Jump to content

greenscorpio1000

Community Member
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

greenscorpio1000's Achievements

Frequent Contributor

Frequent Contributor (3/10)

4

Reputation

  1. I thought the original contact was stating about "tailoring"an account that suits the trader .Not about closure?
  2. I know ,all we really want is some transparency. whether these so called random checks, is to combat problem gambler's, or maybe criminality ie luandering ect .I can't really think of many other reasons if a client is funding their accounts .for long periods of time
  3. As traders we like to think we are perceptive,but maybe the."client lifecycle analyst" is right here .All very bizarre still no real explanation after several phone conversations
  4. Ok good look ,they did not say that all them years then
  5. This is ridiculous they obviously don't want to use their service anymore for some reason ,they not mentioned if it's to do with issues around money laundering or a stipulation from FCA
  6. Yes me too I'm perplexed after 4 years I feel aggrieved as I don't want disclose saving ect
  7. Sorry Ignore above was nt meant to post it again . Yes regarding day trading or traders who rarely hold trades overnight, though surely significant levels of support/ resistance still apply on the spot chart regardless of an adjustment.
  8. Your just saying exactly what the girl says in the video.Its make spread betting look all so unethical. Why don't you be more transparent.
  9. Yes this seems a contrived reply as usual,why if it's an adjustment it's settled days earlier regardless of future chart movements.The adjustment fees are high when the instrument is at high resistance or support levels basically the FSTE "plugged" at the moment .Can't you say something abit more creative or more transparent
  10. Hello is everyone asleep on here including the ig employees
×
×
  • Create New...
us