Jump to content

Covid and the Economy


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, HPbrand said:

Looks like Fauci been a lackey for a long time. Even Uncle Soros is young enough to stand on his own.

Gates Sr and Fauci.jpg

 

 

Hmm, 'left wing' billionaires, bipartisan establishment figures and Republican presidents.

Seems like a 'class' to me, and the whole Democrat/Republican false dichotomy is simply two cheeks of the same a.r.s.e :D

Edited by dmedin
Link to post
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Still can't quite work out why we are deliberately destroying the economies of every first world nation because of this flu virus. Yesterday I went shopping at the local mega supermarket where the she

It looks like Trump is surrounded by mercenaries. He does not want complete lockdown in US but other coordinated forces keeping up the pressure. Interesting fact. Both CDC and Johns Hopkins recei

I  follow this page and I saw how Spain became from a nice yellowish spot to a complete red warning place. Mainly because of the great number of tourists that went there in summer. https://www.ec

Posted Images

12 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

AFP news agency  @AFP

19m

#BREAKING Danish schools begin reopening after month-long closure

Come on Danish school kids!  Drive up the value of our stocks for us :D

Link to post

We have a piece on our news and analysis page that goes through: 

  • Understanding the potential S&P 500 recovery rate
  • Coronavirus outlook
  • What could happen if the situation worsens?
  • What could happen if the situation improves?
  • C-virus and unemployment
  • Assets most affected by the c-virsus outbreak and what you can trade

https://www.ig.com/uk/news-and-trade-ideas/coronavirus-impact-on-the-stock-market

image.png

Let me know what you think

  • Sad 1
Link to post

Thanks for the link to the dashboard. I'm not convinced about the historical comparisons to economic crashes, would it not make sense to compare this to SARS etc? Fewer data points though.

As for a two year recovery..... lets hope not. I got bills to pay.

  • Like 1
Link to post
30 minutes ago, Bopperz said:

As for a two year recovery..... lets hope not. I got bills to pay.

It doesn't make any sense to call it an 'economic collapse' if it's simply a stoppage of work.  Neither does any of the talk of bankruptcies or job losses make sense if there is 'stimulus' from governments in the form of loans and payments for wages.  It only makes sense to call it a collapse if there were deep problems BEFORE the virus took place, and which are unravelling right now under the 'screen' of the virus lockdowns.

Capitalism itself is now a zombie, a corpse reanimated with lots of 'fake money'.

Link to post
52 minutes ago, CharlotteIG said:

We have a piece on our news and analysis page that goes through: 

  • Understanding the potential S&P 500 recovery rate
  • Coronavirus outlook
  • What could happen if the situation worsens?
  • What could happen if the situation improves?
  • C-virus and unemployment
  • Assets most affected by the c-virsus outbreak and what you can trade

https://www.ig.com/uk/news-and-trade-ideas/coronavirus-impact-on-the-stock-market

image.png

Let me know what you think

 

I think some people 'working from home' have found something very productive to do with their time and I can only wish I was able to do the same.

I think if this is a real crash there will need to be a major war, or else suicide rates will skyrocket - you can't really have tens of millions of people with nothing to do / unemployed for an extended time without society falling apart.  And yes, that will negatively affect the billionaire class too.

  • Like 1
Link to post
11 minutes ago, HPbrand said:

You are implying that stating public information is somehow anti-semitism if it does not fit the mainstream narrative?

We are all free to choose what and how information is processed in our head. Keep doing what you do and think the way you do and get the same results you are getting in life.

 

You posted what looks to be a white nationalist website.  Those people have a strong tendency to be criminals.  Islamic extremism is non-mainstream so I suppose you believe in that too.

Link to post

The BBC only covered the first few seconds of Trump's speech before the narrator intervened to inform the British public what to think ... but isn't that what the BBC has always done?  The British people have always been treated like brainless idiots by the establishment, and their behaviour tends to confirm it.

At least Bloomberg covered the whole speech:

 

  • Great! 1
Link to post

Just overheard an Aussie woman outside saying 'I was so appalled at their behaviour ... I would never do that'.

Got to make sure you don't get to close to these witches, they will give you the evil eye and talk ill about you all day long.

Link to post
Just now, dmedin said:

Just overheard an Aussie woman outside saying 'I was so appalled at their behaviour ... I would never do that'.

Got to make sure you don't get to close to these witches, they will give you the evil eye and talk ill about you all day long.

amazes me how many people can't tell the difference between 2 meters and 5 meters, paranoid.

Link to post
Quote

New York City, hardest hit by the outbreak, revised its death toll sharply up to more than 10,000, to include victims presumed to have died of the lung disease but never tested.

Remember, facts don't matter.  It's people's perceptions of reality that matter :D

Link to post
57 minutes ago, dmedin said:

 

You posted what looks to be a white nationalist website.  Those people have a strong tendency to be criminals.  Islamic extremism is non-mainstream so I suppose you believe in that too.

The website I listed was one from a list of sites reporting on Thomas Binder. I am concerned with facts and not with ideologies of factions or believe in extremism.

Instead of focusing on the fact which I wanted to highlight, you appear to be projecting what my supposedly believes are. I don't make money or get paid for trying to emphasize the need for everyone to think for themselves to be more successful in decision making. I see it's waste of my time.

Please don't reply to this.

Edited by HPbrand
  • Sad 1
Link to post

So the UK lockdown has been extended for three weeks! I just dont understand why. The new hospital in London has 19 patients, the new hospital in the north-east will probably never open. Why do we need more time?

I am also very confused about "flattening the peak". I understand why we needed to do it, and it looks like we have successfully done that. But why has the UK not declared the peak and started relaxing lockdown? Did the lockdown work too well and the peak is still in the future?

The removal of lockdown is going to be very slow, I don't see a way around that. Just read that Australia reopened schools and 97% of kids were kept at home by their parents.

We need to get started, people need a lot of time to adjust as they have been told they will catch this virus, die and kill the NHS. People need time to see that they will catch the virus, they wont die, they wont kill the NHS.

Link to post
32 minutes ago, Bopperz said:

So the UK lockdown has been extended for three weeks! I just dont understand why. The new hospital in London has 19 patients, the new hospital in the north-east will probably never open. Why do we need more time?

I am also very confused about "flattening the peak". I understand why we needed to do it, and it looks like we have successfully done that. But why has the UK not declared the peak and started relaxing lockdown? Did the lockdown work too well and the peak is still in the future?

The removal of lockdown is going to be very slow, I don't see a way around that. Just read that Australia reopened schools and 97% of kids were kept at home by their parents.

We need to get started, people need a lot of time to adjust as they have been told they will catch this virus, die and kill the NHS. People need time to see that they will catch the virus, they wont die, they wont kill the NHS.

the lockdown is slowing the gaining of herd immunity but it is preventing a surge of unwell people from overwhelming the nhs, in the meantime business bankruptcies are mounting. 

Those at risk of becoming seriously unwell (the over 65s (89% of deaths) and those with serious underlying conditions) should be in lockdown, the rest of the population should be out saving the economy. 

Prolonged economic destitution will cause the premature deaths of a lot more people than the virus will.

image.png.69ea48c51612ac64fade4e7210b9dfe1.png

Today's 'active cases' data from Sweden;

image.png.07e2241cd32c0e9e35a322fda8dc4292.png

There is also increasing evidence that the majority of positive antibody tests are people who never even knew they had ever been infected.

 

 

Edited by Caseynotes
Link to post

yeah right 🙄

 

First Squawk @FirstSquawk

26s

CHINA CANCELS CLINICAL TRIALS China’s efforts to find drug treatments for Covid-19 are being hampered by a lack of suitable candidates for clinical trials as the covid outbreak has been gradually brought under control, one of leading experts on respiratory diseases says: SCMP

Link to post

Bill Etheridge @BillEtheridgeuk  If this works out to be an effective treatment I look forward to the media lauding @realDonaldTrump for his early recognition of it

 

'Robert Peston  @Peston  Interesting that @MattHancock said "early signs" show that hydroxychloroquine may be "very effective treatment" for #Covid19. He implied UK government is acquiring significant stocks of it'

Link to post
  • CharlotteIG changed the title to Covid and the Economy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      15,406
    • Total Posts
      73,923
    • Total Members
      62,314
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    stefskis
    Joined 15/06/21 18:36
  • Posts

    • You need to get hung up on them, because they happen - I know for a fact that during 2007-09 bear market you could have traded long and made money, because I did it, but the easiest route was shorting and down Get a chart WEEKLY of any forex market or commodity - go back as far as poss and notice the big turns/swings - much more volatile than the SP500 - there's a reason for that  I always say anyone who's making a packet from trading or Investing on SP500 etc go have a crack at the forex or commodity markets - the stock markets natural direction is UPWARDS - especially buy and holders, fund managers would get ripped apart on the forex + comm markets OK - Its totally Impossible to know EXACTLY what the SP500 is going to do on a daily/weekly basis, but it WAS possible to know that a) 2007-09 was going to be a bear market before 2007 even arrived and b) that the market would stop around the level it did.  But this is ultra advanced and very few people are bothered about it I've written a thread on Time Cycles on here - it covers what the SP500 is doing in terms of TIME - if you understand it and think about it, it will put you ahead of 99.99999% of traders out there, because these really big corrections and crashes do not happen out of the blue - they are predictable and forecastable with high reliability years in advance  Look at the chart below - think about what I'm saying: In 1909 WD Gann said that markets always seek their gravity centre, the half way point - that's the 50% level to you and I Traders go on about fib levels - the 50% level is clearly much more important a level  What if you KNEW 1974, 2003 and 2009 should be low points? What an opportunity both long and short! This is why I researched and spent hundreds of hours on Time and Time Cycles for - I missed 2000-2009 because I didn't know what I know now, but I know when the next ones are and I have no plans of missing them These are key once in a lifetime turn points that don't happen often So what I'm trying to point out is that on the stock market the big plunges like 07-09 aren't the norm, but they do happen with very regular intervals, that will catch a lot of people out during certain cycles that the market moves through. with regards to identifying bear markets - yes using a MA to say price below this level is bearish, but it's already bearish as it approaches the level if using price formations such as lower lows etc You don't need to know what I've discovered about time to be able to trade successfully - I was just intrigued if it was possible to be able to time the really big turns etc as I'd prefer to to know if it was    
    • These are relatively rare events but I do find myself getting hung up on them. 
    • If we take the 2008 decline on the US500, I've attached a daily chart of this. You'd be better off shorting but of course you don't know that it's going to be an ongoing decline and the risk potentially is that you switch to a short preference and then the market does revert back to an upward trend. The market stayed below the 100 day MA for an extended time so maybe that's an indication of which way to trade but I know it's not always reliable. Probably also helps if you use a trailing stop at least to minimise damage.
×
×
  • Create New...