Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Increase in funding costs

Recommended Posts

I can't see a thread related to this issue. Maybe I was dreaming it, but I think I have seen sight of some funding changes put through by IG. It may not have attracted much attention.

Basically, in a nutshell, my understanding is that if you were trading US500 say in Sterling, any overnight positions would incur a cost of the Sterling Base rate plus IG's premium of 2.5%. I think that makes 3.25% per annum.

Now, I believe it says that you will be charged on that security at the "relevant interbank rate". Not the currency you are trading in but the domicile of the security. So US500 would bear the cost of the Fed rate 2.75% I think plus the IG premium of 2.5% making 5.25%. Or something like that.

Happy to be corrected on this understanding but that is pretty material if you are a position or swing trader and could, if one does not change one's method of trading lead to an increase in the % of traders who will lose money going forward.

I'm not sure of the justification re this. It is certainly an innovative move by IG versus the other spreadbet providers.

I would be interested to hear from others on this. Happy to be proven wrong on this or whether it be confirmed by IG posters?

Share this post


Link to post
Guest Nalle puh

Short only

You get paid for short position?

 

ūüėĀ

Share this post


Link to post
Guest Alexio

Yep I've just noticed this. (shows how much attention I pay to what I'm being charged) 

Since early Feb, overnight charges on long s&p500 have essentially doubled for me. I've looked at the email they sent round early Feb about changes in margin and there's absolutely no mention of them now calculating it on the dollar base rate rather than the pound. 

Despite them claiming "transparent fees" I think they were hoping no one would notice. Essentially it is highway robbery. 

I will be opening an account with another provider this morning and they can kiss goodbye to all the fees I was paying. 

Share this post


Link to post

Hi Alexio,  I don't have the original email but see the pic below of a thread where Justinian posted a copy of the email sent detailing the change in the calc for overnight funding.

image.thumb.png.dde030860b8bccc9005a843525cb6869.png

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,424
    • Total Posts
      37,754
    • Total Members
      47,723
    Newest Member
    Smallbear
    Joined 18/09/19 20:46
  • Posts

    • Wow. Just look at the volatility. The price action is erratic to say the least. This has happened before on quite a few occasions in the past.¬† In one hour from my initial post to this post the price action has reversed. It is all about waiting for a clear signal for which direction these indices are going to go in.¬†
    • So you have to admit this S&P chart is as bullish¬†as you could get, traders¬†have¬†been waiting¬†for the Fed who haven't disappointed, have¬†refused to break lower during that wait and are¬†just staring at that ATH just a short reach away. Barring a war there seems nothing to hold back the continued march onward and upward. Daily chart;¬†
    • I think we now have the potential and it is potential shorting opportunity on Dow Jones (Wall Street), S&P 500 (US 500) and Nasdaq (US Tech 100) as well as other indices. The FTSE 100 is not looking too good in advance of Brexit. The 'daily' chart is looking rather bearish. The price action is looking bearish. However the price has not breached any of the key moving average indicators as of yet for the US 500. Hence why I am using the word potential in terms of trading opportunity. Some of the ultra aggressive traders will already be short the S&P 500 and other similar indices but if they are wrong the price does not continue downwards then they will be out quickly.¬†
×
×