Jump to content

George Soros is wrong on Brexit


Mercury

Recommended Posts

Forget about the Brexit angle on this article and focus on the Fundamentals argument for why GBP must be devalued.  Regardless of the result this week I firmly believe GBP is going down and this article shows is just one reason why.

 

 

You might have read George Soros’ warning in The Guardian yesterday that sterling would collapse if Britain votes to leave the EU tomorrow. 

Bernard Connolly, a highly respected analyst and a man whose experiences working at the very heart of the European Union led him to write the acclaimed and brutally honest “The Rotten Heart of Europe”, has written an exclusive response to Soros’ view for MoneyWeek. 

We wanted you to see it right away. Connolly argues that Soros has it entirely wrong – the real disaster will be if we don’t vote for Brexit tomorrow.

If you only read one thing before you vote tomorrow, make it this piece.


John Stepek

George Soros is wrong about Brexit and the pound
by Bernard Connolly


Natalie StantonGeorge Soros has at times been a very successful speculator. But in his article in yesterday's Guardian he asserted that Brexit would bring a sharp fall in sterling that would be very damaging to Britain. That suggests that he is confused about the underlying needs of the British economy – as is the Bank of England.

Soros says that unlike the obviously beneficial depreciation of sterling after “White” Wednesday in September 1992, when sterling left the ERM, a post-Brexit depreciation would cause a recession, because the Bank of England has virtually no room to cut interest rates and because Britain has a large current–account deficit. But the reality is that Britain, in the EU or out of it, has a severely unbalanced economy in which, because of abnormally low interest rates, far too much spending has been brought forward from the future. Britain is not alone in that – it is a problem faced by many economies. But the huge current-account deficit (7% of GDP – an all-time record) is an indication that the problem is significantly worse in Britain than elsewhere.



That deficit cannot run on forever. It is not financed by “the kindness of strangers”, as Mark Carney notoriously claimed, but by the greed and folly of markets. It is quite simply inevitable that at some point markets will realise that Britain's external position is unsustainable. Britain is living beyond its means, in part because of the wholly illusory perception of “wealth” created by inflated house prices – in turn the result of aberrantly-low interest rates which are distorting the economy and creating a looming crisis for pension funds and life insurers.

The increase in British “living standards”, relative to underlying productivity growth, simply has to decline for a time. Britain needs higher interest rates, lower house prices and a weaker currency. That truth is undoubtedly unpalatable. But burying our heads in the sand, as Soros – and, irresponsibly, the Bank of England – seems to want to do, would only make things worse. The longer it takes for that recognition to take hold, the more disruptive will be an eventual “sudden stop” in the financing of the deficit, the bigger will be the sterling depreciation required to support output and employment in the face of reduced domestic demand (in the economics jargon, this comes mainly from switching demand from internationally-traded goods, mainly produced abroad, to non-traded goods, produced and sold only at home – a mechanism Soros seems not to have grasped) and the greater will be the risk of financial crisis.

The most serious risk of all for the British economy is that if the opportunity for political escape and economic re-balancing afforded by Brexit is not taken, market recognition of unsustainability will come in the context of the inevitable next phase of the euro crisis, or of a global financial crisis. There are only three things the EU does not like about British financial markets: they are British; they are to do with finance; and they are markets. EU officials at all levels have made it clear that in a crisis, London, the biggest financial centre and the hub of trading in the euro, would be the focus of their concern and that the British economy and the British financial sector would be sacrificed to protect the euro area. It is even likely that the EU, relying on Article 140 of the treaty, would seek to force the British government to resist a sterling depreciation which would “distort the Single Market”. In such circumstances, Britain would be forced to choose between a Greek-style depression (and ruining bank depositors via the EU bail–in rules) and emergency exit from the EU in far more contentious and recriminatory circumstances than in the present.

This is not a happy message. We might wish we were not starting from here. But if the opportunity of Brexit is not taken, Britain will suffer far more pain in the future – probably a near future.

All this is about economics. The argument for lancing the economic boil is compelling enough. But the political and constitutional arguments for Brexit are even more compelling. It is perplexing that Soros, whose family survived the house-to-house destruction in the Battle of Budapest between the tank armies of two totalitarian powers, should be so enamoured of the new totalitarianism incarnated in the European Union, with its European Gendarmerie Force and its plans for a multinational army – as JS Mill described such armies, “the executioners of liberty throughout modern history”.

Bernard Connolly
Money Morning

 

 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      16,008
    • Total Posts
      76,721
    • Total Members
      63,932
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Pranay
    Joined 19/09/21 01:18
  • Posts

    • @Caseynotesthanks for the reply. How do I know if I am trading at DMA platform or any other.       
    • Hi, all brokers are market makers to some extent. If you are trading on the Direct Market Access (DMA) platform then you are dealing on the exchange through IG but if using any other platform then IG looks to match those trades inhouse matching shorts to longs. Any excess they hedge on the exchange themselves.  So IG aren't taking the other side of your trade, they are covered whether you win or lose and they make on the spread from both parties. If they need to hedge they still win because they get a better spread than what they pass on to you.  
    • Err, I've had all my real vaccines, the ones that completed safety trials, have also had special vaxxes when had to present proof when travelling to a country were there were dangerous diseases present, no problem. But experimental gene therapy that has no medium or long term risk data for a disease that, according to the FDA, has just a 1 in 250,000 risk, and needing to present proof to go to a restaurant or club in my home town - no, this is not about a virus.   Note that the FDA officials that the Biden admin pressured into giving early FDA approval for these vaxxes both resigned. FDA panel just voted 16-3 AGAINST approving the boosters This slide was shown at their meeting.  
×
×
  • Create New...