Frankieburgo

That's fair, I can see how people might be uncomfortable about that. I can also understand others being uncomfortable about being impacted by COVID. Given this is a global pandemic that has killed millions and caused long term health issues for millions more, well I don't think it's unreasonable that a vaccine has been produced faster than any time in history.

On the topic of treatments. BBC News - First pill to treat Covid gets approval in UK https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59163899

MISLEADING. Ivermectin is not "banned". https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-28-june-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-ivermectin-for-treatment-of-covid-19-foi-21-708 There is also a clinical trial ongoing to prove its effectiveness. Ivermectin is currently not approved in the UK for the prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19, however clinicians may prescribe unlicensed medicines if, in their clinical judgement, there is no suitable licensed available alternative that is capable of meeting their individual patient needs.

Not a conspiracy. In highly vaccinated populations, where the MAJORITY are vaccinated, then yes when looking at raw numbers there will be more deaths in vaccinated people. It doesn't mean that vaccines are ineffective. https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/scicheck-why-its-easy-to-misinterpret-numbers-of-deaths-among-the-vaccinated/ But again, those are raw numbers, among a highly vaccinated population. In its week 38 report, Public Health England — which has been replaced by the UK Health Security Agency — reported there were 3,158 deaths from COVID-19 from Aug. 23 through Sept. 19 and 2,284 of those individuals (72.3%) had received their second vaccine shot at least 14 days earlier. However, the same report shows vaccination rates approaching or exceeding 90% for age groups 60 and older, the group that accounts for 86.5% of all deaths in that time period. Overall, 77.3% of the U.K. population 12 and older had received two shots by Sept. 19.

DEBUNKED. Not some grand conspiracy about the effectiveness of vaccines. In fact the picture you posted explicitly says "The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/09/09/vaccine-skeptics-claim-new-cdc-gotcha-moment-they-havent-got-much/ And to the extent this is some supposed grand conspiracy to move the goal posts on the coronavirus vaccines, it would also be a very incomplete one. Throughout its website, the CDC still refers to the coronavirus vaccines providing immunity: On a page debunking myths about the coronavirus vaccines, which was updated this week, it still says, “After getting vaccinated, you develop immunity to that disease.” On another page devoted to explaining the coronavirus vaccines, it uses “protection” and “immunity” as synonyms multiple times, saying, “It typically takes 2 weeks after vaccination for the body to build protection (immunity) against the virus that causes COVID-19.” On another page: “COVID-19 vaccines help our bodies develop immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19 without us having to get the illness.”

As per my previous post, kids are vaccinated for diseases that have less occurance. It makes sense they are given the SAFE and EFFECTIVE vaccine that also helps reduce severity ,protects against long COVID and reduces the transmission period.

https://t.co/UnCOqVR1zS

Over the last 18 months you've posted nothing but pics that you've copied/pasted from Facebook and Twitter, claiming them as fact without any kind of fact-checking yourself. These types have posts have been DEBUNKED by multiple sources/organisations. The fact you get so worked up and defensive when you are even half challenged by others just says it all really..

But don't you realise the impact you can have by trying to push this narrative of "the great reset" and your claims about vaccine ineffectiveness? Go to Reddit and check out the Herman Cain award. Misinformation like which is contained in your posts has a real impact on real people. Whether or not you look into your own links with a critical eye, the reality is that people read these types of posts without doing that, and take for face value these cheap claims. You could stop someone from getting the vaccine, or believing in the danger of COVID, and have real consequences.

I suggest you remove the link from your post until you can back up your "research".

I haven't posted anything considered as MSM. I only took what links/posts you claimed and looked into them myself.

Your chart just proves the effectiveness of the vaccine in reducing deaths. Nice one.

Just relax buddy. Take a deep breath.

And yet you still agree that vaccines are more effective than ivermectin. Which is it? The fact is, vaccines remain the most effective tool we have to manage COVID. You've already proved we can't trust anything you post because you DON'T DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH

Like most heavily vaccinated countries that have reduced social distancing restrictions, cases have indeed spiked. But due to their high vaccination rates, Singapore has one of the lowest death rates. Proof that vaccines WORK in helping things return to normal.