Jump to content

Trade Planning and Testing

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

The problem is the vids are all mixed up so you will need to sort through and pick them out.

Just realised the first vid is an overview of daily routine, the second vid lists the conditions for taking trades which is also the list of names of the videos relating to them, the number 2 is the video called Baselines.

Share this post


Link to post

image.thumb.png.9c06840b6734911aaf00422ff339b905.png

@dmedin, don't beat yourself up, you should try trading¬†properly for a change and see how that goes ūüôĄ. Let me explain, but first a couple of points. A short while back I was looking at a¬†chart you¬†posted and¬†the structure and all 5 indicators you had on were screaming 'bullish' so you happily jumped in short. I think you're missing a trick, if you're going to completely ignore all your indicators don't have just 5, have 10! That will make it look like you know what you are doing and earn you lots of¬† kudos points, but don't ever have no indicators because then people will just suppose you don't know anything¬†ūüėČ

2nd point is that trading reversals needs a special set of skills that you don't currently have, so just don't.

So that leaves just pullbacks and breakouts in trends, there is nothing else, buy the dip or the breakout.

So how to?

1/

a/ 2 time frames correlating, your trading chart and a higher time frame chart both trending in the same direction.

2/

a/ On your trading chart find a pullback of roughly 40 - 60% of an impulse move.

b/ Wait for the pullback to die and the bars to change back to the trend colour and so signal trend continuation.

c/ Aim to buy at that point or wait for a breakout passed the previous high.

Now the indicators. There must be a reason for them and they must give a go or no signal, a red or green light, nothing else, no perhaps or maybes.

3/

a/ An indicator to confirm what your eyes are telling you about the trend. This could be a simple moving average with settings tuned to your chart time frame. Sloping up = long entries only.

b/ An indicator to confirm what your eyes are telling you that the pullback is dying. I like to use Stochastic with settings tuned to the chart time frame to be starting on an upward curve for a long entry. Some use volume colour reversal or an RSI direction reversal.

c/ 1 or 2 overall confirmation indicators, these tend to be mid-range oscillators on default settings that signal whether bulls or bears are in control, I use to use Vortex but am trialing Aroon with Chaikin Money Flow. Aroon must have the green line on top for a long entry and CMF must be above zero.

The important point of these last 2 indicators are that they are there to filter out a lot of the maybes so you are left with fewer entry signals but they are of a higher probability.

So you see the setup on the chart. You look to the indicators and if you have all 4 showing green lights (MA, Stoch, Aroon and CMF) you automatically enter .

You know your system works because you have validated it. You collected the stats when you backtested it on 20 trades, then forward tested it on demo for 20 trades and then forward tested it live with smallest position size for 20 trades.

Of course you need to tack on some trade exit and money management rules but that's easy, the entries are the hard part, get them right and you are more than halfway there.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

"It's not so much that consistently profitable traders have an uncanny ability to predict price movement, rather it's the fact that they deal with uncertainty in a methodical and consistent way. Therein lies their strength."

@TradingComposur

image.png.9cf182cee3a8db2c05abf01fc54e82ad.png

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post

Another free excel trade journal download  link here (see the 2012 update, includes column chart insert); 

https://www.earnforex.com/blog/advanced-forex-trade-journal/

download zip, open the excel file, click 'File' > save as > right click on file > Attributes > uncheck 'Read Only' > rename and save.

 

see the original journal's description here;

https://www.earnforex.com/blog/organize-your-forex-trading-with-trade-journal/

Share this post


Link to post

Good little vid from Rayner Teo looking at the differences, pros and cons of Day Trading, Swing Trading, Position Trading and Transition Trading.

 

Share this post


Link to post
On 31/12/2019 at 12:07, Caseynotes said:

Good little vid from Rayner Teo looking at the differences, pros and cons of Day Trading, Swing Trading, Position Trading and Transition Trading.

 

Hi Caseynotes. Rayner is cool, I¬īve been following it for last 9 months. It helped a lot...I also recommend Karen Foo who deal with topics quite behind the scenes. It may take some vids to get used with her accent...

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post

Interesting video on reviewing your journal and so therefore shows the benefits of journaling in the first place. Demonstrates identifying problems early and taking steps to correct them before they damage your account.

It uses the Edgewonk journal which is a paid for journal, I'm not pushing edgewonk but rather pushing the advantages of using journals and what a time saver they really are.

There are 2 basic free journals linked in this thread if you have a look through, anything is better than nothing.

 

Share this post


Link to post

"Came across a discussion on 'edge' or 'expectancy' that was moderated by a 'guru'. Chatter was all entries, patterns, stop losses, targets etc. That's not 'edge' or 'expectancy'. Edge is mathematical. How often you win and how much you win when you win. Below is mine for 2020"

The Chartist.

image.png.c5898f985eecc33a91f50a4793cb8238.png

Share this post


Link to post

The most important bits are blacked out?  Who cares if someone makes a good ratio if they've been demo trading or made pennies ... bearing in mind there's an S&P 500 ETF over there that will build you solid returns if you hold it for 5+ years and do absolutely nothing

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, dmedin said:

The most important bits are blacked out?  Who cares if someone makes a good ratio if they've been demo trading or made pennies ... bearing in mind there's an S&P 500 ETF over there that will build you solid returns if you hold it for 5+ years and do absolutely nothing

they are not the important bits at all and to think so shows a clear misunderstanding of what's important and what's not. a win rate with a risk/reward ratio that  plots on the profitable side of the graph is ALL you are searching for, once you have that you have it all.

image.png.a541f7eed3b109656252de72ffa6b3a8.png

 

Edited by Caseynotes
  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post

1494760393_WinRate1.png.580ace1e2fcf0844e2ac2641a93311aa.png

So given the above here is a very good video (20 min, published just a few days ago) on what are the important things you need to know/do to avoid losing, and no it has nothing to do with trendlines, Fib, MACD or whatever.

1/ See the big picture, know what's ahead.

2/ Timing and execution are important, the big picture warns a possible trade is materialising. Getting in too early or too late will kill you.

3/ Manage the trade with care.

4/ Have a process.

5/ Stick to the process. 

Share this post


Link to post
15h
 

I was in the S&P pit surrounded by successful traders & lost nothing but $$ trying to be like other traders. When I stepped back, took what I learned & created my own strategy...I became profitable. Don’t copy someone else’s strategy & make it yours, make your strategy your own.

Share this post


Link to post

A lot has been poured into this thread so about time to boil it up, render it down and pull out the bare bones to see just how simple the process actually is.


On the first page we saw how to define ourselves, what we want, what we have the time to do, our personality and what we are most interested in. We then match that with types of trading and time frames.


So for example you decide you don't have the time to day trade but like the idea of swing trading, you are interested in commodities but note that the average stop loss below the swing low on the daily chart  equals £x which is a bit too rich for you but on the H4 chart is only £x which is ok for your account size.


So you decide to swing trade commodities on the H4 chart. Simple.


Next the strategy. You want to swing trade which means buying dips in an uptrend (or selling rallies in a downtrend). So you will need an indicator to show trend plus a confirmation and you will need a entry trigger and confirmation.


An indicator on it's own is worthless. What you need is a combination of indicators that will signal an entry and filter out more losing trades than winning trades. This is crucial, let it sink in. 


You don't need a 99% win rate or the 'best' trades or the longest running trades. You just need an entry trigger and filter out more losers than winners.


So what might that look like (made up example); 


A/ Trend indicator: an upward sloping MA and MACD above zero to confirm.
B/ Buy dip entry indicator: Heikin Ashi candles change from pullback red to trend colour white and a RSI bounce up off around 50 to confirm.


Well that was simple but now we need to phase 1 test it and that's a simple eyeball backtest of 20 trades so scroll your H4 chart right back then start looking for entries going forward. For testing purposes bolt on a standard risk management of a target of 2x the stop, this can be modified later if the system works.


How long did that all take, a couple of hours? But deciding on what type of trader you want to be only needs to be done once, the system build and phase 1 test took probably less than an hour.


For a Reward of 2 for a risk of 1 (the stop loss) the chart in the post above tells us we need a win rate of at least 35% to be profitable. If the system didn't achieve this on backtest was it close enough to try to modify or do we need to start anew?


Once we have found a simple system that is profitable on backtesting now there is a problem, if you are only getting a couple of trades a week phase 2 testing on demo will take time because you want a reasonable sample size of 20 odd trades, grin and bear it or consider trying a simulator. 
Once completing phase 2 if your system survives this far you are ready for phase 3 testing which is on a live account with minimum size.


Additional considerations; 
Higher Time Frame - look for trade entries in context with the HTF charts, don't look to trend trade if the HTF is consolidating or about to hit key resistance. Or if the HTF shows any resistance has been beaten and this is the first pullback then think go full throttle. 


In the example above a swing trader is looking to buy the swing low and sell the swing high rather than just take 1:2 risk reward, the point is that for testing the set 1:2 is good enough.


Finally, so all in all not as difficult as it all sounded at the beginning, but can this really be enough? If the system is validated then yes, it is enough.


Built it, Validate it, Do it.
 

Share this post


Link to post

Oh right.  All it takes is to build a validated system.  Simple enough then :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
17 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Oh right.  All it takes is to build a validated system.  Simple enough then :D

 

keep shooting from the hip til you run out of bullets is the only alternative. will you ever get 'lucky' doing that? no.

Share this post


Link to post

I've been working on how to find a system that 'works'.  To that end I've been studying TA as time allows.  I've tested a few systems out extensively and not a single one of them works reliably, although charts always make sense AFTER the fact.

So, I feel like telling someone to build a system that works is pretty much about as good as telling them to buy a lottery ticket - maybe the odds of winning the jackpot are even higher.

You know the real reason there are so many 'indicators' and 'patterns' in TA?  Because they are all EQUALLY USELESS :D

Share this post


Link to post

 

1 hour ago, dmedin said:

You know the real reason there are so many 'indicators' and 'patterns' in TA?  Because they are all EQUALLY USELESS :D

oh look, that example system in the post just above that I completely made up on the spot would have given 3/3 winning trades on the current gold chart.

image.thumb.png.d46e5502de16e67f7bf21bfc6769d260.png

I keep saying forget TA, it's only a guide and there's not much you need to know, only price action on appropriate chart structure can trigger a trade. You've been posting for a year and I've no idea how you trade, I think the reason for that is neither do you.

Try reading and following the thread instead of wandering around doing your own thing. Decide on one time frame and on one market which to apply one entry type. Then look at building your own simple system specifically for that. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post

5 trading strategies from Tradeciety, It's new, published just a few days ago, I've not seen this yet but these guys are pretty good so likely worth a watch.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
7 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

5 trading strategies from Tradeciety, It's new, published just a few days ago, I've not seen this yet but these guys are pretty good so likely worth a watch.

 

 

 

That's a nice whirlwind tour of some of the more effective TA techniques.

 

Share this post


Link to post

This is pretty much 'on point'.

"When someone states that moving averages or TA "don't work" they show their limitations, because the signal alone is not the system. Position sizing, trade management & money management are what determine the success of the system, not the signal. Random entry test confirms."

Larry Tentarelli @LMT978

image.png.c1e0e22b8cfdae3b5608e2552eddf8fa.png

Share this post


Link to post

Position sizing is actually the easy bit.  If TA doesn't really work then you have no hope, and it will be death by a thousand cuts.  It might even be better to blow it all in one go as this saves you from a slow miserable death.

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post
19 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Position sizing is actually the easy bit.  If TA doesn't really work then you have no hope, and it will be death by a thousand cuts.  It might even be better to blow it all in one go as this saves you from a slow miserable death.

once again you deliberately miss the point and that is that the plan must make a whole and complete system, each component is worthless on it's own, refusal to make a plan is something you've steadfastly held onto all this time instead preferring to complain that nothing works. you must be getting bored by now.

  • Thought provoking 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      8,088
    • Total Posts
      44,717
    • Total Members
      55,732
    Newest Member
    Nobility2020
    Joined 24/02/20 11:02
  • Posts

    • Still nothing, even on mobile¬†
    • Off topic related to Caseynotes previous post. http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/videos.html ¬† October 2019...is Johnson&Johnson a firm buy?ūü§Ēūü§Ē
    • It started off with a vision to revolutionise British banking, intent on disrupting the stagnant high street banking industry by enhancing service levels and investing in state-of-the-art IT software. But now Metro Bank (MTRO) is in turmoil. Not only have five of the challenger bank‚Äôs founding directors left within the last year but the firm also pulled a ¬£250 million bond sale citing ‚Äėpoor market conditions‚Äô, despite offering a yield of 7.5%. As a result, Metro Bank‚Äôs share price has tumbled -90% since floating at 2000 pence per share in 2016. The table below shows that Metro Bank‚Äôs share price has been the fifth most volatile amongst shares in the FTSE All-Share Index, which captures 98% of the UK‚Äôs market capitalisation. Figure 1. Top ten most volatile UK shares over the 360 days Equity 360-Day Volatility (%) 1. Indivior PLC (INDV) 140.795 2. Tullow Oil PLC (TLW) 123.499 3. Kier Group PLC (KIE) 104.882 4. Sirius Minerals PLC (SXX) 99.478 5. Metro Bank PLC (MTRO) 97.377 6. Intu Properties PLC (INTU) 92.466 7. Amigo Holdings PLC (AMGO) 86.754 8. NMC Health PLC (NMC) 81.446 9. Ted Baker PLC (TED) 80.78 10. Allied Minds PLC (ALM) 79.991 Source: Bloomberg, February 2020 If at first you don't succeed, try, try again Failing to secure funding in September last year was a huge blow to Metro Bank as it needed to raise finance to meet the Minimum Requirements for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) regulation by January 2020. MREL intends to ensure firms have the capacity to take on losses so that they can fail safely, removing the need for public funding. The bank went back to the market in October with an enhanced offer: that they would remove Vernon Hill, the chairman of Metro Bank, and a higher coupon of 9.5%. Metro Bank managed to secure the ¬£350 million it required, but at a large cost. An accounting scandal revealed in January last year was another reason why bond investors demanded such a yield. Analysts have since raised their concerns about the constraints the business faces due to the bond terms at their third quarter results, to which David Arden, chief financial officer (CFO), responded: 'I fully accept that the cost was somewhat elevated, but I think it was the right thing to do for the long term of the bank.' A recipe for disaster: rising costs and subdued growth Whilst Metro Bank has satisfied MREL regulations, for now, there are still difficult times ahead with rising operating expenses, potential fines by two regulators and, as outlined previously, substantial costs to finance their recent debt issue. The lender is still under investigation from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over its reporting scandal in January last year whereby it miscalculated loans in risk terms, consequently overstating its capital ratios. As a result, investors have been warned that Metro Bank could potentially face financial penalties which could well be 'significant'. Adding to this, the bank is also being scrutinised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) in a separate investigation. Operating costs that are higher than average in the industry is part and parcel of Metro‚Äôs business model. The bank‚Äôs core mission is to 'change the way Britain banks' by offering customers access to its branches (now 70 in total) seven days a week. It is this that creates a huge dilemma for Metro. Costs need to be reduced, even more so due to its recent bond issue, but equally the bank must stick to its promise that made customers switch over to them in the first place. In conjunction with this, the firm needs to grow in order to return to profitability which in itself is a significant challenge in the current low interest rate environment. To achieve growth Metro Bank will need to battle on two fronts, against the 'big four' on the high street and the influx of new wave digital banks online. The graph below illustrates the consequence of Metro‚Äôs strategy. It displays the cost to income ratio, a measure commonly used to compare banks, for Metro Bank and the FTSE All-share Banks Index (Ex-Metro). We can see that Metro‚Äôs higher operating cost base has consistently resulted in a greater cost to income ratio than the average of its peers. Having said this, Metro Bank has recognised the need to focus on cost efficiency and has managed to reduce this ratio in Q3 2019. Encouragingly, the improvement occurred despite adding three new stores during the quarter as well as developing further sites in Liverpool and Manchester ‚Äď the firm is sticking to its core mission. Figure 2. Cost to Income Ratio: Metro Bank vs FTSE All-Share Banks (Ex-Metro) Source: Bloomberg, February 2020. Virgin Money and Close Brothers Group have been omitted from Index average due to insufficient data Potential for a short squeeze? The market is not optimistic that the challenger bank can turn its fortunes around. Currently, Metro Bank is the sixth most shorted stock in the UK of all short positions that have been disclosed under short selling regulations set out by the FCA, with Premier Oil PLC (PMO) topping the list(1).¬†Note, the requirement to publicly disclose short holdings is when the position concerned equates to 0.5% of total shares outstanding. Still, this is a good indication as to how popular a share is to short. The combined position of the six funds that have reported a short position in Metro equates to -9.59% of total shares outstanding, after Voleon Capital Management recently registered its bet on the company share price to fall on 17 February 2020. It comes after well-known hedge funds Odey and ENA added to their short positions at the start of 2020, with both having had short exposure for over a year. Figure 3.¬†Disclosed short positions in Metro Bank Fund Shares outstanding (%) Reported date 1. ENA Investment Capital LLP -3.22% 05/02/2020 2. Odey Asset Management LLP -2.62% 14/01/2020 3. Marshall Wace LLP -1.38% 29/01/2020 4. Connor Clark & Lunn Investment Management -1.22% 05/09/2019 5. Voleon Capital Management LP -0.62% 17/02/2020 6. Samlyn Capital LLC -0.53% 05/06/2019 Source: Bloomberg, February 2020 Metro Bank 2020 results preview Since listing in March 2016, we have seen a steady decline in the percentage of analysts whom have issued a buy recommendation. The chart below depicts this, as well as the sharp decline in Metro Bank‚Äôs share price. The most recent consensus indicates a twelve-month target price of 232.33 pence, calculated from fourteen different analysts. Its share price closed at 205.2 pence on 20 February 2020. Source: Bloomberg, IG, February 2020 Rumours have been circulating since last year, after its reporting miscalculation, that Metro Bank was considered as a takeover target for several large private equity firms. The Financial Times reported at least six takeover firms contemplated whether it would make economic sense to buyout the bank(2).¬†One analyst at Metro‚Äôs Q3 results posed this question directly to the leadership team to which they didn‚Äôt give anything away but did outline 'should something occur, we will treat it with the right respect because that's the fiduciary duty of the board'. An update on plans to balance growth and cost efficiency will be communicated during its full year results on the 25th February 2020. You can invest in any of the shares mentioned in this article with IG from as little as ¬£3, our newly reduced fee, on the IG share dealing platform. Open a share dealing account. You can open an IG account within a few minutes. Fund your account. Our minimum deposit is ¬£250. Place your first trade. Open our platform and trade over 10,000 shares available through IG. 1.¬†ShortTracker 2.¬†Financial Times This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full¬†non-independent research disclaimer¬†and¬†quarterly summary.
×
×