Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Sirius Minerals could be handed Government lifeline for cashflow problems

Recommended Posts

BoJo the Clown wants to use taxpayer money to bail out private investors?

How very 'free market' of him.

Share this post


Link to post
On 05/09/2019 at 13:45, dmedin said:

BoJo the Clown wants to use taxpayer money to bail out private investors?

The 'talk' of the government bailing out Sirius is just wishful thinking.

TeesideLive: Sirius Minerals 'may offer investor incentive' to solve cashflow problems

Buy bonds and receive free warrants which will convertible to shares.

DOI:  I'm short Sirius at 10.404.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

From Financial times before market open today:

image.png

 

This is not advice just news. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Ah yes, to be an 'insider' with that information to hand before it is released publicly.

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, dmedin said:

Ah yes, to be an 'insider' with that information to hand before it is released publicly.

The information was released before market open today, as soon as the auction period ended you can see that price movement. It's dropped a little but still up from market close yesterday: 

image.png

But the question is, will this continue to rise off the back of the news or was this a short lived bull movement?

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, CharlotteIG said:

The information was released before market open today, as soon as the auction period ended you can see that price movement

 

From what I've seen such huge gaps are permanent and never get filled (most recently example was when Red Hat shares skyrocketed after the company got acquired by IBM), but retail traders never get to enjoy the big gains after the news is released.  Fortunate are those who were holding long positions overnight though :D

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, dmedin said:

 

From what I've seen such huge gaps are permanent and never get filled (most recently example was when Red Hat shares skyrocketed after the company got acquired by IBM), but retail traders never get to enjoy the big gains after the news is released.  Fortunate are those who were holding long positions overnight though :D

This is true. When trying to buy this morning, due to the large amount of buy orders and limited sell orders, you more than likely wouldn't have been getting last nights close :( 

  • Thought provoking 1

Share this post


Link to post
24 minutes ago, dmedin said:

 

From what I've seen such huge gaps are permanent and never get filled (most recently example was when Red Hat shares skyrocketed after the company got acquired by IBM), but retail traders never get to enjoy the big gains after the news is released.  Fortunate are those who were holding long positions overnight though :D

...unless AAL pull their offer

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Jeremy Naylor has done a short piece this morning speaking about the potential deal and what it can mean for Sirius Minerals: 

If you have Twitter, you can find the piece there. 

Alternatively, click here.

We also have a news and analysis piece with the video included. Sirius Minerals share price soars after Anglo American weighs £386 million rescue deal.

Share this post


Link to post

From 20th January:

Investegate: Recommended cash acquisition for Sirius Minerals

This part caught my eye.

Quote

The Acquisition shall be put to Sirius Shareholders at the Court Meeting and at the General Meeting. In order to become Effective, the Scheme must be approved by a majority in number of the Sirius Shareholders voting at the Court Meeting, either in person or by proxy, representing at least 75 per cent. in value of the Sirius Shares voted. In addition, a special resolution implementing the Scheme must be passed by Sirius Shareholders representing at least 75 per cent. of votes cast at the General Meeting.

Sirius supposedly has a large number of small private investors.  On other discussion forums there are some very vocal and angry shareholders who say that they are going to vote against the acquisition in the belief that a better offer is forthcoming.

I'm wondering whether more than 25% of shareholders will vote against the acquisition.   If that happens then I think Sirius will go into liquidation.  I'm considering another short just before the meeting.

Share this post


Link to post

It appears that a few institutional investors are buying Sirius shares, so much so that they've bid the share price above Anglo American's offer price.  Presumably these institutional investors are bondholders who want to be sure the vote for the takeover goes through and liquidation is avoided.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

You're very brave for going anywhere near it.

Share this post


Link to post

The share price is now below Anglo American’s bid price of 5.5p. This looks like an opportunity for bondholders to buy below the bid price, vote yes and even make a small profit on the share price.

If anyone's interested, here is the part of the Scheme Document regarding the shareholders' vote:

Quote

As detailed further in the Scheme Document, in order to become effective, the Scheme requires, among other things, that a majority in number of the Scheme Shareholders present and voting (and entitled to vote) either in person or by proxy, representing not less than 75 per cent. in value of the Scheme Shares held by such Scheme Shareholders, vote in favour of the Scheme at the Court Meeting, and that the requisite majority of Sirius Shareholders approve the Scheme Resolution at the General Meeting. The Scheme is also subject to the satisfaction or (where applicable) waiver of the Conditions and further terms set out in the Scheme Document.

Notices convening the Court Meeting and the General Meeting, to be held at Honourable Artillery Company, Armoury House, City Road, London, EC1Y 2BQ, on 3 March 2020, are set out in the Scheme Document. The Court Meeting is scheduled to commence at 11.00 a.m. and the General Meeting is scheduled to commence at 11.15 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the Court Meeting is concluded or adjourned).

 

Share this post


Link to post
On 07/02/2020 at 13:51, dmedin said:

You're very brave for going anywhere near it.

Looking at another share dealing forum there seem to be quite a few very vocal Sirius shareholders who want to vote no to the Anglo American bid but are too stupid to work out how to vote.  I'm thinking carefully about that short.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

I think the no-voting private investors will mess up at the Court Meeting.  I’m long at 5.19.

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

The vote went through and Sirius receives another mention in today’s FT Alphaville (registration but not subscription required).

Looking at another share dealing forum there seem to be some Sirius shareholders who gambled far more than they could afford to lose.

Edited by wjw22
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,772
    • Total Posts
      65,571
    • Total Members
      86,350
    Newest Member
    AdamKavan
    Joined 22/10/20 23:20
  • Posts

    • https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/when-performance-matters%3A-nasdaq-100-vs.-sp-500-second-quarter-20-2020-07-13 should look similar with GICS - i.e. NDX underweight (vs SPX)to Financials (incl. RE), Energy, Materials and Utilities together roughly 25%... and those went kinda nowhere over the more or less recent past...:     ...of course this is rather superficial, but (together with comparisons posted earlier) suggests really exactly two - closely linked - segments in global asset markets have been trending (up) recent years:  US large cap tech and consumer (incl. Healthcare) stocks.   ...apparently a significant share of all the money printed globally this period  seems to eventually somehow have found its way into these highly concentrated segments...
    • I know relative to some brokers (who are taking the absolute $%&*) IG fx conversion fee of 0.5% is okay, however its still an absolute joke that they and the industry can get away with this flagrant ripping off of customers. I would like to know if IG have any plans to reduce their conversion fee ( trading US stocks in an ISA) to compete with others such as Trading212 who don't charge fx fees at all.... I have a moderate account with substantial turnover, like others I know, I'm now considering transferring my account to 212 as I cant see any justification for such high fx conversion fees now its been shown thats its possible to remove them al together... Perhaps 0.1% to cover costs would be understandable, but 0.5% so 1% round trip on trading any size is ridiculous. I easily give IG thousands, if not tens of thousands a yr in fx fees...
    • Hey,  Unfortunately in Singapore we don't offer a non-leveraged account. We offer these types of accounts to other clients in other countries but not for Singapore.   Apologies for the inconvenience. 
×
×