Jump to content

'Gutwrenching': How the dream of a Sirius Minerals goldrush became a nightmare for investors

Recommended Posts

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/gutwrenching-how-dream-sirius-minerals-16988585

Quote

 

Pat Earnshaw ploughed all his cash into the world's largest fertiliser mine - and watched his holding soar by as much as £2,000 some days.

But the "Sirius dream" quickly turned into a "gut-wrenching" nightmare for him and thousands of other small-time investors.

Sirius Minerals'  share price went into freefall on September 17, after the firm pulling a £400m fundraising attempt for its world-leading mine project.

It has left a financial black hole way bigger than the one they're digging just south of Whitby.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Huh?  He put ALL of his savings into one stock?

Share this post


Link to post
Guest longterm

This share is for the long term, many financial and engineering hurdles to overcome until they can remove the Poly4 from the ground and sell world wide. 5-10 years until full production is achieved  

Share this post


Link to post

I closed my short at 4.38.  Sirius will almost certainly be in administration within the next six months but it has a history of staggering on for much longer than might be expected.  The share price also spikes occasionally, which I think may be local investors doubling down.  Sirius' shares are now unborrowable.

Share this post


Link to post
Quote

 

there are the 85,000 retail shareholders, some of whom live close to the mine site in North Yorkshire and had invested in a bid to boost the fortunes of the local economy.

...

While the bulletin boards have been filled with tales of woe, some on the market will be rubbing their hands with glee at Sirius’ plunge.

One such character will be hedge fund billionaire and America’s 45th richest man Kenneth Griffin,

...

... Anna Turley, the Labour MP for nearby Redcar, who in a statement following the news branded the government’s refusal to step in as an “absolute disgrace” as the project would provide 1,200 jobs across Teeside and North Yorkshire.

Turley also lambasted the government’s Northern Powerhouse strategy, which aims to boost economic growth in Northern England, saying its commitment to the proposal was “ringing hollow” in the wake of Sirius’ troubles.

 

 

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/902964/losers-and-winners-of-the-sirius-minerals-saga-902964.html

Those affected are not Tory voters (people in the north of England) so they won't get any help from London.

 

Share this post


Link to post

“Go and speak to a professional, otherwise it is gambling”, Fraser said,

Did they seek professional advice before investing their entire pension pot on a single stock :P

Share this post


Link to post
Quote

 

Chris Fraser, chief executive, said the Financial Conduct Authority should investigate the bulletin boards where many Sirius retail shareholders discuss their investments.

The Sirius chief said it was “deeply concerning” that regulators did not address the forums where people were “holding themselves out as experts and giving investment advice”, describing it as “real Wild West stuff”.

“They have these people sitting in their basements in their sweatpants, giving them investment advice — unregulated, unlicensed and people follow them,” he said.

The most prominent online share forums are the London South East and ADVFN forums. Investors post hundreds of messages a day, sharing details of their share…

 

Who's sat here reading this in their basement in their "sweatpants" ROFL!! 😂😂

Share this post


Link to post

Another quote I find incredulous is that Chris believes that when the company’s stock fell 10% the day before the $500 million bond offering failed, “that this might have been triggered by a post on an online forum that falsely claimed it was about to announce an equity-raising”.
 

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,629
    • Total Posts
      39,148
    • Total Members
      49,326
    Newest Member
    Seagrove
    Joined 19/10/19 18:34
  • Posts

    • Hey @dmedin. That news piece is something I long suspected. If anyone can move the market with just one tweet then why shouldn't the cronies profit from it. I'm just surprised this has taken so long to get to the "news".
    • Ok, so I took this approach to the next level. Rather than telling the algorithm enter long at 25% and enter short at 75% levels, I decided to let the algorithm decide itself at what levels its best to enter short or long. This simplifies the strategy and boosts its gains dramatically. Top level stats over 100,000 5min candles: Gain: +1,307% % of winning trades: 60% Starting with a £2000 account, after 1 year and 1 quarter that account would have grown to almost £30k (£28k). The equity curve looks also a lot more stable, too. I resolved the issue with the lot size, this is now a formula. Unfortunately we still have 3 negative months, but overall the max runup is a lot higher than the max drawdown. Overall time in market is only 20%, so there should be the opportunity to run multiple of this strategy on different assets simultaneously to further boost the return. If let's say 3 of these programs could run simultaneously and deliver similar results you could grow £2000 to £100k within about 18 months. Still not as good as the results of the few world-class top traders like Ross Cameron from Warrior Trading, etc but a start nonetheless. The variables which the program optimised are the following: Take Profit for Long Positions: 84 points Take Profit for Short Positions: 70 Points Entry LvL for Long Positions: 23 Points below the low of previous day Entry LvL for Short Positions: 7 Points below the high of previous day Interestingly, it turned out the strategy works best without a set stop-loss, but just to close out any open positions at 21.00 o'clock at night, if not already closed by the take profit rule. I'm gonna simulate this on NASDAQ next. Obviously will need to find out the 4 variables again, as these will be subject to the Index where this is traded.   What do you guys think? Worth a shot this strategy?  
    • Lool, I'm sorry for my first post here, but it's funny :)
×
×