Jump to content

How will we pay for all the fiscal stimulus?

Recommended Posts

Of course, governments have to provide support to the economy, businesses and individuals. But I just wonder how all these massive packages will be paid for. A lot of people are demanding that governments print even more money than already announced via QE. I see this just leading to massive inflationary pressures that will stoke interest rate rises in the medium term. That might result in an even bigger problem than the Coronavirus problem with so much personal, corporate and national debts.

Share this post


Link to post

Young man, where did the money come from to bail out the banks in 2008 and who paid for it?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Young man, where did the money come from to bail out the banks in 2008 and who paid for it?

 

clandestine MMT obviously.

  • Thought provoking 2

Share this post


Link to post

The bank bailout primarily only really led to inflation in the stock market as evidenced by the subdued inflation. This will be different if money is just handed out as it will then also fuel increase in demand without any increase in productivity. That will just fuel inflation in the real economy.

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, Eurobonus said:

The bank bailout primarily only really led to inflation in the stock market as evidenced by the subdued inflation. This will be different if money is just handed out as it will then also fuel increase in demand without any increase in productivity. That will just fuel inflation in the real economy.

 

Like I told you, if you've just finished getting a degree in economics you haven't even started your education yet.  The word you were looking for was austerity.  Neither does handing out money automatically lead to inflation.

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, dmedin said:

 

Like I told you, if you've just finished getting a degree in economics you haven't even started your education yet.  The word you were looking for was austerity.  Neither does handing out money automatically lead to inflation.

You are really an arrogant know it all. You make a lot of assumptions based on your prejudice and arrogance. I have a BSC in Economics from the LSE and a MSc in Finance from the London Business School. I started my career with Deutsche Bank, been CFO for an international company, Associate Director of Finance for a company managing well into the teens of billions of pounds in real estate assets. So yeah your assumption that I have just graduated is probably correct dmedin.

Furthermore, you don't remember 1987 and the inflationary pressures afterwards?

Share this post


Link to post
18 minutes ago, Eurobonus said:

You are really an arrogant know it all. You make a lot of assumptions based on your prejudice and arrogance. I have a BSC in Economics from the LSE and a MSc in Finance from the London Business School. I started my career with Deutsche Bank, been CFO for an international company, Associate Director of Finance for a company managing well into the teens of billions of pounds in real estate assets. So yeah your assumption that I have just graduated is probably correct dmedin.

 

 

Then why are you slumming it on here and using spread betting?  🤔

Share this post


Link to post

Bringing it back on topic...

The last round of QE didn't cause a large bout of inflation? Not in the "real" economy anyway. The stock market went crazy yes, and houses. British people LOVE houses.

As for paying for it, add it onto the national debt, and keep rolling it till the principle is inflated away.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, dmedin said:

 

Then why are you slumming it on here and using spread betting?  🤔

Cause I am in self quarantine and nothing better to do. But my big positions I execute via Credit Suisse. They provide me with all the tools - shorting, options, futures, mini futures etc. IG I do for fun. 

  • Great! 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Eurobonus said:

. IG I do for fun. 

 

That's just as well because it's near impossible to make reliable returns on spread betting.

it's just one big gamble, with all the odds heavily against you :)

Share this post


Link to post

Apparently the UK treasury will announce some kind of wage support for PAYE staff. Any predictions?

I think the finer details may take a few more days to work out. But if the govt postponed taking tax/NI through PAYE, it would leave a significant portion of cash in the business. Tax can make up 25-50% of a persons pay, so this would reduce the cost of keeping the employee in a job. The employee would still receive the same takehome pay.

Share this post


Link to post
5 minutes ago, Bopperz said:

Apparently the UK treasury will announce some kind of wage support for PAYE staff. Any predictions?

Gotta keep workers alive ... who else will do all the gruntwork for our billionaire rulers?

Share this post


Link to post

I do have a bit of a chip on my shoulder at the moment, but......

The daily death rate of the world is 100,000 people. The current deaths attributed to this virus are 10,000 (in two months). This is ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, Bopperz said:

I do have a bit of a chip on my shoulder at the moment, but......

The daily death rate of the world is 100,000 people. The current deaths attributed to this virus are 10,000 (in two months). This is ridiculous.

 

Facts don't matter ...

At times like these we all realize how powerless and hopeless we are.  :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51977802

 

I'm wondering what will happen to the suicide rate if we have to put up with this all year and into next.  It already feels unbearable :)

But hey, at least the Tories have the rich people's back huh :)

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post
53 minutes ago, Bopperz said:

Apparently the UK treasury will announce some kind of wage support for PAYE staff. Any predictions?

I think the finer details may take a few more days to work out. But if the govt postponed taking tax/NI through PAYE, it would leave a significant portion of cash in the business. Tax can make up 25-50% of a persons pay, so this would reduce the cost of keeping the employee in a job. The employee would still receive the same takehome pay.

I strongly believe that there will be tax relief as well as delayed tax payments to alleviate cash flows. But it seems people believe that the government has an endless amount of money available or can print unlimited amounts of money. However, there is always a cost and someone always has to pay. The measures have to be made but I am just worried about the medium to long term consequences.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, Eurobonus said:

However, there is always a cost and someone always has to pay

 

Do you think the very rich will pay?

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, dmedin said:

 

Do you think the very rich will pay?

I am sure a lot of rich people have lost a lot. I know a US hedge fund guy who has lost $115 million and essentially broke. Two ex-Goldman Sachs traders who set up their own fund have had to close it.

Think most will pay in one way or another. 

Share this post


Link to post

And now on SKY News, they are warning of future HYPERINFLATION. That's what I am worried about. Seriously considering buying a few KGs of gold as insurance.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,422
    • Total Posts
      63,139
    • Total Members
      83,821
    Newest Member
    huangzx
    Joined 19/09/20 01:09
  • Posts

    • I want to believe that, even if we had viruses for many years and we lived with them like nothing happened, this one is killing more people than it should. At least is what reports are saying. That is why countries are forcing lock-downs. Think about that a lock-down is going to extend the furlough policies all over the world again. I don't think a government want to pay that money out to citizens if they don't have to, and companies are going to have to close business for good if we have a second lock-down everywhere. I agree with the statement that we had many corona-viruses before i.e. common flu, but why now governments are taking these draconian measures to force people into a quarantine? If we had the same dangerous viruses always around why are they now locking people at their homes. Did they not care about people before? I think the virus is way more deadly than they tell us and that is why people are not really that scared of it. If we had all the information that is available to professionals we would be really scared and people would lock themselves without waiting any government to tell them. My wife is Chinese and I get their news first hand. They are not reporting what is really happening since the very beginning and it is really hard to trust the Chinese government  on anything related to this virus. They still have the problem there, they keep locking entire cities down for short periods the minute they see anything. It is not reported here in the news but every week they lock people down at their homes.  This virus is really nasty and if locking people down is going to stop it, let's do it. 
    • I agree with 99% of this - the current strain is virtually exact to a strain found in 2012 by a group of Chinese scientists, then when 6 of them died from exposure the virus was sealed and sent to Wuhan I challenged David Icke  to prove the excess deaths were'nt excess deaths, from the info I looked into I'm satisfied the virus is genuine and I'm probably one of the worlds biggest sceptics  From a lock down point of view I'd of thought the perfect place to test out compliance of mass herds would be the USA - hasn't happened strongly enough for me to be concerned but it shown those that could create such circumstances how compliment most people are.  
    • Corona virus has been with us since forever we just never mass tested before. There are no extra deaths this year than any other and it's the same unfortunate types who die of corona virus every year (over 80's with pre-existing conditions 90% of cases). Corona virus is always circulating in the population most people being completely unaware and asymptomatic, herd immunity is built and the virus mutates or dies out. Tests just show you have been exposed to the virus at some stage which could have been months ago and you were most likely asymptomatic. Vaccines don't work for corona virus because they mutate very quickly which is why there is no vaccine for the common cold (a corona virus). And why flu shots don't work very often because they are based on the previous years dominant strain not the current year's (the mass manufacturing would be too late). Covid 19 has already been mutating and the last studies I saw several weeks ago confirmed that as usual a particularly nasty strain becomes less deadly with each new mutation. Another 30,000 people will die next year from respiratory infections as it's the 5 year rolling average (covid 19 or not), weather it'll be covid 19 next year or another strain no one knows but they will keep the covid ball rolling anyway. So all in all it looks like lockdown til the end of time.      
×
×