Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Indices Relationship With Members (Components)

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

I have been trading indices for nearly 2 years, while I find them very difficult to understand at times, they could be smooth and easy at other times. I usually trade candlesticks combined with volume, bollinger bands and moving averages and considering how the members  shares are going.

What I can't understand is that components are massively in the red in bulk, however the index in question is rallying with no hesitation whatsoever. Take Japan for example, members were 98% in the red, but the actual index rallied 280pts since the market opened.

Can someone explain this to me please?

Share this post


Link to post

The best example I heard to explain this is the following... "Think of it as a whole load of people on one side of the boat. It doesn't take much for it to flick over." If sentiment is that extreme (in this case short) then a small movement up will take out the very close stops which then all become buys and then the next level of stops are taken out which become buys etc. Result is a very rapid move in the opposite direction. Often seen at turning points.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,881
    • Total Posts
      41,781
    • Total Members
      52,047
    Newest Member
    ysiphamthingocngan
    Joined 16/12/19 12:51
  • Posts

    • I think that was in reference to the different strategies as in a mean reversion system with smaller targets needs more trades than a trend following system that is longer term.
    • 'Trading only 50 times a year limits your P&L' 'Trading 500 times a year lets you exploit your edge' Pretty much goes against all professional wisdom on the subject of trading.  'The more you trade, the more you lose.'
    • Just listened to the Jack Schwagger podcast.  Typical BS: Stick to the rules and be disciplined! Except when it stops working - then change the rules! Know the market!  Limit your losses!  Analyse every trade - that will help prevent you losing!  But everyone loses throughout their career!  It's all about losing less frequently!  Blah blah blah ... In other words, 'To hell with this ... I'm going to get rich by writing a book instead'
×
×