Jump to content
  • 0

How do I stop the 'Please add funds to your account" emails

Question

The way I trade, I receive about 15-30  'please add funds to your account' and 'please add funds urgently' on a daily basis.  I don't need these warnings and I would rather stop receiving them.  How can I control that other than blocking IG from my email account (which I don't want to do)?

Share this post


Link to post

24 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

@backwardation,

What trading strategy do you possibly use that means you get 15-30 of these messages every single day!

If you ignore such messages then it most probably means you have insufficient trading capital to cover your margin requirements on those trades. It means IG can close those positions resulting in a loss of capital for you.

Capital destruction is one of the biggest enemies for a trader.

Now it may be that you have a trading style which I have not considered and it may be hugely effective. Are you able to articulate how the way you trade leads to you 15-30 of these messages daily?

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Can you configure your Outlook to auto send it to Trash

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Thank you.  I didn't think of that.  In outlook inbox rules you can control actions based on the subject.  Here are the two rules I added that will hopefully fix my issue.

929228071_ScreenShot2019-09-18at9_10_14AM.thumb.png.e9194f07133833affebf5a7741f28004.png

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

@TrendFollowerIts a max leverage (2%) gambling/trading style for CL, without stops.  I normally blow the account a couple of times a week.  I always start from a $300 deposit and I withdraw 30% above $1000.  I've had huge success and spectacular losses.  Yesterday for example my account started the day at $187, ended the day at $2,300 (and I did blow the account during the day as well from about $1400 down to $380).  Today that can more than double, or I might end the day with $48.  I quantify my risk, in that I never fund my account more than I withdraw.  Overall its profitable strategy for me, but I've lost tens of thousands over the years to finally hammer out the kinks. 

Basically I'm a gambler that got better at it.  All I use in my 'strategy' are Bollinger Bands (13 periods) in 1, 3, and 30 min timeframe. 

Edited by backwardation

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

I am interested to know more. $187 to $2300 yesterday, how many trades did you take and on which pairs? How many pips did you aim for each trade?

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Yesterday I tool 43 trades all in CL (USOIL).  My strategy it to go 'all in' when the bar closes and a new one opens outside the BB13 on 1 min.  About 40% of the time this is too early an entry and my account is down 15-30% until it clips the 3 min BB13.  For big massive moves like yesterday and Sunday I also use 30min BB13.  Note than when price clips the Bollinger there is usually a pullback and a retest of the area it clipped, so you get to play the move twice in both directions.  This is a very costly strategy, so only play with 'free' money you have already made.  I don't place any take profits or stops.  I watch the Bollinger and wait for the pullback to exit a position on the other end of the 'price rotation' (think like a zigzag indicator, but I don't use it on screen).  Also when trading CL you have to have a scrolling twitter client open on your desktop like Tweetdeck with only important sqwuak services and trump in the feed.

There is a veteran pit trader I know who uses a similar strategy, but only on 1min and 3min, and he adds things like true strength index to his systems.  He posts his trades realtime on twitter.  He made $9,000 yesterday in pit session only.  @jimb2468 on twitter.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

I must add and emphasize that this is probably not a good strategy for most people and will teach you extremely bad habits, and would really only work on a crazy volatile instrument like CL (possible GC and YM).  Please don't lose your money because of what I wrote here, I don't need bad Karma.  YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
41 minutes ago, backwardation said:

I must add and emphasize that this is probably not a good strategy for most people and will teach you extremely bad habits, and would really only work on a crazy volatile instrument like CL (possible GC and YM).  Please don't lose your money because of what I wrote here, I don't need bad Karma.  YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Hi, sounds great, especially with the wild moves just lately, which platform are you using out of curiosity, I remember we were talking about the DMA platform a few months back.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Guest phil

unsure if you are serious or just trolling everyone?

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

DMA didn't help at all with futures.  I was hoping it would have a price ladder for futures but unfortunately it doesn't.  I execute on ProRealTime (using the scapling trade book window, the tiniest one, which I overlay on top always visible), but I watch the charts on SierraChart ($36/month).  I started using Sierra a couple of months ago to get volume information and volume profile.  I realized it didn't help my strategy, but its such a nice platform so I kept it for the bollingers.  They look much sharper on their hollow candles.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
4 minutes ago, Guest phil said:

unsure if you are serious or just trolling everyone?

Not trolling, and definitely not advising anyone to use this strategy.  I just needed to know how to stop receiving emails.  Have a good day.

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Thanks for the sharing. I have never had much success with BB so I will pass. But good to hear you have something that works for you. I asked because I am always interested to learn from other traders. Thank you again

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

@tehka BB alone won't work for most real traders because the MAE (maximum adverse excursion) is very high for most sane people.  It takes a certain type of numbness to make it work, and only with an instrument where blowing 70% of your account can be made up  relatively quickly in a few trades.  It also doesn't work with the mindset of an account grower.  You have to keep withdrawing all the time before account blows.

 

@guestphil I must add that yesterday was a particularly volatile day (probably one of the top 10 volatile days in CL history), so yesterday's results are not typical.  Having said that my 'strategy' is profitable for me (touch wood and sprinkle salt and all the other good stuff).

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

I regret posting this.  People are DM'ing me thinking I'm trying to sell them something.  I realized that most people probably don't understand the leverage already built into the CL contract (1000 barrels).  So here's an example from yesterday:

This trade took 11 mins.  If your account had a tiny $150 balance and you took this trade with 1pound contract (margin $147), you would have made $315.  

Conversely, being on the wrong side of this will rip your face off. 

A more tropical trade involves 30-40 points, and you get so many of those during pit session.

 

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Guest Trader Joe

I used to trade crude in a similar way using different indicators. It’s not for the faint hearted. I’ve made and lost thousands in a day. I would withdraw everything at the end of the week, until I realized Wednesday was usually my worst day. I’m a bit of a quantitative trader and I use stats with my system.  Once I started withdrawing On Tuesday’s my system became profitable. Something changed in the beginning of the year and my system became consistently a loser with crude. Now I just trade stocks, and the volatility can exceed crude on many days. 

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

@guesttraderjoe the ironic thing is my system got more profitable since start of the year.  I think the big tightening wedge CL has been in all year might have something to do with that.  I could never trade stocks, because my ability to screen is consistently worse than random selection (which is an achievement on its own).  Have a wonderful profitable day!

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Guest phil

I'm sorry I don't want to be a pain, but I've seen a ton of BS online from people claiming crazy things.  If you are trading today can you post a screenshot of your results?  I really want this to be true.

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Fair enough, although all I wanted to do was mute an email, I'm now on the defensive.

Here's today so far.  I've withdrawn most of my account yesterday and I've turned $539 into $1141.10. thats more than double only during this morning (Dubai time).  And pit session hasn't even started.  This is where most profits are made.  You forced me to brag, so yeah I'M **** GOOD.  Although to be honest you are right to be doubtful, tons of BS out there.  Only difference is I'm not trying to sell you anything and I'm telling you my way takes a lot of losses to learn.

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-09-18 at 2.20.32 PM.png

notice my position size increasing to the max I possible can with my leverage with each trade.  That on CL is the secret sauce if you are good and have the psychology to withstand huge MAEs. Probably can be used with other scalping systems, not just my BB.

Edited by backwardation
said more things

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Oh no, You are creating a wrong expectation for new traders. Hope this don't cause many to blow their accounts thinking they can duplicate this over and over again. There will be some good days and many blown accounts.

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

As you have pointed out, most should not be doing this at all. All it takes is that one big, long FU candle and...

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

As you have pointed out, most should not be doing this at all. All it takes is that one big, long FU candle and...

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

@tehka yes absolutely this isn't a strategy for new traders, or even good traders.  Its a variation of reverse double martingale which is a betting strategy.  After 7 years of trading this method is what worked for me best, once I learned to control risk while still not using stops.  I used to let my accounts grow, only to see a 17k  account crushed to almost 0 in a matter of minutes.

Edited by backwardation

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Guest Brad F.
On 18/09/2019 at 15:39, backwardation said:

The way I trade, I receive about 15-30  'please add funds to your account' and 'please add funds urgently' on a daily basis.  I don't need these warnings and I would rather stop receiving them.  How can I control that other than blocking IG from my email account (which I don't want to do)?

I think it helps if you change from losing trades to winning ones :)

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
On 18/09/2019 at 15:39, backwardation said:

The way I trade, I receive about 15-30  'please add funds to your account' and 'please add funds urgently' on a daily basis.  I don't need these warnings and I would rather stop receiving them.  How can I control that other than blocking IG from my email account (which I don't want to do)?

Try making less losing trades and more winning ones :)

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,620
    • Total Posts
      39,070
    • Total Members
      49,233
    Newest Member
    alexserfu
    Joined 17/10/19 17:13
  • Posts

    • Hi everyone,  so, those of you following my FTSE - Daily Trades thread may know, I'm looking for new strategies to tackle the market. Was starting to think about this today and made a few thoughts. First one I came up with in the process is the following and utilises 'Andrew's Pitchfork' a rather odd name for a simple principle.   Thought Process I was going back to the basics and starting to think about the fundamentals of trading: Buy low and sell high. Or go short high, and buy back low later. So the key of my new strategy has to somewhat depended on these fundamental trading principles. Next I was thinking, looking at a chart, in what region can the price considered to be "low" and in what region would I consider it to be "high". I was looking at a 5min chart and looking at the whole day. I was drawing one line at the low of day, one line at the high of day, those are obviously the extremes where everyone can agree prices are low / high. Then I draw a line right in the middle between the two, where the price is neither high nor low. Then I draw a line at 25% and one at 75% and said, if the price is between the low of day (0%) and 25%, I consider the price to be low. If the price is between 75% and high of day (100%) I consider the price to be high. In between (25%-75%), it's neither high nor low. If I'd somehow manage to always buy in the low range and sell in the high range (or go short vice versa), then this could be a decent strategy. The next problem I was facing is, I've done this analysis on the previous day, where we know high and low of day. How can this strategy work out for future price movements, where high and low of day are unknown. Andrew's Pitchfork This is where the Pitchfork comes in. The assumption I'm making is that if I extrapolate the 4 required levels (low of day, high of day, 25% and 75%) from the previous day to the following day, the strategy still works. This is because more often than not, prices move up and down around a certain level, without breaking away from it and moving onto the next level. (This obviously has to be proven with data - more to that later) The way the pitchfork works is exactly how the 4 required levels are drawn up. The pitchfork is defined over 3 points: High, Low and Mid-point. It then draws 5 levels on the chart: High (100%), 75%, Mid (50%), 25%, Low (0%) So how does it work The way I imagine it to work is the following: 1) Identify previous day's high and low 2) Draw the pitchfork in the chart with aligning its high and lows on the daily high and low. The mid point is exactly in the middle of daily high and low. This draws a horizontal pitchfork in the chart. 3) When the price of the asset falls below 25%, place a buy stop order at the 25% level. Once the price rises again and breaks through that level, the order gets executed. (vice versa with shorting above the 75% level) 4) Stop Loss is right below (size of the spread) the low of the pitchfork. Target is somewhere above 50%-75%. You have at least a 1:1 risk-to-reward ratio. Need to calculate target level by asset based on historic patterns. Does it work? Don't know yet. So far I've manually painted a few of those pitchforks in the chart for the past couple of days on FTSE100, NASDAQ, CL and NG and it seems it works more often than it doesn't. Cases where it clearly doesn't work is when there's a strong move to either direction, aka price breaks-out and moves to a different level than it was the day before. Interestingly when this happens, the strategy wouldn't necessarily always result in a loss, but sometimes the entry conditions would never be triggered in the first place. E.g. if we start the day already in the high region (above 75%) and then never fall below it - no order triggered on that day. On the negative side, huge breakout opportunities are missed with this strategy, so worth looking into a complementary strategy which works specifically for break-outs. Next steps Next, I'm trying to backtest the strategy. Will need to pull a whole lot of data and analyse. Hope to have that done over the weekend. Will update the thread accordingly. Data I'm trying to get: Win ratio, Where's the optimum take profit level, Time of day where this usually plays out (my idea is to hook this in with the ATR analysis I've done and trade this pattern at times of high ATR, aka FTSE, DAX in the morning, NASDAQ, NG, CL in the afternoon)  First success First successful example trade taken this afternoon on CL. You see nicely how the pitchfork is drawn on the chart and is derived by the high and low of the previous day. At 14.30 today the price dipped below the 25% level. I set the buy stop order at the 25% level, which got triggered at 14.35. The price afterwards makes a sweep move up to the 50% level, where my limit sell order gets triggered at 15.15. It would've been possible to play it up until the 75% level, but wanted to be safe, without having the data yet. Could've been luck - who knows.   What do you think of this approach?        
    • just to add to bigdeal's reply SBs can be either cash/daily funded bet or futures/forward which have a separate chart accessed from the dropdown box next to the chart title. for cash/dfb there is no expiry but you paid an overnight interest fee, this charge does not apply to futures/forwards which have a larger spread instead. see pic.
    • https://www.home.saxo/insights/content-hub/articles/2019/10/17/emerging-market-stocks-just-break-out-of-a-20-month-downtrend
×
×