Jump to content
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

OrderSend error #131 invalid trade volume

Question

Hello,

I am seeing this error all the time when attempting to back test in MT4 with EVERY EA I can find. My lot size doesn't matter, tried a percentage of account, I tried every lot size I could before giving up, 1.0, .1,.2,.3 etc.... I messed with max slippage from 3 to 6, not sure that even matters, but what is the deal with MT4 and back testing?  I do have a live account but still not trading because I can't back test my system.

Any help would be awesome, thanks in advance!

WCJoker

Share this post


Link to post

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
3 minutes ago, wcjoker said:

I am a new US client so it may have something to do with a kink in the system, I know IG is still working all these things out, but who knows.

I hope you are right, I don't recall anyone posting a similar 131 error message problem before on the forum, I'd also send the helpdesk an email if you haven't already done to request tech staff look into the problem.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
11 minutes ago, wcjoker said:

Hello,

I am seeing this error all the time when attempting to back test in MT4 with EVERY EA I can find. My lot size doesn't matter, tried a percentage of account, I tried every lot size I could before giving up, 1.0, .1,.2,.3 etc.... I messed with max slippage from 3 to 6, not sure that even matters, but what is the deal with MT4 and back testing?  I do have a live account but still not trading because I can't back test my system.

Any help would be awesome, thanks in advance!

WCJoker

Hi, have a look at this page;

https://www.earnforex.com/blog/handling-ordersend-error-131-in-metatrader-4/

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
1 minute ago, Caseynotes said:

Hi,

Thanks for the response, I have already visited and tried this, here were my results

 

2019.07.12 08:55:01.811    2019.03.14 15:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,H1: 0
2019.07.12 08:55:01.811    2019.03.14 15:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,H1: 0
2019.07.12 08:55:01.811    2019.03.14 15:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,H1: 0
2019.07.12 08:55:01.811    2019.03.14 15:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,H1: 100000


doesn't seem good

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

It's the same on all time frames:

2019.07.12 08:58:18.687    2018.05.13 22:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,Daily: 0
2019.07.12 08:58:18.687    2018.05.13 22:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,Daily: 0
2019.07.12 08:58:18.687    2018.05.13 22:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,Daily: 0
2019.07.12 08:58:18.687    2018.05.13 22:00:00  CCI Level EA CADCHF,Daily: 100000

 

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

I am a new US client so it may have something to do with a kink in the system, I know IG is still working all these things out, but who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Just now, Caseynotes said:

I hope you are right, I don't recall anyone posting a similar 131 error message problem before on the forum, I'd also send the helpdesk an email if you haven't already done to request tech staff look into the problem.

Good idea, I will pester them, thank you Caseynotes.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,259
    • Total Posts
      36,008
    • Total Members
      46,032
    Newest Member
    Stonesfield1
    Joined 21/08/19 07:18
  • Posts

    • Mercury, of course, how you label your wave counts is entirely up to you. Corrective waves (according to EWT) are in the following form: ZigZags, Flats (Regular & Expanded) & Triangles. Complicated corrections are usually a combination. A common one is a double Zig-Zag. Triangles can often found in wave 4 or B but never wave 2. Motive waves are usually pretty simple to spot even for a novice. The problem always occur with corrections in my experience. Knowing the substructure count is critical in that respect. ZigZag (5-3-5), Flat (3-3-5), Triangle (3-3-3-3-3). There is often an alternative count (although one will always be preferred) and only subsequent price action reveals which is correct. There are a few rules, but really not many, and some guidelines. With respect Mercury there is no rule nor guideline that I have ever seen that says "the move does not penetrate above the previous high" for a corrective wave!! For those that don't have the time nor inclination you can subscribe to various services. In the hands of an expert, when combined with Fibonacci ratios, trend lines and sentiment indicators it is, IMHO, a powerful tool. 
    • Actually I thought Corrigan was pretty good and pretty much spot on in his general take on a multitude of economic topics, there was no political agenda and of course it was his view so to get balance -er, find someone else with a different econ view?
    • Good piece on copper here from CME focusing on it's strong links with the Chinese economy and the very low current implied volatility. "Copper closely tracks growth in China, yet copper options prices tend to be closely related to U.S. monetary policy. How will Fed rate cuts impact the metal? " https://www.cmegroup.com/education/featured-reports/coppers-options-paradox.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social_post&utm_campaign=economic_research&utm_content=20190618_hp
×
×