Jump to content
  • 0

Trade execution order


tpunt94

Question

Today, I had the unfortunate experience of finding out that trades closer to price are not necessarily executed before trades that are further away from price.

The scenario was that I had entered a long position, set up a limit profit target, and then set up smaller short positions between my long entry and my limit profit target. This was done to allow me to take partial profits on my trade (via net off positions), and then eventually exit the position with my final limit order. Price, however, moved violently through both of my smaller profit targets and through my final limit order within a matter of seconds. But to my surprise, my limit order executed first (despite it being much further away from the previous price than my two lower shorts). I then had two new short positions opened at the levels I had set, which of course placed me into not just one, but two heavy loss positions.

Is this a bug? Is this behaviour documented anywhere? These are some very unexpected execution orderings by this broker, and I'm quite unhappy about it.

Link to comment

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The limit order on a trade simply closes the whole trade - there seems to be no way to adjust its size, so I'm not quite sure how that's a failing on my behalf? And yes, net off was definitely turned on (its the default that I never really change). I don't understand how slippage could be a factor here? You get slippage on stop losses and limit profit targets, where stop losses execute at a worst price and limit profit targets execute at a better price. In this case, my limit profit target did execute at a better price, but opening two short positions much lower down afterwards is completely non-sensical behaviour.

Link to comment
  • 0

Yes apologies, an attached limit order should close the position fully taking into account any other trades which have gone through already on the same instrument.  So really not sure what's happened. Your only option is client help - but it might take a while to get through at the moment, as I'm sure you will be aware 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Despite the complaint on Catizen, I recently saw a tweet where one KOL showed his excitement for the project. He claimed to staked $cati on Bitget Poolx and earn good apr and further encouraged his followers to participate in other campaigns on the exchange for Catizen players. Even when I feel he was just trying to make his followers to be optimistic and stop wasting time complaining. I still feel citizen team were not transparent to their community. While many continue to call the project scam, I choose to defer because the project has a well-defined roadmap and use case for the token. These I feel might have huge impact in the project development and sustainability in this volatile space. We learn daily so this airdrop hunters should take this as a learning stage and further focus on other opportunities abundant in this industry. Many people only farm for airdrop and don’t care to understand the space and see where they can contribute. Web3 is a revolution and is better to join early and create a niche for yourself that just passing through.
    • There was another 30k CATS for the first 200k users that deposit on Bitget. 
    • MemeFi sounds like a fun mix of gaming and DeFi, plus the chance to trade MEMEFI early on Bitget a good opportunity
×
×
  • Create New...
us