Jump to content

Is spread betting for fools?

Recommended Posts

Don't pay, just use the Demo. Works as well. Data is 20min delayed, but that doesn't make a big difference pre-market anyway

Share this post


Link to post

So, I'm eyeing:

  • APOP - leading gapper
  • TTS - great run yesterday, let's see if continuation
  • NLS - same
  • TEUM - same
  • QEP - 2nd Gapper
  • REZI - potential reversal (down 40% yesterday)

Share this post


Link to post
56 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Any game-plan for today @nit2wynit?

Same as yesterday though I've been distracted so  LITTLE LATE

I'll be going Long today though off the Bell. and see where we are in 10 mins.  

 

What is your search criteria for you watchlist and where did you get the info?

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Mix of ProRealTime and scanner on https://www.trade-ideas.com/ 

Think US open is too dangerous for me though. APOP just almost blew my account :D 

Danger is in Risk.  How can you blow your account with Stops in place? :O

Share this post


Link to post

Stops are almost useless in these momentum trades.

APOP got rejected at $4 and flushed down to $3.75 in mere seconds - whopp 25% of your account gone

TEUM would've been a good trade though - if we would've known :D 

Share this post


Link to post

So far the results are similar to all other days, but what is obvious is that choosing stock based on only 1% gap provides little afterward and usually Retrace within 5-10 mins.  So this means I need to be in right off the bell and out within 5 mins to take porfit.  

As you said yesterday the Spread vs % moved isn't big enough to reach potential.  This is likely why Ross always goes for 5% or more as his own backtesting said his successes were a lot less on stock below 5%

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Stops are almost useless in these momentum trades.

APOP got rejected at $4 and flushed down to $3.75 in mere seconds - whopp 25% of your account gone

TEUM would've been a good trade though - if we would've known :D 

I'm not sure we're playing the same game bud.  You can't Buy right off the Bell.  **** flies up and down.  you still need to wait for the 1st Pullback on 1M or 5M.  I'm only going in off the Bell to take notes.

my max risk on any one Trade is £100, but if I'm watching it I won't let it go past £50 or 5-10% 

 

Edited by nit2wynit

Share this post


Link to post

You're not playing Ross Cameron's game then - almost certain he's trading APOP today as well and might get burned on the same $4 rejection - sounds like a classic Ross move ("here I added to my position for the break of $4 - ah **** it") - let's see later when his market recap comes out :D 

I'm gonna head to Demo now and start searching for a job - don't think I can afford this any longer :D

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

You're not playing Ross Cameron's game then - almost certain he's trading APOP today as well and might get burned on the same $4 rejection - sounds like a classic Ross move ("here I added to my position for the break of $4 - ah **** it") - let's see later when his market recap comes out :D 

I'm gonna head to Demo now and start searching for a job - don't think I can afford this any longer :D

OH lol.

I'm testing the market at the minute.  Ross doesn't Buy off the Bell.  He still has his set In and Out markers.  What i mean by Off the Bell, is no-one shuold go in Blind on Faith until the direction is proven.  1st pullback.  Not off the bell.

Paypal going like a Yoyo.  See you in the Job Queue :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

So as I said going from only 1% Gap isn't do-able Unless you're ready to go In and Out within about 5 mins.  There's just not enough scope for a 2nd or 3rd Spike.  I can work, but you need to be in fro the Bell.  Too risky.

Tomorrow I'll be back to only 5% or more of stock less than £100.  I might even make it £50 or less.

 

11 trades, 4 Wins, 7 Losses.   The £56 Win is from Yesterday's experiment.  I missed market close.  It was actually up £120 at market open but was concentrating on the new list.  The amount doesn't matter.  It went Down. :D


Back to what Ross is doing or more specifically what he said to me personally.  With only 1k, you need to be Bold, be Brave but also be as certain as you can in your Trade choice.  He said to risk No-More than 10% with 1k.  It's important to understand that Risk isn't an amount but a % or Points moved in relation to the Pullback.  It just happens to represent a Cost.  What I mean is, if It's only likely to move 20 points and the Pull Back is 5 points then your Risk or Stop should be literally below the Pullback + Spread but should never be more than 10% of your account size.  So unsure of how you nearly lost 25%.

I'll take a look at the chart to see where you're coming from. :D

 

 

R3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, nit2wynit said:

He said to risk No-More than 10% with 1k

Probably overdone it with the position size. Went as high as margin allowed it. £3 per point. On a 25 point drop in a few seconds that's £75 right there (25% of £300)

Question is now, what shall be the plan going forwards? Figure it all out on Demo first and have then another try on live? Got almost £2k of losses now over the past 1.5 years. (Thinking about it this way, I certainly spent more money on even stupider stuff than spread betting :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
37 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Probably overdone it with the position size. Went as high as margin allowed it. £3 per point. On a 25 point drop in a few seconds that's £75 right there (25% of £300)

Question is now, what shall be the plan going forwards? Figure it all out on Demo first and have then another try on live? Got almost £2k of losses now over the past 1.5 years. (Thinking about it this way, I certainly spent more money on even stupider stuff than spread betting :D

 

Christ man, I lost £1400 in  WEEK!  I just happened to spread it over 4 months lol.  My biggest lost was £300 in one day over 10 trades.  I was a lunatic.

Needs a fresh approach.

Edited by nit2wynit

Share this post


Link to post

Well, it's all about how much you lose vs your net worth.

My very own Dad actually told me the other day, that he tried day- trading back in the days as well and lost £100k on it! But for him that's only a few % of his net-worth, so no big deal.
All relative :D 

 

On a side note. Ross trade recap for yesterday went exactly as I  predicted with APOP. Check it out: https://youtu.be/C8r31NF6ims 

At about minute 3.50 he says: "I started with 9000 shares, then added 6000 for the break of 4. I thought it would go right to 4.10 / 4.20." :D :D
Told you, classic Ross trade. Luckily for him, he managed to get out at 4.03. That was also a level I thought for a split second to close my trade, but then I didn't. That's the difference between a trader with little experience vs Ross with years of experience I guess.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Good news. Ross from Warrior Trading is starting over again. With a small account challenge. Starting with $500 !!!

His last small account challenge started about 3 years ago, also with around $500 and he turned it into a million $ within bit over 2 years.

Might be the perfect time to also create a small account and trade alongside him. Should be a good learning experience comparing on a daily basis what trades you took vs him, your profits vs his, etc.

Also for the doubters, like @dmedin who believe it's not even possible to grow a small account to a million - if Ross can pull it off twice within a 5 years timeframe - then everyone can do it. No doubt about it. All you need is passion for the game, concentration, resilience and the right mindset to pull it off.

I'm gonna set-up my demo account today (I'm actually out of cash - wasn't joking earlier) and will focus on US market open for the next couple of weeks. No more indices, commodities, etc. Not sure yet if I'm also gonna give UK market open another try. I guess I got to do something in the morning as well.
If I manage to grow the demo account consistently over a period of 4 weeks, then I'm gonna go back to live.

 

Who else is in giving the small account challenge a try? @nit2wynit, @dmedin, @Mercury, @Caseynotes, @TrendFollower, @elle ...

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Err, day trading?  No thanks!

His roller coaster can be smoothed out if he switches to longer term trading.  Day trading is a roller coaster, that's part of that game, especially intra-day.

He is right about his emotional pressures, it is because he is over trading (too many traders seeking to generate massive hits in one go).  He is wrong that the way to address this is to go back to a small account as he will not have addressed his underlying emotional issues and trading errors, they will emerge again if he is successful (i.e. his account grows).  In the end trading is about accumulating wealth over time not about generating a steady income.  The opportunities the markets offer are lumpy so you have to be ready to take advantage when they are offered.  A big part of trading successfully is to not trade, most of the time.

 

  • Like 1
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post

I should add, it seems like this guy has a poor money management regime in this system if he is taking too much one way exposure.  My skeptical side thinks this is a mechanism to suck in more followers, although in fairness I do not know if he has a monetisation model for his followers or not, maybe this is just his way of achieving external validation...

Share this post


Link to post
26 minutes ago, DSchenk said:

Who else is in giving the small account challenge a try? @nit2wynit, @dmedin, @Mercury, @Caseynotes, @TrendFollower, @elle ...

Ross starting over, does this mean he is going to give up all the expensive subscriptions as well? As pointed out in early Sept from vid posted on this thread Ross explains he is paying $250 a day for his direct market access platform and high speed connections which doesn't include the commissions on his trades. Anyone trying to copy may struggle to keep up.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

He mentioned he's gonna make a video shortly explaining what costs he is occurring with the small account. He obviously needs to use a different broker than his usual one, cause he needs to work around the PDT rule in the US (until his account has reached £25k). So he will need to use an offshore broker rather than a US one. 

 

Btw, just started a new thread about this: https://community.ig.com/forums/topic/7773-small-account-challenge-aka-warrior-trading-strategy/

 

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, DSchenk said:

Good news. Ross from Warrior Trading is starting over again. With a small account challenge. Starting with $500 !!!

His last small account challenge started about 3 years ago, also with around $500 and he turned it into a million $ within bit over 2 years.

Might be the perfect time to also create a small account and trade alongside him. Should be a good learning experience comparing on a daily basis what trades you took vs him, your profits vs his, etc.

Also for the doubters, like @dmedin who believe it's not even possible to grow a small account to a million - if Ross can pull it off twice within a 5 years timeframe - then everyone can do it. No doubt about it. All you need is passion for the game, concentration, resilience and the right mindset to pull it off.

I'm gonna set-up my demo account today (I'm actually out of cash - wasn't joking earlier) and will focus on US market open for the next couple of weeks. No more indices, commodities, etc. Not sure yet if I'm also gonna give UK market open another try. I guess I got to do something in the morning as well.
If I manage to grow the demo account consistently over a period of 4 weeks, then I'm gonna go back to live.

 

Who else is in giving the small account challenge a try? @nit2wynit, @dmedin, @Mercury, @Caseynotes, @TrendFollower, @elle ...

 

 

Should be fun, although it's sometimes tricky to precisely follow someone else's  day trades

Share this post


Link to post

It won't be entirely possible to trade along side as a lot of the shares he Trades aren't available to us on SB with IG.  Buuut. some of them are, so it's all to play for.

I've grown my account from £1000 to roughly £1750 trading breakouts over 1 week.  Sure it was the Demo but it's real enough to me.  I only place maybe 2 trades per day at Market Open.  If they Fail i wait till the next day.  The hardest part, as we've discovered is finding them before the bell at 2.30
Didn't trade today.  Been cooking. :D

Edited by nit2wynit
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post

@elle,

Not me.

I do not day trade unless it is a specifically strong trending asset and I think there is real value in day trading it. The only asset I have day traded in the last couple of years is Bitcoin during its bull run a couple of years ago. So it would take something trending that strongly for me to get involved in day trading. 

Edited by TrendFollower

Share this post


Link to post
On 25/10/2019 at 10:45, DSchenk said:

Good news. Ross from Warrior Trading is starting over again. With a small account challenge. Starting with $500 !!!

His last small account challenge started about 3 years ago, also with around $500 and he turned it into a million $ within bit over 2 years.

Might be the perfect time to also create a small account and trade alongside him. Should be a good learning experience comparing on a daily basis what trades you took vs him, your profits vs his, etc.

Also for the doubters, like @dmedin who believe it's not even possible to grow a small account to a million - if Ross can pull it off twice within a 5 years timeframe - then everyone can do it. No doubt about it. All you need is passion for the game, concentration, resilience and the right mindset to pull it off.

I'm gonna set-up my demo account today (I'm actually out of cash - wasn't joking earlier) and will focus on US market open for the next couple of weeks. No more indices, commodities, etc. Not sure yet if I'm also gonna give UK market open another try. I guess I got to do something in the morning as well.
If I manage to grow the demo account consistently over a period of 4 weeks, then I'm gonna go back to live.

 

Who else is in giving the small account challenge a try? @nit2wynit, @dmedin, @Mercury, @Caseynotes, @TrendFollower, @elle ...

 

 

 

 

I found his video a bit offputting where he's talking about how much money he makes and losses as if it's nothing.  I was hoping to see pure technical trading, the actual 'money shot' and not the 'fluffing'.  ;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
On 26/10/2019 at 11:07, dmedin said:

I found his video a bit offputting where he's talking about how much money he makes and losses as if it's nothing.  I was hoping to see pure technical trading, the actual 'money shot' and not the 'fluffing'.  ;)

the difference is he started with less than $600 and turned it into 1 Mil Live and proved it every day.

He'll be the first to say he doesn't win Every time.  He claims 70-80% success rate, overall.  Risking 20k on a trade and it dropping a few points is going to come with a significant loss, but only relatively.

His Transparency suggests you've got to know what you're doing, but even then, you will Definitely Lose at times.  It's a Statistical Certainty.

It's supposed to sound like it's Nothing.  It's the mastering of emotions that allows him to trade confidently. :D

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      8,088
    • Total Posts
      44,715
    • Total Members
      55,730
    Newest Member
    Nobility2020
    Joined 24/02/20 11:02
  • Posts

    • It started off with a vision to revolutionise British banking, intent on disrupting the stagnant high street banking industry by enhancing service levels and investing in state-of-the-art IT software. But now Metro Bank (MTRO) is in turmoil. Not only have five of the challenger bank’s founding directors left within the last year but the firm also pulled a £250 million bond sale citing ‘poor market conditions’, despite offering a yield of 7.5%. As a result, Metro Bank’s share price has tumbled -90% since floating at 2000 pence per share in 2016. The table below shows that Metro Bank’s share price has been the fifth most volatile amongst shares in the FTSE All-Share Index, which captures 98% of the UK’s market capitalisation. Figure 1. Top ten most volatile UK shares over the 360 days Equity 360-Day Volatility (%) 1. Indivior PLC (INDV) 140.795 2. Tullow Oil PLC (TLW) 123.499 3. Kier Group PLC (KIE) 104.882 4. Sirius Minerals PLC (SXX) 99.478 5. Metro Bank PLC (MTRO) 97.377 6. Intu Properties PLC (INTU) 92.466 7. Amigo Holdings PLC (AMGO) 86.754 8. NMC Health PLC (NMC) 81.446 9. Ted Baker PLC (TED) 80.78 10. Allied Minds PLC (ALM) 79.991 Source: Bloomberg, February 2020 If at first you don't succeed, try, try again Failing to secure funding in September last year was a huge blow to Metro Bank as it needed to raise finance to meet the Minimum Requirements for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) regulation by January 2020. MREL intends to ensure firms have the capacity to take on losses so that they can fail safely, removing the need for public funding. The bank went back to the market in October with an enhanced offer: that they would remove Vernon Hill, the chairman of Metro Bank, and a higher coupon of 9.5%. Metro Bank managed to secure the £350 million it required, but at a large cost. An accounting scandal revealed in January last year was another reason why bond investors demanded such a yield. Analysts have since raised their concerns about the constraints the business faces due to the bond terms at their third quarter results, to which David Arden, chief financial officer (CFO), responded: 'I fully accept that the cost was somewhat elevated, but I think it was the right thing to do for the long term of the bank.' A recipe for disaster: rising costs and subdued growth Whilst Metro Bank has satisfied MREL regulations, for now, there are still difficult times ahead with rising operating expenses, potential fines by two regulators and, as outlined previously, substantial costs to finance their recent debt issue. The lender is still under investigation from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over its reporting scandal in January last year whereby it miscalculated loans in risk terms, consequently overstating its capital ratios. As a result, investors have been warned that Metro Bank could potentially face financial penalties which could well be 'significant'. Adding to this, the bank is also being scrutinised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) in a separate investigation. Operating costs that are higher than average in the industry is part and parcel of Metro’s business model. The bank’s core mission is to 'change the way Britain banks' by offering customers access to its branches (now 70 in total) seven days a week. It is this that creates a huge dilemma for Metro. Costs need to be reduced, even more so due to its recent bond issue, but equally the bank must stick to its promise that made customers switch over to them in the first place. In conjunction with this, the firm needs to grow in order to return to profitability which in itself is a significant challenge in the current low interest rate environment. To achieve growth Metro Bank will need to battle on two fronts, against the 'big four' on the high street and the influx of new wave digital banks online. The graph below illustrates the consequence of Metro’s strategy. It displays the cost to income ratio, a measure commonly used to compare banks, for Metro Bank and the FTSE All-share Banks Index (Ex-Metro). We can see that Metro’s higher operating cost base has consistently resulted in a greater cost to income ratio than the average of its peers. Having said this, Metro Bank has recognised the need to focus on cost efficiency and has managed to reduce this ratio in Q3 2019. Encouragingly, the improvement occurred despite adding three new stores during the quarter as well as developing further sites in Liverpool and Manchester – the firm is sticking to its core mission. Figure 2. Cost to Income Ratio: Metro Bank vs FTSE All-Share Banks (Ex-Metro) Source: Bloomberg, February 2020. Virgin Money and Close Brothers Group have been omitted from Index average due to insufficient data Potential for a short squeeze? The market is not optimistic that the challenger bank can turn its fortunes around. Currently, Metro Bank is the sixth most shorted stock in the UK of all short positions that have been disclosed under short selling regulations set out by the FCA, with Premier Oil PLC (PMO) topping the list(1). Note, the requirement to publicly disclose short holdings is when the position concerned equates to 0.5% of total shares outstanding. Still, this is a good indication as to how popular a share is to short. The combined position of the six funds that have reported a short position in Metro equates to -9.59% of total shares outstanding, after Voleon Capital Management recently registered its bet on the company share price to fall on 17 February 2020. It comes after well-known hedge funds Odey and ENA added to their short positions at the start of 2020, with both having had short exposure for over a year. Figure 3. Disclosed short positions in Metro Bank Fund Shares outstanding (%) Reported date 1. ENA Investment Capital LLP -3.22% 05/02/2020 2. Odey Asset Management LLP -2.62% 14/01/2020 3. Marshall Wace LLP -1.38% 29/01/2020 4. Connor Clark & Lunn Investment Management -1.22% 05/09/2019 5. Voleon Capital Management LP -0.62% 17/02/2020 6. Samlyn Capital LLC -0.53% 05/06/2019 Source: Bloomberg, February 2020 Metro Bank 2020 results preview Since listing in March 2016, we have seen a steady decline in the percentage of analysts whom have issued a buy recommendation. The chart below depicts this, as well as the sharp decline in Metro Bank’s share price. The most recent consensus indicates a twelve-month target price of 232.33 pence, calculated from fourteen different analysts. Its share price closed at 205.2 pence on 20 February 2020. Source: Bloomberg, IG, February 2020 Rumours have been circulating since last year, after its reporting miscalculation, that Metro Bank was considered as a takeover target for several large private equity firms. The Financial Times reported at least six takeover firms contemplated whether it would make economic sense to buyout the bank(2). One analyst at Metro’s Q3 results posed this question directly to the leadership team to which they didn’t give anything away but did outline 'should something occur, we will treat it with the right respect because that's the fiduciary duty of the board'. An update on plans to balance growth and cost efficiency will be communicated during its full year results on the 25th February 2020. You can invest in any of the shares mentioned in this article with IG from as little as £3, our newly reduced fee, on the IG share dealing platform. Open a share dealing account. You can open an IG account within a few minutes. Fund your account. Our minimum deposit is £250. Place your first trade. Open our platform and trade over 10,000 shares available through IG. 1. ShortTracker 2. Financial Times This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
    • The FTSE 100 is tanking like a MOFO 😱
×
×