trusts, unit trusts, OEICS and ETF's. It is a great way to create long term wealth. Brokers and Fund platforms allow you to switch from one fund into another should there be new investment trends and themes which emerge. Creating an investment portfolio I think should be the foundation of any serious investor and this can then lead to trading to supplement it should you wish. If not then really work hard and create yourself a long term wealth creating investment portfolio. 

When I get time I will create a new thread in relation to this and will copy you in. I will give my own real examples in this area and then you can make you own decisions and come to your own conclusions. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
7 hours ago, dmedin said:

but this involves winning peanuts and risking your crown jewels.

Duuuudeeee WTF aRE you talking about?????  It's the Complete Opposite!!!!!  The point is to be consistent in your trades........Christ man.....The 1st thing i learned about Day Trading Trading was breakouts.......and you're telling me you haven't even tried it???????????????????

WTF have we been conversing about??  I've been asking abuot Platforms and Screeners.............and NOW you're talking about POSSIBLY Trading breakouts?? lol  You **** kidding me?

How Else did you think SB was going to Work?  It can Literally ONLY work SHORT Term OR Large ACCOUNT.

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post

@nit2wynit,

You make a valid point about large account. You cannot effectively use Spread Betting as a trading tool with a very small account. If your stop losses get triggered then you will be diminishing your capital in your account because you will have lost on that trade. If you don't use stop losses then you will be taking on huge risk and on the way to gambling. This is why I switch to trailing stops once my position is in profit. 

Capital size is important regardless of what anyone suggests and even more so in Spread Betting due to the use of leverage and margin requirements. If you have a small amount of capital and you have say less skill than the average trader then I am afraid it will not take long for your capital to be destroyed. 

I still maintain based on my own experience that Spread Betting can be an effective tool for the right trader with the right trading strategy. For the rest it could be a disaster waiting to happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
16 hours ago, nit2wynit said:

Duuuudeeee WTF aRE you talking about?????  It's the Complete Opposite!!!!!  The point is to be consistent in your trades........Christ man.....The 1st thing i learned about Day Trading Trading was breakouts.......and you're telling me you haven't even tried it???????????????????

WTF have we been conversing about??  I've been asking abuot Platforms and Screeners.............and NOW you're talking about POSSIBLY Trading breakouts?? lol  You **** kidding me?

How Else did you think SB was going to Work?  It can Literally ONLY work SHORT Term OR Large ACCOUNT.

lol yes indeed

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, DSchenk said:

Anyone cracked it yet? :D 

Cracked open the Piggy Bank for more pennies? ha.

Hope your hols were productive.

I wanted to quickly point something out to you re; your Scanner and settings etc.  

Take a look at Apple today.  Only moved 1%, but that equates to about 250 points from 9am with half of that in the 1st few mins. @ £0.50pp minimum.   You see the same rules don't apply with SB, so your search criteria is limiting your potential.  Do you see what I'm getting at?  :D

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, DSchenk said:

Anyone cracked it yet? :D 

There's nothing to crack ... it's just gambling

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,852
    • Total Posts
      41,397
    • Total Members
      51,714
    Newest Member
    Josephineke
    Joined 08/12/19 11:01
  • Posts

    • @Mercury, I think your 'cheekiness' may be rewarded. I am expecting a drop below 12000 on Arabica. 
    • yes, with Renko you are changing from time based charts to price based and so remove a lot of noise and smooth out  the price action hopefully giving a clearer picture.
    • The twitter bears are taking a lot of flak at the mo and with good cause, especially the likes of Edgeye and Zerohedge who called a recession in 2015 and were wrong so they just repeat the call every year since in the expectation of being right eventually. Amusingly enough many traders have build this psychology into their trading plan, imagine anyone trying to continually short a bull market for 5 straight years, and yet as I've pointed out for years using the sentiment data of IG clients short/long positions that's exactly what many have been trying to do. Here's the thing, you don't need to guess, a chart will tell you if it's bearish. As Chris in the podcast above says, a market making new all time highs just can't be anymore BULLISH, there is only one way to go. So if the chart lines up with the macro and both are clearly bullish 'buy high and sell higher'. Do yourself a favour and spend the 50 minutes to listen to the podcast, you will learn something.  
×
×