Jump to content

British American Tobacco

Recommended Posts

Looks like it is in a 2+ year down channel and a potential candidate for shorting, now below the 200 day / 40 week SMA.

BATS-Weekly.thumb.png.c935a20ed0b2325c41f2e4330ca9e90a.png

  • Like 2
  • Thought provoking 1

Share this post


Link to post

I'll be updating regularly on this one too as I committed :D

Share this post


Link to post

Wasn't one of my best ideas!  I got stopped out today.  Will still keep an eye on it and see where it goes from here.  It still seems to be in a downtrend.

BATS-Daily.thumb.png.ca478b3f1541cd22a2bf83376e9b418f.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Wasn't one of my best ideas!  I got stopped out today.  Will still keep an eye on it and see where it goes from here.  It still seems to be in a downtrend.

Not sure what your trigger for entry was but at a glance it looks like a case of getting in late. This can happen when you are trying to look at too many charts and keen to get a trade on. 

Always spot where the First Trouble Area is and check it's not so close to the entry point that you have no lee way if things go wrong and you run straight into another pullback. The prior low for a short is the FTA and if the reversal to continue the trend entry has been missed then as price passes the FTA is a second opportunity to get in short (a breakout entry). 

image.thumb.png.09fbf295a72fc94164fd38613bf7a678.png

image.png.ee2ae7fd64baa876c3bc8683558d97b8.png

  • Like 1
  • Thought provoking 1

Share this post


Link to post

Thanks for posting this @dmedin, I hadn't been paying much attention to the sectors on the FTSE of late, being more focused on the US large Caps.  Given the strongly Bearish turn of events on Tobacco, note Imperial Tobacco (now called Imperial Brands in a vain effort to eliminate the word Tobacco...) is showing a very similar (even more Bearish perhaps) set up, I decide to analyse it out.  My results are as follows and may go some way to explaining why your Short idea failed this time.

The Monthly Chart shows the progression on this stock nicely since the beginning of a long Bull move since 2000 that barely blinked during the major corrections on wider indices.  This move is in a classic 1-5 (purple) with another 1-5 (pink) on the final wave to the top.  The Central Bank bubble rally since 2009 is encompassed within an expanding triangle, a signal of over exuberance.  At the top there was clear and strong NMD on the Weekly and Daily to signal the turn.  Then the first drop (1-2 purple) broke, and had a failed retest of, a weekly chart ending channel (blue lines on weekly chart).  This retest, which took its sweet time, finally capitulated and the market ran quickly down to a Pennant formation (pink line triangle) that occurred with an initial failed breakout of the lower expanding channel line.  When the Pennant failed the expanding channel line also quickly failed and led to a sharp drop.  This was stopped by a long term supporting trend line after a push through the Monthly Fib 50% and the market closed above this level and is now, it seems, in a retrace rally (not a continuation of the Bearish move).  Note the Pennant often signals the halfway point in a move and so it was here.  An extrapolation from the Pennant gets to around where the market bottomed out in what I think is either a wave A or 3.  We should now get a wave B or 4 (i.e. a rally).

If you look at the Daily chart you will see significant PMD at the wave 3rA turn point followed by a 1-5 rally up to what looks like a wave A (NMD on that turn), the first leg of the retrace rally.  IF wave B is done, and it might yet run down for a lower low, then a projection of equivalence (i.e. wave A = Wave C in length) gets us to about the Fib 50% and the previous breakout zone from the expanding channel.  At present I would anticipate a sharp 1-5 rally up to this area, around about £36 followed by a final phase Bearish drop.  Whether this is an A-B-C or 1-5 on the big picture chart remains to be seen.

So net I would not look to short this market until a suitable retrace rally turn is identified.  However with a large part of the Bearish move done there are surely better Shorting options about?  The one thing that interests me with this though is the apparent change of strategy of fund managers, who were crazy for these high divi yielding stocks in the recent past.  Could this be a precursor of things to come more widely?    

 

BATS-Monthly_010719.thumb.png.7e9599c36f0c3776c0f94ee80761567e.pngBATS-Weekly_010719.thumb.png.ea0c0e1fe9fa8500a25d5f8df74de843.pngBATS-Daily_010719.thumb.png.f6d1da13582abaa8fc442dd2a599451d.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

This now actually looks like a potential for going long.

BATS-Daily.thumb.png.30753f887d5057c522e10d3dd56a0b52.pngBATS-Weekly.thumb.png.3ebd791aa1b8d5aeba041a8a4c801302.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

A break above the wave 1 high (3020) would confirm the move with a target of about 3600 initially then assess price action and indicators for a turn and reversal or breakthrough.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

@Mercury

 

Does my pathetic attempt at wave numbering make any sense?  Could BATS.L be about to decline again?

BATS-Weekly.thumb.png.55293c6fe2d994b24cd0b004176d2370.png

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, dmedin said:

Does my pathetic attempt at wave numbering make any sense?  Could BATS.L be about to decline again?

I don't know but I do know that historically BATS has been the most bullish trend I ever saw so I wouldn't sell this one so low in it's history.  👿

 

BATS-Daily.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

@dmedin, your A-B-C doesn't really stack.  Typically the wave C ends beyond the wave A.  Although I have seen some deep EWT users label a retrace as you have, I have generally ignored this because it seems like force fitting via exception to me (I am not that deep into EWT truth be told).  If a set up doesn't conform to the standard modes I tend to simply wait for further information in the form of price action and look at other markets, there are many many more options out there after all.

If I look at BAT now, and please be advised that I do not look at individual shares much anymore so this is just a cursory look, I do not see any change from my previous detailed post above.  Therefore the A-B-C (pink - weekly chart) is still on.

You may recall that I wasn't sure whether the wave B (pink) was done or not (2 placements).  When I saw a slightly higher high on the Daily I though maybe it was done and the retrace rally was on.  However now that the market has moved back down there are 2 scenarios present for me as follows (see daily chart):

  1. the current bearish move is just a natural zig zag within a wave C that will carry on up in due course
  2. the whole move off the wave A (pink) is not yet concluded but is tracing a so-called complex retrace that is made up of a series of whip saw A-B-Cs and the recent top is a wave B (red).  If that so we can expect a wave C to conclude with a lower low, maybe around the Fib 62% support zone. (and note there is a small A-B-C (blue) within the current move that fits better).

Wave Bs are tricky moves to trade, I tend to try and avoid then until an obvious conclusion (turning point) and seek to catch the wave C OR just leave it alone until the retrace is done and catch the bigger next move down (in this case) because after a retrace, or counter trend move, comes a return of the motive wave (in this case down).  There are surely better opportunities (and safer) elsewhere than trading this set up at this time.  Even if you were minded to catch the retrace, say at £36, wouldn't there be bigger opportunities elsewhere?  Seems like the bulk of the move down on BAT and similar sector companies is done now.

I agree with @Foxy that I would not Short BAT as a retrace is on but I have different reasons I think.  Check out my monthly chart on my first post for my long term view, which is also unchanged.  I believe we have seen the top on this sector now, and this is a significant change in the stock market as a whole, in terms of money managers seeking high yielding stocks that are engaged in significant buybacks.  Obviously this strategy is no longer working for tobacco companies and the reality of declining markets and the inevitability of vaping regulation is taking its toll.  So after a retrace I expect a break of that LT trend line and a drop to the end of the Bear.  Meanwhile the momentum stocks in the rest of the indices will keel over and join the early movers heading down.  In terms of sector we also have property under pressure, most stocks on the FTSE didn't recover from the credit crunch and are now heading down for the final leg, similar to tobacco.  Also, critically, Retail is under pressure with many companies in this sector having apparently topped out.

Question for you Dmedin, have you assessed all the sectors to see where the best opportunities are?  If I was still trading individual shares I would be focusing on sectors that are about to top out, or recently may have, to get Short early.  Once a sector or share has made a major turn and moved significantly (in the case of tobacco over 50% decline) it is too late to join as the risk of significant retrace is to great and there are likely better opportunities elsewhere.  Of course your trading methodology needs to be geared to identifying and entering turning points as opposed to trend following, where you wait until the trend is well bedded in.  BTW, a long term swing trader will deploy both of these methodologies so for me it isn't about 1 or the other it is about using the right method at the right time.  So second question, do you have a methodology that is designed to deliver against your treading strategy?  These are rhetorical questions of course, for you to think about rather than answer.  EWT is useful for both swing trading and trend following but the most critical thing is being clear on your overall strategy and picking the right vehicles to execute that strategy.

BATS-Weekly_130719.thumb.png.723214ea46c0cf4ef95401e37810d2e6.pngBATS-Daily_130719.thumb.png.791f686c57bc5f04951e128571c359da.png

Share this post


Link to post

@dmedin, your A-B-C doesn't really stack.  Typically the wave C ends beyond the wave A.  Although I have seen some deep EWT users label a retrace as you have, I have generally ignored this because it seems like force fitting via exception to me (I am not that deep into EWT truth be told).  If a set up doesn't conform to the standard modes I tend to simply wait for further information in the form of price action and look at other markets, there are many many more options out there after all.

If I look at BAT now, and please be advised that I do not look at individual shares much anymore so this is just a cursory look, I do not see any change from my previous detailed post above.  Therefore the A-B-C (pink - weekly chart) is still on.

You may recall that I wasn't sure whether the wave B (pink) was done or not (2 placements).  When I saw a slightly higher high on the Daily I though maybe it was done and the retrace rally was on.  However now that the market has moved back down there are 2 scenarios present for me as follows (see daily chart):

  1. the current bearish move is just a natural zig zag within a wave C that will carry on up in due course
  2. the whole move off the wave A (pink) is not yet concluded but is tracing a so-called complex retrace that is made up of a series of whip saw A-B-Cs and the recent top is a wave B (red).  If that so we can expect a wave C to conclude with a lower low, maybe around the Fib 62% support zone. (and note there is a small A-B-C (blue) within the current move that fits better).

Wave Bs are tricky moves to trade, I tend to try and avoid then until an obvious conclusion (turning point) and seek to catch the wave C OR just leave it alone until the retrace is done and catch the bigger next move down (in this case) because after a retrace, or counter trend move, comes a return of the motive wave (in this case down).  There are surely better opportunities (and safer) elsewhere than trading this set up at this time.  Even if you were minded to catch the retrace, say at £36, wouldn't there be bigger opportunities elsewhere?  Seems like the bulk of the move down on BAT and similar sector companies is done now.

I agree with @Foxy that I would not Short BAT as a retrace is on but I have different reasons I think.  Check out my monthly chart on my first post for my long term view, which is also unchanged.  I believe we have seen the top on this sector now, and this is a significant change in the stock market as a whole, in terms of money managers seeking high yielding stocks that are engaged in significant buybacks.  Obviously this strategy is no longer working for tobacco companies and the reality of declining markets and the inevitability of vaping regulation is taking its toll.  So after a retrace I expect a break of that LT trend line and a drop to the end of the Bear.  Meanwhile the momentum stocks in the rest of the indices will keel over and join the early movers heading down.  In terms of sector we also have property under pressure, most stocks on the FTSE didn't recover from the credit crunch and are now heading down for the final leg, similar to tobacco.  Also, critically, Retail is under pressure with many companies in this sector having apparently topped out.

Question for you Dmedin, have you assessed all the sectors to see where the best opportunities are?  If I was still trading individual shares I would be focusing on sectors that are about to top out, or recently may have, to get Short early.  Once a sector or share has made a major turn and moved significantly (in the case of tobacco over 50% decline) it is too late to join as the risk of significant retrace is to great and there are likely better opportunities elsewhere.  Of course your trading methodology needs to be geared to identifying and entering turning points as opposed to trend following, where you wait until the trend is well bedded in.  BTW, a long term swing trader will deploy both of these methodologies so for me it isn't about 1 or the other it is about using the right method at the right time.  So second question, do you have a methodology that is designed to deliver against your treading strategy?  These are rhetorical questions of course, for you to think about rather than answer.  EWT is useful for both swing trading and trend following but the most critical thing is being clear on your overall strategy and picking the right vehicles to execute that strategy.

BATS-Weekly_130719.thumb.png.723214ea46c0cf4ef95401e37810d2e6.pngBATS-Daily_130719.thumb.png.791f686c57bc5f04951e128571c359da.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

@Mercury

Is it easier to trade indices over individual stocks?

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post

I haven't done systematic sector analysis.  I have been trading opportunistically.  To be perfectly honest, I haven't found a reliably profitable way to trade yet and if I am going to get into detailed sector analysis I might as well become a fundamentalist and try to get a full time job doing that as a living instead of trading off my own account.  That seems to be what all successful people do anyway.

Share this post


Link to post

LOL @dmedin I feel you.  However if you are interested in trading individual stocks and are not considering what the sector or indeed the whole index is doing then how do you decide if the individual stock is going up or down?  Or put more pointedly where in the cycle is the stock you are interested in?  If you are not using a technical analysis technique to do this (line EWT) then you have to look at fundamentals.  Personally I prefer to do both.  I do not think intrinsic value is a good basis for trading, investing maybe but it doesn't matter what the intrinsic value of a particular stock is in a market crash, everything goes down...

Regarding your question about individual stocks vs the indices, that would seem to be a good topic for specific thread, if you would care to start one.  I am sure there are many different opinions on the forum that may be beneficial to hear.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 01/07/2019 at 15:10, Mercury said:

Thanks for posting this @dmedin, I hadn't been paying much attention to the sectors on the FTSE of late

@Mercury

Can you still trade sectors on IG, I can find them in the listings?

Share this post


Link to post
12 hours ago, Foxy said:

@Mercury

Can you still trade sectors on IG, I can find them in the listings?

Yes, on the old platform the are listed in neat order in a subgroup of Indices. On the new platform they are just chucked into the indices group.

sec1.PNG.cdacd18f0ba0fe9d4a4ffdebd4bcc264.PNG

image.thumb.png.cd959e93e75ed8560f18a03ae86bc0ba.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

Yes, on the old platform the are listed in neat order in a subgroup of Indices. On the new platform they are just chucked into the indices group.

@Caseynotes

Thanks for that, I've been looking for a sub heading for sectors, I feel a bit daft now. 👿

Share this post


Link to post
17 hours ago, Foxy said:

@Caseynotes

Thanks for that, I've been looking for a sub heading for sectors, I feel a bit daft now. 👿

no worries, couldn't find them myself but remembered them on the old platform so started searching there. The new platform could do with some filing subsets to make searching easier.

Share this post


Link to post

You got your answer @Foxy, my only issue with these sector indices is I am not sure what is in them.  I assume there are FTSE not a global group?  Allshare or FTSE100?  I only trade the whole index and only use sector analysis to assess what may be going on in the overall index.  Without knowing what the make up is I can't do that so I made my own from the FTSE100.  As an example, I would expect Hammerson plc to be in the REIT sector but all of their income comes from retail (the own and run shopping centres).  So I have Hammerson in both my property and retail sector groupings.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Looks like the problem with BATS is that it is too chopping on the HTF with swings too wide for a small punter to be able to get it right and/or afford the stops, R/R.  Probably need to have a long term fundamental position or be following short term momentum.  As said elsewhere if you look at the chart and you don't see the trade, stay away  from it.  If you are looking at it and trying to guess the direction, stay away from it.  There are so many instruments out there it is pointless being married to the ones that wreck your head.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,249
    • Total Posts
      35,924
    • Total Members
      45,926
    Newest Member
    Ericdewettheo
    Joined 20/08/19 01:10
  • Posts

    • Thank you JamesIG for your explanation of how IG determine their price charts. "This means there will always be a discrepancy with the highly publicized index price" ... Yes that is also noted but your company "interpretation" has the low 9 days before the other outlets. However you want to spin (explain) it. That makes it incredibly difficult to ascertain what a real low is.....is it the one you show or the one the others show? It also, at least to me, appears that best practise would be served if the resulting price chart reflects the index it purports to follow/promote. EWT users ( I follow a US analyst) will know the frustration. His DOW chart shows a different low....and therefore a different count. Tongue in cheek.....so when was the recent low in the past two weeks?
×
×