Jump to content
  • 0

IG platform error


LC4550

Question

I need your urgent help with the following issue. I had a BTCUSD position with a Limit set at 24029.97.
 
At 1:05.41am today the price reached and went slightly above that Limit. 
 
At 1:05:45am the price again reached and went above that Limit.  
 
Between 1:05:45am and 1:05:50am the price was well above the Limit.  
 
At 1:05:53am the price went again above the Limit.  
 
Despite all these instances of the price going above the Limit, the platform didn't close my position.  
 
As a result i lost £1,086.98.
 
Also, the position is currently in further loss. 

Screenshot_20201223-050700_IG Trading.jpg

Link to comment

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • I first stumbled upon Magnet when @RookieXBT tweeted about it, talking about how magnets have this invisible power that represents hope and faith. Pretty deep for a meme coin, right? 😄 Then @MustStopMurad retweeted it, and boom! The hype train left the station. BingX is adding the MAGNET/USDT pair, which is huge for liquidity. Mark your calendars, folks - deposits open on October 12th at 04:00 UTC, and withdrawals kick off on October 13th at 09:00 UTC.  For you number crunchers out there, Magnet has a total supply of 999,999,996 tokens. Not sure about the tokenomics yet, but I'm definitely going to do some digging before the listing goes live. What's got me intrigued is the community behind this project. The English-speaking crowd is super active, and even the Chinese community is starting to take notice. I've been lurking in their Telegram (t.me/magnet_community0) and Twitter community, and the energy is off the charts!
    • Staking is the cornerstone for Network security in proof of stake (pos) and 32 ETH requirement for becoming a validator remain a stumbling block to many potential participants in Eth transition to pos. This was why one analyst recently praised Puffer Finance and claim it could increase participation since users can participate in Ethereum staking with as little as 1 or 2 ETH, especially with the anti-Slashing Technology. I didn’t pay much attention to his analysis since I didn’t have 1 eth to stake during the testnet stage but will this have any impact on eth staking participation?  
    • What caught my eye is their focus on empowering creators in the crypto world. As someone who's always been interested in the creator economy, I'm really curious to see how their MUA7648 protocol works. Apparently, it helps with the "modularization of AI agent assets" and supports unlimited issuance. Not entirely sure what that means in practice, but it sounds promising! Oh, and get this - they're running a trading event with a 500,000 MUA prize pool! 🎁 If you're interested, you need to register first. Trading starts on October 10th at 07:00 UTC. I've been reading up on their ecosystem, and it's pretty comprehensive. They've got MUA Academy for learning, MUA Cantina as a marketplace, MUA Labs for innovation, and something called MUAverse. With over 5,000 certified creators already on board, it seems like they're building a solid community.
×
×
  • Create New...
us