Jump to content

Buy Platinum

Recommended Posts

Platinum has broken out, first target is $960 for short term traders and $1035 as a major target.

Platinum_20190419_08.27.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

@robdyson,

Well spotted. I was waiting for someone else on the IG Community to share any potential breakout and potential trend to trade in relation to Commodities. 👏

Looking at the 'daily' it seems it is making new 'Higher Highs' and new 'Higher Lows'. 

824127346_SpotPlatinum_20190419_08_50.thumb.png.976d76d36fda8983b090de26c590a04c.png

This is a bullish indicator. 

Platinum is also trading above its 20, 50, 100 and 200 DMA on the 'daily'.

1051659283_SpotPlatinum_20190419_08_52.thumb.png.e7cd74bdfe9bcecff1826f2d40936823.png

This too is a bullish indicator. 

It is trading above the dots on the Parabolic SAR which is a potential signal and a potential confirmation for a trend change. 

1866450780_SpotPlatinum_20190419_08_53.thumb.png.823edd9e5e9284ecfddf24ec2c049763.png

So there are enough positive indicators and I would expect some of the Commodity traders to have got in earlier. 

One of the things I do (not always) is place the smallest trade possible on any breakout of a trading range that crosses its 20 DMA. Then when it meets certain parameters in relation to indicators I add to the positions. So for example it crosses certain moving averages, etc. This way I build my position up with the trend and price strength. It also means I get in as early as possible. Sometimes waiting for signals may mean that most of the move is missed as it lags behind. From a risk perspective if the breakout fails to kick on and the trade goes against me then my stop loss exits me out of the trade with a small loss. Losses will be incurred so trade selection is vital to keep these to a minimum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

Nice spot. Added to watchlist.

Edited by PandaFace

Share this post


Link to post

One thing to remember is that Platinum is trading at a cheaper price than Gold. Gold and Silver have left Platinum behind since the rally started back in August of last year. It seems Platinum has had enough and wants to begin to assert some authority on the price action. 

Platinum of course has several important industrial uses. I think Platinum will try and hit the $1000 dollar area as that is an important psychological price point and these rallies love nice round numbers as a target. This is seen time and time again in Commodities. Platinum is both an industrial metal and a precious metal. 

Platinum is also known at the 'Rich Man's Gold'. This could lead to a reversal in pricing between Platinum and Gold. Platinum should be more expensive than Gold and so there could be a shift in speculative capital from Gold into Platinum. Platinum could attract extra volatility as Gold and Silver are more liquid markets. 

I do not know what will happen in the future for Platinum prices but I shall follow the price action closely.

Platinum will not follow any of my thoughts or assumptions as to what I think may happen. Platinum is not obliged to follow any of my trading strategies or plans. Platinum may not follow the path I have mapped out in my mind and nor does it have to. Platinum will do what it will do just like any other Commodity.

As a trader the key is whether I can profit from the price action or not. Prices can change like the weather and so can traders views and opinions. I know from my experience that on many occasions the price action changes my views and opinions. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. If this did not happen due to stubbornness, ego or I know best attitude then it would be worth worrying about. 

Share this post


Link to post

Platinum pulled back below the breakout level and is retesting this now. If you take into account the MA crosses in early March, the extreme in the Gold Platinum ratio, and the Palladium bubble (forcing manufacturers back to Platinum for catalytic converters) we have a good case for going long. Just needs a convincing close above 878.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Our picks

    • Post in Indices
      "UK retail sales at 9:30 and US durable goods at 1:30. Strong bear day yesterday though only Nikkei tested key support levels." Stay up to date on how the indices are moving and have your say.
    • Post in Successful strategy?
      Analysis of 43 million trades by DailyFX showed that 61% of trades are actually profitable (when looking at EURUSD specifically). Read more about that and check out their Podcast here. Have any questions? Ask away.
        • Thanks
        • Like
    • Brent Crude rally ends, time for the big Bear!
      "Looks to me like my question as to whether the the 25 April turn was a rally end or a simple retrace may have been answered as Brent price dropped hard through the supporting lower channel line.  I would like to see the recent lows broken to confirm but odds are that this market is now heading down.  Could this mean that Stocks have also topped out?"
      • 7 replies
    • Post in Dax & Dow
      What are your long term opinions on market movements? "As for the Dow above 26k lets rock and roll long. Below 25k time to get more aggressively short in my eyes."
        • Like
    • Post in US 500 - Potential Shorting Opportunity
      What's your trigger for opening a trade? Discuss with others on the Community, specifically about the US500: "I think there's a potential possibility of shorting S&P 500 brewing.  I want to wait to see if the 20 MA does drop beneath the 50 MA."
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      6,746
    • Total Posts
      31,146
    • Total Members
      40,993
    Newest Member
    John_Mac
    Joined 24/05/19 11:56
  • Posts

    • You may well be right @786Trader there are a lot of fundamentals based theories around so yours is as good as anyone's.  My hypothesis is not based on Oil fundamentals but can be summed up in 2 words: Deflationary Depression. Regarding the Dow, this attached is my long term view.  
    • @ mindthegap Did not agree with much of the  linked you tube video. Thought he was full of it to be honest. BS with a sprinkling of useful truth.  He may have been to Asia but completely failed to understand them. Foxconn make Apple devices in China because there is no way Apple could make them as well, as quick or as cheaply in the US or even Mexico. For example. So either prices go up or Apples margins go right down. Plus everyone is paying more for anything made in china, including simple items like shoes. Not inflationary at all. Ever considered China may do to Apple what Trump has done to Huawei. Trump is a bull in China's shop. And we will all have to pick up the tab.  
    • Interesting postulation. The big bear? Not quite so convinced.  For mostly obvious political reasons to do with supply and demand. Brent to $28? Not anytime soon.  WTI crude an unlikely maybe, but Brent ? I am wholly unconvinced.  The markets are not over supplied. Demand is as strong as ever. Not to mention sanctions on Iran and Venezuela. Saudi will not continue to sell oil on the cheap, even if Trump tells them to,  though the Russians will with their current batch of chlorinated crude.  A $28 Brent implies a Dow @18000 or less or vast reserves newly discovered. A market adjustment where the Dow rocks down to 20K late 2020 is a solid maybe, but oil?  Graphics tell a story, but the giant big bear has not convinced me.  Personally, I can see oil increasing through political tension and the strong possibility of actual conflict. The strait of Hormuz controls 30% of global supplies.   Support at the $68 mark is considerable.     
    • All blue though small gains;
    • @johnt4917, @nit2wynit, @dmedin, Different traders can have different strategies and still all be successful depending on how one defines success. A lot of traders define success as having more winning trades than losing trades.  My strategy incurs at times more losing trades than winning trades. However, the key measurement of how I personally define success is to ensure that the profit from my winning trades is greater than the losses on my losing trades. A consistently profitable trader could be deemed as having a successful trading strategy if this is demonstrated over many years. Some traders who consistently make higher profits than others over many years could be deemed as having a more successful trading strategy. So if for example I trade 10 times and 7 are losing trades and 3 are winning trades then that is a 70% failure rate and 30% success rate. Now some may deem this as an unsuccessful trading strategy. Now what if the profits on my 30% of winning trades were far greater than the losses on the 70% of my losing trades. If this was achieved consistently over many years then it changes the dynamic of how one thinks about a successful trading strategy.  Your personality, mind set and psychological approach to trading has a big influence on the type of trading strategy one ends up being more comfortable with and adopting. It is about finding the right trading strategy that suits you (we are all different) and then really fine tuning it to ensure it meets your trading goals and objectives. Once this is understood then one will quickly realise that there is no professional or amateur on IG Community but just traders. Some will be more experienced that others. Some will apply far more complex trading methods and conduct far more technical and challenging analysis. However, this does not mean they are more profitable or are making greater profits than those who are not.
×
×