Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

What is the downside when buying an option?

Recommended Posts

Hi, If I buy an option on the IG platform, is the downside just limited to the fixed premium paid for the option in some way like a real world option or does the buy just track the price of the underlying option price and therefore the the PnL will move like any other spreadbetting instrument?

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

The "fixed premium" paid and "tracking the price of the option" are effectively one and the same thing. 

For example, take the example of paying £5 to buy a call option on Instrument X:

If you trade on the the actual option market, you pay £5 to buy the call. If at expiry the option finishes out of the money you lose £5.  If the option expires in the money, you take delivery of Instrument X which typically will have a value very close to the value of the option at the moment of expiry.

If you trade a spreadbet on an option on IG, you still pay £5 to establish the position (technically you pay a bit more because IG add their margin to the price of the option). If at expiry the option finishes out of the money, you lose that £5. If the option expires in the money you are paid the value of the option at expiry but do not take delivery of Instrument X. Again the value of the option at expiry will usually be very close to the value of the delivery of Instrument X. 

Both on the actual market and the spreadbet market, the value of the option (and in effect your MTM PnL) will fluctuate based on movements in the price of Instrument X, volatility, theta, etc.

Ian

 

 

 

Edited by Ian_944

Share this post


Link to post

downside limited to:

premium paid
counterparty risk - hopefully a long shot.
funding charges - hopefully a longer shot / lets not encourage the pass through of funding cost of house delta hedges to us.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,162
    • Total Posts
      66,788
    • Total Members
      89,603
    Newest Member
    Joey23
    Joined 01/12/20 15:42
  • Posts

    • Thanks for clarifying. The support person clearly did not understand this at all, and the website is very vague! The 0.5% is something I'm used to from other platforms, and much easier to absorb as a cost on small positions when making a good entry
    • There was another fork the other day - Bitcoin Latinum - the world's largest "insured" digital asset. One wonders if every time another variant is created it simply draws away potential investors from the original version. I bet committed Bitcoiners wish these variants would all just fork off 😉 I saw something the other day that happened to mention that a Bitcoin was worth about 10 ounces of Gold.......then it hit me - would I prefer to be offered one Bitcoin out there in the ether or ten ounces of physical Gold in my actual possession? 10 Bitcoin to buy a single ounce of Gold intuitively feels like the more sensible way around as I'm certain that Gold is safe but several times less certain that Bitcoin is - so we could be out by a factor of 100! But whilst fund managers all start allocating the odd fractional percent to get exposure to Alpha for minimal portfolio downside the price will probably hold or bubble up even more. It will be interesting though  if national regulators later turn round and ban funds from holding cryptos - then they will all have to rush for the exit at the same time. Maybe that's the ultimate expected outcome.  According to Wikipedia in March 2018 0.5% of bitcoin wallets owned 87% of all bitcoins ever mined. Imagine if  transferring that 87% to fund managers at peak prices is the intended end-game before it all collapses? It would make Bernie Madoff look like a mere pick-pocket.  
×
×