Jump to content

Covid and the Economy


Recommended Posts

Take 10 minutes to read what actual 'experts' are saying about this latest Ferguson Fiasco and how the testing is currently being done.

 

...on the oFPR, I commend to you that you disregard the daily “X thousands of new infections yesterday” headlines. These reports are just not true. These statements assume (if they’ve thought about it at all) that the oFPR is zero, which it certainly isn’t. That value could... 

 

Thread by @MichaelYeadon3 on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

you are without doubt the most dishonest person that's ever been on this forum.  For over 9 months I have been continuously posting WHO, NHS, PHE, CDC, UK gov and US gov data, you have never really challenged any of it but instead try pick at the edges as if that might change the point, 'oh that's slightly out of date' is the best you ever come up with. But usually you just pretend to yourself it doesn't exist or that it's all just memes because you simply can not stand facts that don't suit you bias.

 

Pathetic would be an understatement, I can see why you just stick to the BBC evening news for your sole source of information and clearly simple searching is beyond you, tapping in just a few key word from the 'screenshot' would have found the web page. I really must lower my expectations of the levels of intelligence on here.

Spain Number of deaths, 1950-2020 - knoema.com 

 

.

You can keep insulting, that is your style when you have no actual reply.

There is something that I will never do, and that is to say that I am more intelligent than anyone else, even in an argument. You on the contrary keep telling everyone, not only me,  that dares to challenge you all sort of undermining insults, putting yourself on top of them instantly. Giving yourself the title of "intelligent".

So here is one for you: "Tell me what you bluff about and I´ll tell you what you lack off"

Edited by jlz
  • Great! 1
Link to comment
7 hours ago, jlz said:

There is something that I will never do

Hahaha,

Deliberate misrepresentation of my posts and the persistent forwarding of strawman arguments is outright dishonesty. That's what you do and it is insulting and childish quite frankly.

7 hours ago, jlz said:

that dares to challenge you

That's the point, you don't challenge anything, 'oh I don't like the NHS data you posted boohoo you must be bad'. FFS grow up.

7 hours ago, jlz said:

So here is one for you: "Tell me what you bluff about and I´ll tell you what you lack off"

Try this again in intelligible English.

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Simple solution ...

Lilith of Assyria  @LilithAssyria

Reminder: Russia is fully open:

* museums

* restaurants * cinemas

* theatres * gyms without or capacity limits

* schools without /plexiglass or idiotic hybrid

 

How did Russia stop pandemic?! Simple: no asymptomatic testing beginning of December. That’s it, folks.

 

 

image.png.f8497686b5ca2529ff99bb0f847fa952.png

 

.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

Hahaha,

Deliberate misrepresentation of my posts and the persistent forwarding of strawman arguments is outright dishonesty. That's what you do and it is insulting and childish quite frankly.

That's the point, you don't challenge anything, 'oh I don't like the NHS data you posted boohoo you must be bad'. FFS grow up.

Try this again in intelligible English.

 

I was wondering when would you use my English to undermine me, you took way too long. I guess it is because you think people read this thread, so you have to be careful.

Someone like you would have used that trick earlier.

Regarding the Russians, you are pasting screenshots without citing the source again. Come on... We have spoken about this. You can't keep posting dodgy screenshots from Twitter. You have a reputation to maintain.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
3 hours ago, jlz said:

I guess it is because you think people read this thread

over a hundred view a day.

 

3 hours ago, jlz said:

Someone like you would have used that trick earlier.

 again in English please.

3 hours ago, jlz said:

Regarding the Russians, you are pasting screenshots without citing the source again. Come on... We have spoken about this. You can't keep posting dodgy screenshots from Twitter

this is a common forum not a scientific journal, if you don't like something prove it wrong.

Not sure why you don't start a new thread, you could post all the news you heard on the BBC, you could keep calling me 'far right' which is tantamount to calling someone a fascist, and tell them about how I only post 'far right' memes. And of course tell everyone about how virtuous you are, I'm sure everyone would love to read it.  

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

Reminder: Russia is fully open:

Took 30 seconds to find a report from Reuters:

Quote

 

Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said new daily cases were considerably lower than at the end of December and that a tangible drop in daily hospital admissions to 1,200-1,300 people from 1,500-1,800 had made him cautiously optimistic.

“Vaccination rates have significantly increased. Over 220,000 Muscovites have already received reliable protection from the virus,” Sobyanin wrote on his website.

“In this situation, we can allow ourselves to considerably soften existing restrictions.”

State-run universities will continue to operate with distanced learning, but colleges and specialist institutions can reopen fully from Friday, Sobyanin said.

Theatres, cinemas and concert halls will be allowed to increase capacity to 50%, as will museums, libraries and stadiums for sports events.

Restrictions that will remain include bars and restaurants having to close early, the wearing of medical masks in shops and on public transport, and businesses having to limit the number of staff in offices to 30%.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-russia-cases/moscow-to-relax-some-restrictions-as-daily-russian-covid-19-cases-ease-idUSKBN29Q0V3

 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Provaton said:

that's interesting, and you're learning to search, well done. 

so unlike here, bars, restaurants, cimemas, concert halls, theatres etc are all open in Moscow.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

Not sure why you don't start a new thread, you could post all the news you heard on the BBC, you could keep calling me 'far right' which is tantamount to calling someone a fascist, and tell them about how I only post 'far right' memes. And of course tell everyone about how virtuous you are, I'm sure everyone would love to read it.  

I don't need to feel important about myself copying news from other sites. Twitter memes should stay on Twitter, that is what the site is for.

Also I don't think that I should bother other users that come to this forum for trading topics with news that are not related to trading.

The only reason I reply to this thread is because you feel too important about yourself and send insults away easily. We don't have the troll around any more, apparently, so you are the only entertainment we have left.

The clown was good for a while but he disappeared, he gave us epic topics like DNA chips and massive brain control, but he is not willing to stick around. A real shame.

  • Like 1
  • Great! 1
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

that's interesting, and you're learning to search, well done. 

Do you actually double check anything you post?

I've just posted something from a reliable source that totally contradicts something you posted earlier and all you can do is sarcastically congratulate me on being able to search the web.

Are you going to delete your false post or just leave it there to add to the volumes of misinformation on this thread?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Important chart on 'Other' deaths. Horizontal zero is average/normal.

Look at cancer (yellow) progressively less deaths since lockdown 1, at this rate it won't be long before there are no cancer deaths at all. But that can't be right, because of lockdown there are far less cancers being diagnosed therefore fewer cancers being treated. So cancer deaths must be going up not down. So where are they all?

They have been 'rebranded' and you can guess as to what. Same for the chronic respiratory diseases, bronchitis, emphysema etc, all systematically being rebranded.

Strokes and heart disease, the levels are horizontal or slightly up but we know diagnosis is way down and so then are treatments so deaths must be way up. 

Covid rebranding is systematic and across the board. If you can't see the sham being perpetrated here you must be blind. 

 

image.png.fbd1d673aa35e1b9654ea3eb16c5f1cb.png

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, jlz said:

I don't need to feel important about myself copying news from other sites. Twitter memes should stay on Twitter, that is what the site is for.

Also I don't think that I should bother other users that come to this forum for trading topics with news that are not related to trading.

The only reason I reply to this thread is because you feel too important about yourself and send insults away easily. We don't have the troll around any more, apparently, so you are the only entertainment we have left.

The clown was good for a while but he disappeared, he gave us epic topics like DNA chips and massive brain control, but he is not willing to stick around. A real shame.

Hate to be the one to break this to you but no one gives a **** what you think (over a hundred views a day).

The only reason you reply is out of desperation as you see the facts mount up and overturn your precious pro lockdown point of view and you just can't stand it.

Bye

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Provaton said:

Do you actually double check anything you post?

I've just posted something from a reliable source that totally contradicts something you posted earlier and all you can do is sarcastically congratulate me on being able to search the web.

Are you going to delete your false post or just leave it there to add to the volumes of misinformation on this thread?

 

oh, English can't be your first language either. I read your linked article and it clearly said bars, restaurants, cimemas, concert halls, theatres etc are all open in Moscow.

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

oh, English can't be your first language either. I read your linked article and it clearly said bars, restaurants, cimemas, concert halls, theatres etc are all open in Moscow.

Ah, another insult...

I was not saying everything was closed, I was simply pointing out that your post stating "Russia is fully open" was a lie.

Quote

Theatres, cinemas and concert halls will be allowed to increase capacity to 50%, as will museums, libraries and stadiums for sports events.

Which implies to me they are open but were reduced to less than 50% capacity and are now allowed to increase to 50% capacity. Not eaxctly "fully open".

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

Look at cancer (yellow) progressively less deaths since lockdown 1, at this rate it won't be long before there are no cancer deaths at all.

I looked at your link, it doesn't exactly support your theory that "it won't be long before there are no cancer deaths at all". Basically a 1% drop since March...at this rate it will be about 100 years....

(Deaths since 21 March 2020):

image.png.10bc5281a289e84ac6e91645799460b7.png

Link to comment

The govt is caught in a trap. Drunk on power it has run straight into a sewer and is in it up to it's neck. This farce would end tomorrow if the govt either stopped testing asymptomatic people, or capped the cycle threshold of the PCR test to 25, or only used the PCR if an antigen test (Lateral Flow) was positive first.

Either of these would burst the bubble of the PCR false positives and 50% to 80% of cases would just disappear.

But the govt can't do that because to do so would be an admission of gross incompetence or negligence or worse and would cause an avalanche of compensation claims.

The govt's only hope is to keep pretending herd immunity doesn't exist, keep the false positives flowing and pin everything on vaccine immunity.

The problem there is that it will take time and will also need 60% - 70% vaccine up take, that currently is looking unlikely so need to ramp up the fear campaign which is why new tv ads were ready and waiting.

As soon as the numbers are reached then burst the PCR false positive bubble, give the vaccine the credit and the govt is off the hook. Trouble is no one knows when the numbers will be reached so we are stuck in limbo till then.

Meanwhile of course lockdown kills.

 

Surge of Student Suicides Pushes Las Vegas Schools to Reopen - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

.

 

 

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Provaton said:

Ah, another insult...

I was not saying everything was closed, I was simply pointing out that your post stating "Russia is fully open" was a lie.

Which implies to me they are open but were reduced to less than 50% capacity and are now allowed to increase to 50% capacity. Not eaxctly "fully open".

you see in English, closed means closed and open means open.  It's really quite simple once you've got the hang of it.

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

Interesting Fox News investigation on the origins of COVID-19 and links to US commissioned research.

So, we've now moved on from the false Russia story and the cancer story which was not fully investigated/explained and the next story is posted....from Fox News....

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Provaton said:

So, we've now moved on from the false Russia story and the cancer story which was not fully investigated/explained and the next story is posted....from Fox News....

 

I have absolutely no idea what on earth you are talking about. you confirmed the Russia story. the lack of cancer deaths is clear or where do you think the missing deaths have gone?

Link to comment

Prof Norman Fenton @profnfenton

''But more evidence today (WHO revised PCR testing guidelines) that covid 'cases' (positive PCR tests) have been over-inflating death stats for a long time. Latest data on UK 999 covid calls/triages suggests we're nowhere near spring peak of people seriously ill BECAUSE of covid;;

image.png.72d22c93b0f4548e806450d6975626e1.png

 

.

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

I have absolutely no idea what on earth you are talking about. you confirmed the Russia story. the lack of cancer deaths is clear or where do you think the missing deaths have gone?

You stated: "Russia is fully open", I posted an article explaining how it wasn't, you basically ignored it.

You stated: "Look at cancer (yellow) progressively less deaths since lockdown 1, at this rate it won't be long before there are no cancer deaths at all. ", I posted the actual stats that show cancer deaths down about 1% compared to a "normal" year, is that even statistically significant? Anyway, again you just ignored it and moved on...

Carry on, don't let the facts get in the way of a good meme....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
19 minutes ago, Provaton said:

You stated: "Russia is fully open", I posted an article explaining how it wasn't, you basically ignored it.

You stated: "Look at cancer (yellow) progressively less deaths since lockdown 1, at this rate it won't be long before there are no cancer deaths at all. ", I posted the actual stats that show cancer deaths down about 1% compared to a "normal" year, is that even statistically significant? Anyway, again you just ignored it and moved on...

Carry on, don't let the facts get in the way of a good meme....

why are you wasting your time and my time with this stupid pedantic nonsense? 

The OP was about Russia, your link was about Moscow and the bars are open, now you're squirming over the definition of 'fully' for one region of Russia. FO.

The point of the missing deaths is that it is across the board, it's all deaths. Was just reading about a builder who fell off a ladder and died, after death was tested for covid and guess what, covid is now listed on the death cert. That's the point, so again FO.

Link to comment

To all the Covid hysterics out there I am a Paramedic of 19 years and working on the frontline since Covid began. I have seen NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING that would give me any indication there is a killer virus out there. I have seen ONE patient who MAY have had severe Covid but could equally plausibly had a number of other known conditions such as Sepsis, heart failure etc.

The usual replies are “you’re a liar”, “you should be sacked” I’m a fantasist etc etc I’ve literally heard them all but I am telling the truth, there is nothing out there.

Link to comment
42 minutes ago, Provaton said:

You stated: "Russia is fully open", I posted an article explaining how it wasn't, you basically ignored it.

You stated: "Look at cancer (yellow) progressively less deaths since lockdown 1, at this rate it won't be long before there are no cancer deaths at all. ", I posted the actual stats that show cancer deaths down about 1% compared to a "normal" year, is that even statistically significant? Anyway, again you just ignored it and moved on...

Carry on, don't let the facts get in the way of a good meme....

just realised you also missed the most important point about the cancer stats and that is the 'expected' figure is based on a normal year but in 2020 there is a short fall of over 50,000 cancer diagnoses so the expectation is for a lot more deaths than a 'normal' year but of course they are not there either.. 

Link to comment
On 23/03/2020 at 07:57, Caseynotes said:

Reminder that the death toll from common types of influenza in the US range from 80,000 to 120,000 per year. The WuFlu death toll for the US currently stands at around 400.

...but now nearly 11 months since the first death in the US, the figure is over 400k.  Testing may be flawed but the end result seems to be fairly solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html

Link to comment
12 hours ago, NotAlwaysVolatile said:

...but now nearly 11 months since the first death in the US, the figure is over 400k.  Testing may be flawed but the end result seems to be fairly solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html

The UK has followed the Fauci (US) lead pretty much all the way. Initially recommending the WHO pandemic guidelines (2016, updated 2019) until in March 2020 China got the WHO to forget the original protocol and adopt the untested social distancing and financially ruinous lockdown strategy.

The UK also followed the US in the use of the PCR test run at 45 cycles which, when applied to mass testing of asymptomatic people gives a false positive ratio of 85% as proven by studies though a precise figure will vary lab to lab.

Essentially numbers derived in this manor are garbage  but that seems to suit both the health service and politicians (in both countries) or they would change it.

Previously posted in this thread is a NYT report from 2007 on the PCR test causing pseudo epidemics by precisely this method.

   

Link to comment

another 200,000 out of work because of govt policy. 

Birmingham has seen its benefit claimant rate rise from 5.8 per cent to nearly 10 per cent since March - three times the national average

https://t.co/z4matwfiOl

https://t.co/uEGiTdPCcI

"At present, the timetable to lifting the current lockdown has slipped to July. Any more drift and all we will be able to see is everlasting lockdown"

https://t.co/Q92z91CIfz

So perhaps a short break over summer, IF you behave yourself, and then back to the winter season lockdowns again.

This is all fine 🤪 hahaha.

 

.

 

Link to comment
  • CharlotteIG changed the title to Covid and the Economy
  • MongiIG locked this topic
  • MongiIG unlocked this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      22,138
    • Total Posts
      93,022
    • Total Members
      42,521
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Dan_SB
    Joined 06/06/23 18:53
  • Posts

    • HI can anyone tell me when IG will publish CTC for the 2022/23 tax year please? Cheers
    • EUR/USD had a look lower but is treading water for now; while the ascending trend has been broken, it might resume and there are bullish bearish and perspectives for EUR/USD. Which will prevail?   Source: Bloomberg   Forex Shares EUR/USD Market trend Euro United States dollar Daniel McCarthy | Strategist, | Publication date: Tuesday 06 June 2023  EUR/USD has recovered from the 10-week low seen last week at 1.0635. This was only a fraction below the 78.6% Fibonacci Retracement of the move from 1.0516 to 1.1096 at 1.0640. This may see the 1.0635 – 40 area set up as a potential support zone ahead of the prior lows at 1.0525, 1.0516, 1.0483 and 1.0443. The longer-term 200- and 260-day simple moving averages (SMA) are in among the cluster of lows between 1.0443 to 1.0525 and might lend support. Since breaking below the trend line established from a series of lows seen between September and November last year, the price has remained below the 10-, 21-, 34, 55- and 100-day SMAs. This could suggest that short and medium-term bearish momentum might be intact. On the flip side, the price remains above the 200- and 260-day SMAs, which may suggest the underlying longer-term bullish trend is yet to be undone. A break above the trend line axis has the potential to reinstate the ascending trend. It currently dissects with the 34-day SMA near 1.0875. The 34-day SMA has just broken below the 55-day SMA, creating a Death Cross. Similarly, the 21-day SMA has also created a Death Cross by crossing below the 100-day SMA. A Death Cross is a potential signal for an evolving bearish trend. In April and May, a series of highs were seen in the 1.1075 – 95 area and this might offer a resistance zone. In the bigger picture, a clean take out of these levels may confirm the resumption of the ascending trend. These tops created an extension of a Double Top formation that heralded the sell-off last month. It should be noted though that past performance is not indicative of future results. The neckline from this formation is at 1.0942 and it might offer resistance. The price action on Monday saw a Spinning Top Candlestick emerge which may indicate indecision in the market for EUR/USD direction, potentially setting up a range trading type environment. As laid out above, there are mixed signals in EUR/USD for now. As always, sound risk management is the foundation for trading.   Source: TradingView This information has been prepared by DailyFX, the partner site of IG offering leading forex news and analysis. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients.
    • Beginners' guide to fundamental analysis Use fundamental analysis to identify markets that are under- or over-priced, by looking at the economic and financial factors which affect their value. Learn about fundamental analysis and how to use it in your trading. Source: Bloomberg   Shares Fundamental analysis Investment Price Value investing Profit  Callum Cliffe | Financial writer, London What is fundamental analysis? Fundamental analysis is a means of measuring a company’s actual or ‘intrinsic’ value by assessing economic and financial factors, such as a balance sheet, macroeconomic indicators and management forecasts. Most companies’ share prices will not always reflect their intrinsic value, as market prices are driven by rational elements – such as a company’s ability to generate revenue and profits – as well as irrational factors, such as market sentiment towards a company and media perception. Fundamental analysis is used to estimate the intrinsic value of a stock, ignoring short-term trends and investor enthusiasm, to determine the true price that a company should be trading at. Once you know the intrinsic value of a stock, you can compare it to the market price. You’ll then be able to tell whether a company is undervalued or overvalued – giving you an indication of whether to buy or sell the asset. For example, if a stock was overpriced, it could decline at some point in the future and if the stock was undervalued, you could take a position early and profit if the market value changes to reflect the intrinsic value. Fundamental analysis vs technical analysis Technical analysis is concerned with the historical price movements of an asset. So, you’d need knowledge of chart patterns and what each pattern might mean for the future price movements of a stock. Learn about 16 candlestick patterns all traders should know Fundamental analysis, on the other hand, requires an in-depth knowledge of your chosen market and sector so that you can quickly and accurately identify viable companies based on news reports, financial statements or changes in company leadership.     Different types of fundamental analysis Fundamental analysis’s primary goal is to estimate the intrinsic value of a company, or the value at which the price should tend to over time. This can be achieved using several methodologies, which are often divided in two categories: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative fundamental analysis methods look at a company’s viability as an investment in numerical metrics, such as profit and loss statements, cash flow statement and market share. A trader would use these metrics to assess how the company is being run, and whether it is capable of yielding a profit. It is with this analysis that the trader might decide to open or close a position, depending on how profitable they perceive the company to be. Then there’s qualitative fundamental analysis which assesses factors that affect the character or quality of the company, such as brand recognition, senior management or customer satisfaction. On the whole, fundamental analysis is focused on qualitative analysis. Popular qualitative analysis methods include: Top-down or bottom-up approach Porter’s five forces SWOT analysis Economic moats   Top-down or bottom-up approach To use a top-down approach, you’d look at global macroeconomic metrics – including gross domestic product (GDP), unemployment rates, inflation, and interest rates – to identify favourable countries and regions. Once the list is narrowed for the top performing countries, you’d identify stand-out industries within those economies, which will also involve analysis the number of companies, average net profit margin and price elasticity. Finally, you’d refine the remaining list to include only the best businesses in those sectors, in terms of price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, profit and loss and other metrics.     The bottom-up model follows an opposite filtering order, going from analysing individual companies and then widening your search to include relevant studies on the sector and country or region they are in.The bottom-up model follows an opposite filtering order, going from analysing individual companies and then widening your search to include relevant studies on the sector and country or region they are in. Porter’s five forces Michael Porter developed a framework that analyses the intensity of competition within an industry, which you can use to understand the likelihood of a company's long-term profitability. It is based on five key variables: Barriers to entry – the threats facing new companies, such as setting up costs Threat of substitution – how likely it is that a consumer could switch products easily Bargaining power of suppliers – the number of supplies available decreases the power of each supplier to make demands Bargaining power of customers – the high cost of switching supplier and low competition decreases the power of consumers who have few alternatives Competitive rivalry – intense rivalries can drive brand loyalty and encourage strategic concentration   SWOT analysis SWOT analysis is a method that’s focused on identifying a company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and any threats. Strengths and weaknesses are internal attributes of the organisation – such as talent or brand reputation – while opportunities and threats are based on the external environment, for example a country’s legislation or how fast the industry is growing. This type of analysis is designed to facilitate a purely fact-driven assessment of an organisation, avoiding any emotional and inaccurate decision making. It can help guide you toward businesses that are more likely to have long-term success in their industry.   Economic moats The term economic moats was first coined by Warren Buffett, as a way of describing a business´ ability to maintain a competitive advantage over its opponents over time. The metaphor of a medieval castle is used to solidify the idea of protecting a firm’s profits from outsiders. Investors should look for businesses that currently have, and will be able to maintain, a competitive advantage. This allows the company to outperform the market over the long term, and hopefully secure you a profit. The main ways of creating an economic moat are:   How to use fundamental analysis You can use fundamental analysis to identify buy and sell signals in the market of your choice. If your fundament analysis indicates the asset is undervalued compared to its intrinsic value, you could opt to buy the market – and if it was overvalued, you might see it as an opportunity to go short. The way you use fundamental analysis will depend on your style of investing and your trading goals.   Value investing Value investing seeks to identify potentially undervalued companies. Key metrics that are used include a low price-to-book or P/E ratio, economic moats and a high dividend yield. Value investors look to buy comparatively cheap companies with secure long-term prospects. Benjamin Graham is considered by many as the father of the value investing and wrote the iconic book ‘The Intelligent Investor’. He believed that in their search for undervalued companies, a value investor will prioritise the quality of the business over the market price. As summarised by Graham’s famous student, Warren Buffett, ‘It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price, than to buy a fair company at a wonderful price’. This investment style is generally intertwined with contrarian investing, as they both argue that going against the crowd or prevailing sentiment at the time (buy when everyone is selling, sell when everyone is buying) tends to offer positive rewards.   Growth investing Growth investing was developed by Thomas Price and popularised by Philip Fisher with his book ‘Common Stocks and Uncommon profits’. It focuses on companies with a high growth potential even if share price appears expensive in terms of metrics. Instead of investing in an already established company, the investor will take a risk on companies that have the potential to continue growing at a higher-than-average rate. Growth companies are found predominantly in the technology or pharma sectors.   GARP investing A growth at a reasonable price (GARP) strategy blends aspects of both value and growth investing, with investors seeking companies with exponential growth but at a competitive price. Popularised by investment manager Peter Lynch, and developed with his book ‘One Up on Wall Street’, it uses a financial ratio called price-to-earnings growth (PEG) as its main way to identify attractive companies. Once a company is analysed, it is divided into one of six different categories based on growth potential: slow, stalwart, fast, cyclicals, turnarounds and asset plays. A concrete metric is given to each, helping to identify growth shares that are trading at a reasonable price. Lynch also uses subjective criteria such as the customer’s satisfaction. As an example, he claims that his best investment in Taco Bell was driven by the fact that ‘he like their sandwiches’. Pros and cons of fundamental analysis Pros of fundamental analysis Fundamental analysis helps traders and investors to gather the right information to make rational decisions about what position to take. By basing these decisions on financial data, there is limited room for personal biases. Rather than establishing entry and exit points, fundamental analysis seeks to understand the value of an asset, so that traders can take a much longer-term view of the market. Once the trader has determined a numerical value for the asset, they can compare it to the current market price to assess whether the asset is over- or under-valued. The aim is to then profit from the market correction. Cons of fundamental analysis Fundamental analysis can be time consuming, it requires multiple areas of analysis, which can make the process extremely complicated. As fundamental analysis takes a much longer-term view of the market, the results of the findings are not suitable for quick decisions. Traders looking to create a methodology for entering and exiting trades in the short term might be better suited to technical analysis. It is also important to consider the best and the worst-case scenario. While fundamental analysis provides a more well-rounded view of the market, it is possible for negative economic, political or legislative changes to surprise markets.
×
×
  • Create New...